Department of Surgery, Trauma Research Unit, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Netherlands Ministry of Defence, Defence Healthcare Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 28;14(11):e085880. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085880.
The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of value-based healthcare (VBHC) strategies and/or components within military medicine. For this purpose, the extent to which VBHC has been applied within a military health system (MHS), with emphasis on military trauma care was assessed.
This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
Medline, Embase, Web of Science CC and the Cochrane CRCT databases were searched from 1946 to present for VBHC strategies and/or components and military settings, including associated keywords.
We included observational and trial studies focused on the presence of VBHC components and/or system, and the presence of acute/trauma operational care or definitive postoperational care regarding combat injured service members. The included articles were classified into injury-related and system-level studies.
Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included studies. For quality assessment, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version 2018 was used.
A total of 3241 publications were screened, and 18 were included for data extraction. 15 studies focused on (military) medical trauma-related conditions (injury groups), and 3 studies focused on an MHS approach. Four articles contained the two VBHC components ('creating an integrated practice unit' and 'measuring outcomes and costs for every patient') considered the basis for successful implementation. The 'outcomes and costs' and 'patient-centred care' components were most prevalent as respectively mentioned in 17 and 8 included studies.
The systematic review showed the application of VBHC components in military medicine, although use of standard VBHC terminology is not consistently applied. This study suggests that implementing VBHC as a concept in military healthcare, could enhance benchmarking to provide insight in health outcomes (both clinically and patient-reported), and overall quality of care.
本系统评价的目的是概述军事医学中的基于价值的医疗保健(VBHC)策略和/或组成部分。为此,评估 VBHC 在军事卫生系统(MHS)中的应用程度,重点是军事创伤护理。
本系统评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选项目指南。
从 1946 年至今,在 Medline、Embase、Web of Science CC 和 Cochrane CRCT 数据库中搜索 VBHC 策略和/或组成部分和军事环境的研究,包括相关关键字。
我们纳入了关注 VBHC 组成部分和/或系统存在以及关于作战受伤军人的急性/创伤操作性护理或确定性术后护理的存在的观察性和试验研究。纳入的文章分为与损伤相关的研究和系统水平的研究。
两名独立评审员使用标准化方法搜索、筛选和编码纳入的研究。为了进行质量评估,使用了混合方法评估工具 2018 版本。
共筛选出 3241 篇出版物,有 18 篇被纳入数据提取。15 项研究侧重于(军事)医疗创伤相关条件(损伤组),3 项研究侧重于 MHS 方法。有 4 篇文章包含了被认为是成功实施的基础的两个 VBHC 组成部分(“创建一个综合实践单位”和“为每个患者测量结果和成本”)。“结果和成本”和“以患者为中心的护理”这两个组成部分分别在 17 项和 8 项纳入的研究中被提及。
系统评价显示 VBHC 组件在军事医学中的应用,尽管不始终如一地使用标准 VBHC 术语。本研究表明,将 VBHC 作为军事医疗保健中的一个概念实施,可以增强基准测试,提供对健康结果(临床和患者报告)和整体护理质量的洞察。