• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯巴占作为中国难治性癫痫辅助治疗的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness of clobazam as an adjunctive treatment for refractory epilepsy in China.

作者信息

Chen Shunan, Mao Fengqian, Hu Yani, Wang Suhong, Chen Jie, Zhang Jiali, Yu Lingyan, Dai Haibin

机构信息

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Apr;47(2):373-381. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01838-3. Epub 2024 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-024-01838-3
PMID:39616291
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clobazam (CLB) is an effective, safe and well-tolerated adjunctive treatment for refractory epilepsy. However, the cost-effectiveness of CLB in China remains unclear.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CLB as an adjunctive therapy for patients with refractory epilepsy in China.

METHOD

A Markov model was established to simulate the lifetime epilepsy process in patients. The epilepsy remission rate, health state utility and mortality data were derived from clinical trials and the literature. The costs were collected from the health care system in the hospital. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which was calculated by comparing CLB as an add-on therapy with conventional therapy and was assessed in the context of the Chinese health system. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate parameter uncertainty, and several scenario analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

Compared with maintaining conventional therapy, adding CLB as an adjuvant therapy increased the cost of Chinese Yuan (CNY) 1770.17 over a lifetime, with an incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) value of 1.02, resulting in an ICER of CNY 1737.10 per QALY gained. The daily dose of CLB had the strongest effect on the ICER. The probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that the probability of CLB being cost-effective was 77.35% at a willingness to pay (WTP) of CNY 85698/QALY.

CONCLUSION

CLB is a cost-effective add-on therapy for refractory epilepsy in the Chinese population.

摘要

背景

氯巴占(CLB)是难治性癫痫一种有效、安全且耐受性良好的辅助治疗药物。然而,氯巴占在中国的成本效益仍不明确。

目的

本研究旨在评估氯巴占作为中国难治性癫痫患者辅助治疗的成本效益。

方法

建立马尔可夫模型以模拟患者的终生癫痫病程。癫痫缓解率、健康状态效用值和死亡率数据来源于临床试验及文献。成本从医院医疗保健系统收集。主要结局指标为增量成本效益比(ICER),通过将氯巴占作为附加治疗与传统治疗进行比较计算得出,并在中国卫生系统背景下进行评估。进行单向和概率敏感性分析以评估参数不确定性,还进行了几种情景分析。

结果

与维持传统治疗相比,添加氯巴占作为辅助治疗在终生期间增加成本1770.17元,增量质量调整生命年(QALY)值为1.02,导致每获得一个QALY的ICER为1737.10元。氯巴占的日剂量对ICER影响最大。概率敏感性分析显示,在支付意愿(WTP)为85698元/QALY时,氯巴占具有成本效益的概率为77.35%。

