• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Measuring quality in the care of metastatic colorectal cancer utilising available registry data: A modified Delphi study.

作者信息

Dunn Catherine, Shapiro Jeremy, Lee Margaret, Wong Rachel, Lee Belinda, Wong Hui-Li, Loft Matthew, Jalali Azim, Gibbs Peter

机构信息

Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2025 Jan;214:115142. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115142. Epub 2024 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115142
PMID:39615331
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The current lack of quality indicators for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer compromises our ability to examine the quality of care delivered, and to ensure optimal patient outcomes. We sought to define a novel set of quality indicators that could be assessed using available data from a prospective comprehensive clinical colorectal cancer registry, ultimately enabling us to explore local practice and benchmark performance between institutions.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature to review existing quality indicators for metastatic colorectal cancer. We engaged an expert panel of medical oncologists in a two-step modified Delphi analysis, using online questionnaires to rate and refine our initial list of candidate indicators, and to generate potential new ones.

RESULTS

Thirty-five unique quality indicators for metastatic colorectal cancer were identified from the literature. Nine of these 35 were able to be captured in TRACC, and an additional 3 novel indicators, also captured in TRACC, were added to the list to reflect current practice. After 2 online surveys of eight medical oncologists, a final list of 14 quality indicators were recommended for inclusion.

CONCLUSION

A modified Delphi method was used to propose a set of 14 novel quality indicators to be extracted from an existing comprehensive metastatic colorectal cancer clinical registry. The quality indicators intentionally encompassed critical components of modern, multi-disciplinary care, spanning the treatment continuum across diagnosis to end of life. These will be used in work underway utilising TRACC data to identify potential gaps in care and avenues for quality improvement.

摘要

相似文献

1
Measuring quality in the care of metastatic colorectal cancer utilising available registry data: A modified Delphi study.
Eur J Cancer. 2025 Jan;214:115142. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115142. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
2
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
8
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
9
The value of FDG positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (PET/CT) in pre-operative staging of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(FDG-PET/CT)在结直肠癌术前分期中的价值:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Sep;15(35):1-192, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15350.
10
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.