Roger Claire, Louart Benjamin, Elotmani Loubna, Barton Greg, Escobar Leslie, Koulenti Despoina, Lipman Jeffrey, Leone Marc, Muller Laurent, Boutin Caroline, Amour Julien, Banakh Iouri, Cousson Joel, Bourenne Jeremy, Constantin Jean-Michel, Albanese Jacques, Roberts Jason A, Lefrant Jean-Yves
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, Place du Professeur Robert Debré, 30 029, Nîmes cedex 9, France.
Equipe D, Caractéristiques Féminines Des Interfaces Vasculaires (IMAGINE), Faculté de Médecine, Univ Montpellier, 2992, Montpellier, France.
Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Mar 19;11(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00834-4.
While aminoglycosides (AG) have been used for decades, debate remains on their optimal dosing strategy. We investigated the international practices of AG usage specifically regarding dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in critically ill patients. We conducted a prospective, multicentre, observational, cohort study in 59 intensive-care units (ICUs) in 5 countries enrolling all ICU patients receiving AG therapy for septic shock.
We enrolled 931 septic ICU patients [mean ± standard deviation, age 63 ± 15 years, female 364 (39%), median (IQR) SAPS II 51 (38-65)] receiving AG as part of empirical (761, 84%) or directed (147, 16%) therapy. The AG used was amikacin in 614 (66%), gentamicin in 303 (33%), and tobramycin in 14 (1%) patients. The median (IQR) duration of therapy was 2 (1-3) days, the number of doses was 2 (1-2), the median dose was 25 ± 6, 6 ± 2, and 6 ± 2 mg/kg for amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin respectively, and the median dosing interval was 26 (23.5-43.5) h. TDM of C and C was performed in 437 (47%) and 501 (57%) patients, respectively, after the first dose with 295 (68%) patients achieving a C/MIC > 8 and 353 (71%) having concentrations above C recommended thresholds. The ICU mortality rate was 27% with multivariable analysis showing no correlation between AG dosing or pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment and clinical outcomes.
Short courses of high AG doses are mainly used in ICU patients with septic shock, although wide variability in AG usage is reported. We could show no correlation between PK/PD target attainment and clinical outcome. Efforts to optimize the first AG dose remain necessary. Trial registration Clinical Trials, NCT02850029, registered on 29th July 2016, retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.
虽然氨基糖苷类药物(AG)已使用数十年,但关于其最佳给药策略的争论仍在继续。我们调查了AG在危重症患者中的国际使用情况,特别是关于给药和治疗药物监测(TDM)方面。我们在5个国家的59个重症监护病房(ICU)进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性队列研究,纳入所有因感染性休克接受AG治疗的ICU患者。
我们纳入了931例感染性休克的ICU患者[平均±标准差,年龄63±15岁,女性364例(39%),中位数(四分位间距)急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(SAPS II)为51(38 - 65)],接受AG作为经验性(761例,84%)或针对性(147例,16%)治疗的一部分。使用的AG中,阿米卡星614例(66%),庆大霉素303例(33%),妥布霉素14例(1%)。治疗的中位数(四分位间距)持续时间为2(1 - 3)天,给药次数为2(1 - 2)次,阿米卡星、庆大霉素和妥布霉素的中位数剂量分别为25±6、6±2和6±2mg/kg,给药间隔中位数为26(23.5 - 43.5)小时。首次给药后,分别对437例(47%)和501例(57%)患者进行了C和C的TDM,295例(68%)患者的C/MIC>8,353例(71%)患者的血药浓度高于推荐阈值。ICU死亡率为27%,多变量分析显示AG给药或药代动力学/药效学目标达成与临床结果之间无相关性。
虽然AG使用情况存在很大差异,但感染性休克的ICU患者主要使用短疗程高剂量AG。我们发现药代动力学/药效学目标达成与临床结果之间无相关性。优化首次AG剂量的努力仍然必要。试验注册 临床试验,NCT02850029,于2016年7月29日注册,回顾性注册,https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。