结论

氯巴占是中国人群难治性癫痫一种具有成本效益的附加治疗药物。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of clobazam as an adjunctive treatment for refractory epilepsy in China.氯巴占作为中国难治性癫痫辅助治疗的成本效益分析
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Apr;47(2):373-381. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01838-3. Epub 2024 Dec 1.
2
Economic Evaluation of Stiripentol for Dravet Syndrome: A Cost-Utility Analysis.Stiripentol 治疗 Dravet 综合征的经济性评价:成本-效用分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Oct;36(10):1253-1261. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0669-7.
3
Influenza vaccination for heart failure patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system.心力衰竭患者的流感疫苗接种:中国医疗体系视角下的成本效益分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 9;12:1348207. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348207. eCollection 2024.
4
Efficacy of cannabidiol in subjects with refractory epilepsy relative to concomitant use of clobazam.评估使用氯巴占的情况下,大麻二酚对难治性癫痫患者的疗效。
Epilepsy Res. 2020 Feb;160:106263. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106263. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
5
CLB add-on treatment in patients with epileptic encephalopathy: a single center experience with long-term follow-up.氯巴占附加治疗癫痫性脑病患者:一项单中心长期随访经验
Acta Neurol Belg. 2022 Feb;122(1):51-57. doi: 10.1007/s13760-021-01606-4. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
6
Cost-effectiveness of epileptic surgery compared with medical treatment in children with drug-resistant epilepsy.抗癫痫药物治疗无效的儿童癫痫手术与药物治疗的成本效益比较。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Aug;97:253-259. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
7
Is first-line treatment with polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (pola-R-CHP) for previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cost-effective in China? A cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model.对于先前未经治疗的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤,使用泊洛妥珠单抗维达替尼-利妥昔单抗-环磷酰胺、多柔比星和泼尼松(pola-R-CHP)进行一线治疗在中国是否具有成本效益?一项使用马尔可夫模型的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e086251. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086251.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.心脏再同步治疗(双心室起搏)用于心力衰竭的临床疗效及成本效益:系统评价与经济学模型
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. doi: 10.3310/hta11470.
9
Cost-effectiveness of perampanel as an adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled focal seizures in pediatric patients: a Chinese perspective.作为儿科患者局灶性癫痫发作控制不佳的辅助治疗,吡仑帕奈的成本效益:中国视角
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Mar;10(6):364. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-994.
10
The economic impact associated with stent retriever selection for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis of MASTRO I data from a Chinese healthcare system perspective.支架取栓术选择治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的经济影响:基于中国医疗体系视角下 MASTRO I 数据的成本效果分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Nov;13(11):e240160. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0160. Epub 2024 Nov 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of cenobamate for focal seizures in people with drug-resistant epilepsy.司替戊醇治疗耐药性癫痫患者局灶性癫痫发作的成本效益
Epilepsia. 2023 Apr;64(4):843-856. doi: 10.1111/epi.17506. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
Mapping analysis to predict SF-6D utilities from health outcomes in people with focal epilepsy.对有局灶性癫痫的人群的健康结局进行映射分析,以预测 SF-6D 效用值。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Sep;24(7):1061-1072. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01519-w. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
3
Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobazam in Adults With Drug-Refractory Epilepsy.
氯巴占在药物难治性癫痫成年患者中的疗效和耐受性
Neurol Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;11(5):e669-e676. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000992.
4
Treatment-Related Costs of Childhood Epilepsy in Mainland China: A Preliminary Study in a Tertiary Pediatric Epilepsy Center.中国大陆儿童癫痫的治疗相关费用:在一家三级儿科癫痫中心的初步研究
J Child Neurol. 2019 Feb;34(2):68-73. doi: 10.1177/0883073818811176. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
5
Economic Evaluation of Stiripentol for Dravet Syndrome: A Cost-Utility Analysis.Stiripentol 治疗 Dravet 综合征的经济性评价:成本-效用分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Oct;36(10):1253-1261. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0669-7.
6
Expert Opinion on the Management of Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: Treatment Algorithms and Practical Considerations.关于伦诺克斯-加斯东综合征管理的专家意见:治疗算法与实际考量
Front Neurol. 2017 Sep 29;8:505. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00505. eCollection 2017.
7
Long-term retention rates for antiepileptic drugs: A review of long-term extension studies and comparison with brivaracetam.抗癫痫药物的长期留存率:长期扩展研究综述及与布瓦西坦的比较
Epilepsy Res. 2017 Dec;138:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
8
Adapting Pharmacoeconomics to Shape Efficient Health Systems en Route to UHC - Lessons from Two Continents.调整药物经济学以塑造通往全民健康覆盖之路的高效卫生系统——来自两大洲的经验教训。
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Oct 10;8:715. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00715. eCollection 2017.
9
The direct cost of epilepsy in the United States: A systematic review of estimates.美国癫痫的直接成本:系统评价估计。
Epilepsia. 2015 Sep;56(9):1376-87. doi: 10.1111/epi.13084. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
10
Cause-specific mortality among patients with epilepsy: results from a 30-year cohort study.癫痫患者的病因特异性死亡率:一项 30 年队列研究的结果。
Epilepsia. 2013 Mar;54(3):495-501. doi: 10.1111/epi.12014. Epub 2012 Nov 21.