Akar Kadir, Yücetepe Ayfer Güllü, Ekin İsmail Hakkı, Dadar Maryam, Erdenliğ Gürbilek Sevil
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Van Yuzuncu Yıl University, Van, Turkey.
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Turkey.
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Jan;116:102277. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2024.102277. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
Brucella canis and smooth Brucella species infections have been reported in dogs globally. In endemic countries such as Türkiye, dogs can be infected with both species. The exact incidence of canine brucellosis in Türkiye is unknown. This study aims to investigate the seroprevalence of brucellosis in stray dogs undergoing sterilization in Van province, eastern Türkiye. In this study, a comprehensive approach was used to ensure reliable incidence of Brucella spp in the dogs. We used the Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) with both antigens from smooth Brucella abortus S99 (RBPT-S) and rough B. canis (RBPT-R) Brucella species to analyze 150 dog blood serum samples. For the in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (i-ELISA), we used a rough Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antigen from the rough strain (i-ELISA-R) and an O-polysaccharide (O-PS) antigen (i-ELISA-S) from the smooth strain obtained from the OIE Reference Laboratory in Weybridge, UK. Each serum sample underwent analysis using a total of four serological tests, ensuring a thorough and reliable evaluation. Out of 150 serum samples analyzed, 32 (21.3 %) tested positive using the RBPT-S test and 12 (6.6 %) with the RBPT-R test. The i-ELISA-R identified 8 (5.3 %) positive samples, while the i-ELISA-S detected 27 (18 %) positive samples. The presence of B. canis and other Brucella spp. infections was detected in the dog in this region, revealing that canine brucellosis was primarily caused by smooth Brucella species. The test beased -smooth antigens identified a significantly higher number of positive samples compared to the test beased -rough antigens test, suggesting a potential difference in sensitivity or specificity between the two methods. This situation was considered an important risk for both dogs and humans, underscoring the urgent need for further research and the immediate implementation of public health measures to address this issue.
全球范围内均有犬感染犬布鲁氏菌和光滑型布鲁氏菌的报道。在土耳其等流行国家,犬可感染这两种菌。土耳其犬布鲁氏菌病的确切发病率尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查土耳其东部凡省接受绝育的流浪犬布鲁氏菌病的血清阳性率。在本研究中,采用了综合方法以确保犬中布鲁氏菌属的可靠发病率。我们使用了来自光滑型流产布鲁氏菌S99(RBPT-S)和粗糙型犬布鲁氏菌(RBPT-R)两种抗原的虎红平板凝集试验(RBPT)来分析150份犬血清样本。对于内部酶联免疫吸附试验(i-ELISA),我们使用了来自粗糙菌株的粗糙脂多糖(LPS)抗原(i-ELISA-R)和来自英国韦布里奇世界动物卫生组织参考实验室的光滑菌株的O-多糖(O-PS)抗原(i-ELISA-S)。每个血清样本总共进行了四项血清学检测分析,以确保进行全面且可靠的评估。在分析的150份血清样本中,32份(21.3%)使用RBPT-S检测呈阳性,12份(6.6%)使用RBPT-R检测呈阳性。i-ELISA-R鉴定出8份(5.3%)阳性样本,而i-ELISA-S检测到27份(18%)阳性样本。该地区的犬中检测到犬布鲁氏菌和其他布鲁氏菌属感染,表明犬布鲁氏菌病主要由光滑型布鲁氏菌引起。与基于粗糙抗原的检测相比,基于光滑抗原的检测鉴定出的阳性样本数量显著更多,这表明两种方法在敏感性或特异性上可能存在差异。这种情况被认为对犬和人类都是一个重要风险,强调迫切需要进一步研究并立即实施公共卫生措施来解决这一问题。