• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估女性对乳腺癌筛查的表述偏好:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Assessing women's stated preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Health Economics, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1501. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11847-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11847-7
PMID:39609836
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11606195/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common diagnosed disease, and the second leading cause of death among women. Thus, due to its importance, the current research is aimed at identifying the preferences of individuals for improving breast cancer screening programs and the related policies.

METHOD

A systematic search was applied on databases including - PubMed, Scopus, the Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, SID- up to October 2022. The including articles were original or review papers that assessed individuals' willingness to pay. Also, articles including the effective variables or attributes for breast cancer screening program were included. Meta-analysis was applied to calculate Willingness to Pay (WTP) as a mean for breast cancer screening followed by vote-counting for identifying the variables and attributes correlated with screening.

RESULTS

A total of 721 articles were identified during the first phase. After the screening process, thirteen papers were chosen, out of which, nine assessed mammography as a breast cancer screening program. The results of random effect meta-analysis on the including studies indicated that the rate of willingness to pay for screening was 0.28% of GDP per capita (95%CI: 0.14-0.43), which was found to be statistically significant. The result of stratified meta- analysis indicated that the rate of willingness to pay for screening was 0.22% of GDP per capita (95%CI: 0.07-0.37), which was found to be statistically significant. Generally, income was the basic factor for receiving screening services, and cost was an effective attribute for participating in screening programs.

CONCLUSIONS

To increase women's participation in breast cancer screening programs; it is essential to provide legitimate information and eliminate the barriers to women's non-participation. Offering rapid tests at low costs in healthcare centers (both in terms of travel and screening time) delivered by female staff can lead to an increase in women's willingness to participate in breast cancer screening programs.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌是最常见的诊断疾病,也是女性死亡的第二大主要原因。因此,由于其重要性,目前的研究旨在确定个人对改善乳腺癌筛查计划和相关政策的偏好。

方法

对包括 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane、SID 在内的数据库进行了系统搜索,截至 2022 年 10 月。纳入的文章为评估个人支付意愿的原始或综述论文。此外,还纳入了乳腺癌筛查计划的有效变量或属性的文章。应用荟萃分析计算乳腺癌筛查的支付意愿(WTP)作为均值,然后进行票数计数以确定与筛查相关的变量和属性。

结果

在第一阶段共确定了 721 篇文章。经过筛选过程,选择了 13 篇论文,其中 9 篇评估了 mammography 作为乳腺癌筛查计划。对纳入研究的随机效应荟萃分析结果表明,筛查的支付意愿率为人均 GDP 的 0.28%(95%CI:0.14-0.43),具有统计学意义。分层荟萃分析的结果表明,筛查的支付意愿率为人均 GDP 的 0.22%(95%CI:0.07-0.37),具有统计学意义。一般来说,收入是获得筛查服务的基本因素,而成本是参与筛查计划的有效属性。

结论

为了提高妇女参与乳腺癌筛查计划的意愿;必须提供合法的信息并消除妇女不参与的障碍。在医疗保健中心(无论是旅行还是筛查时间)以低成本提供快速测试,并由女性工作人员进行,可以提高妇女参与乳腺癌筛查计划的意愿。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1bd/11606195/0a38a4efb31d/12913_2024_11847_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1bd/11606195/f3a499b1a58f/12913_2024_11847_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1bd/11606195/134df827b313/12913_2024_11847_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1bd/11606195/0a38a4efb31d/12913_2024_11847_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1bd/11606195/f3a499b1a58f/12913_2024_11847_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1bd/11606195/134df827b313/12913_2024_11847_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1bd/11606195/0a38a4efb31d/12913_2024_11847_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing women's stated preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.评估女性对乳腺癌筛查的表述偏好:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1501. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11847-7.
2
Women's preference to apply shared decision-making in breast cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment.女性在乳腺癌筛查中倾向于采用共同决策:一项离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 8;12(11):e064488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064488.
3
Impact of Online Interactive Decision Tools on Women's Decision-Making Regarding Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在线交互式决策工具对女性乳腺癌筛查决策的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 29;27:e65974. doi: 10.2196/65974.
4
Shared decision-making for supporting women's decisions about breast cancer screening.支持女性进行乳腺癌筛查决策的共享决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 10;5(5):CD013822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013822.pub2.
5
What Breast Cancer Screening Program do Rural Women Prefer? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Jiangsu, China.农村妇女更喜欢哪种乳腺癌筛查项目?来自中国江苏的离散选择实验。
Patient. 2024 Jul;17(4):363-378. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00684-9. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Knowledge, Practice, Preferences and Willingness-to-Pay for Mammographic Screening Tests among Iranian Women: A Contingent Valuation Method.伊朗女性对乳房 X 光筛查测试的知识、实践、偏好和支付意愿:一种条件价值评估方法。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Apr 1;23(4):1207-1213. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.4.1207.
8
Assessing Women's Preference and Willingness to Pay for Breast Cancer Screening: A Discrete Choice Experiment Approach.评估女性对乳腺癌筛查的偏好及支付意愿:一种离散选择实验方法。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2025 Jul;48:101110. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101110. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
9
Hospitalized women's willingness to pay for an inpatient screening mammogram.住院女性为住院期间乳腺钼靶筛查付费的意愿。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):556-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1694.
10
Risk-Adapted Breast Screening for Women at Low Predicted Risk of Breast Cancer: An Online Discrete Choice Experiment.基于风险的乳腺癌低预测风险女性乳房筛查:一项在线离散选择实验。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):586-600. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241254828. Epub 2024 Jun 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge, Practice, Preferences and Willingness-to-Pay for Mammographic Screening Tests among Iranian Women: A Contingent Valuation Method.伊朗女性对乳房 X 光筛查测试的知识、实践、偏好和支付意愿:一种条件价值评估方法。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Apr 1;23(4):1207-1213. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.4.1207.
2
Population preferences for breast cancer screening policies: Discrete choice experiment in Belarus.人群对乳腺癌筛查政策的偏好:白俄罗斯的离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 1;14(11):e0224667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224667. eCollection 2019.
3
Investigating the Heterogeneity in Women's Preferences for Breast Screening: Does the Communication of Risk Matter?
探究女性对乳腺癌筛查偏好的异质性:风险沟通是否重要?
Value Health. 2018 Feb;21(2):219-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
4
Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990-2013.癌症筛查的陈述性偏好:1990 - 2013年文献的系统综述
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Feb 25;13:E27. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150433.
5
Developing a discrete choice experiment in Malawi: eliciting preferences for breast cancer early detection services.在马拉维开展离散选择实验:获取对乳腺癌早期检测服务的偏好
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Oct 14;9:1459-72. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S87341. eCollection 2015.
6
Optical imaging for breast cancer prescreening.乳腺癌筛查前的光学成像。
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2015 Jul 20;7:193-209. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S51702. eCollection 2015.
7
Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality in the UK Age trial at 17 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial.17 年随访的英国年龄试验中 40 岁开始的乳腺 X 线筛查对乳腺癌死亡率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1123-1132. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00128-X. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
9
Hospitalized women's willingness to pay for an inpatient screening mammogram.住院女性为住院期间乳腺钼靶筛查付费的意愿。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):556-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1694.
10
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.全球癌症发病与死亡:GLOBOCAN 2012 数据源、方法与主要模式。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.