He Yanyun, Park Hojin, Cheng Kai-Wen, Yang Qian, Zhang Zezhong, Shang Ce
Center for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, United States.
Center for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, United States.
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Jan;135:104664. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104664. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
Smokeless Tobacco (SLT) use prevalence among youth in the United States (US) is comparable to youth prevalence of cigarette smoking. However, it is in general understudied compared to cigarettes and draws less attention nowadays compared to e-cigarettes (ECs).
We estimate the own- and cross-tax elasticities of SLT use among US youth and explicitly test how SLT use changes in response to taxes on SLT, cigarettes, ECs, and beer.
We standardized SLT taxes for chewing tobacco, moist snuff, dry snuff, and snus, and computed average SLT taxes. We implemented a logit regression model within the state- and year-fixed effects framework.
A 10 % increase in SLT excise taxes reduced youth SLT use by 4 % (p < 0.01). This result is primarily driven by males, Whites, multiple non-Hispanic races, other races, and individuals living in non-Appalachian states. In addition, a 10 % increase in cigarette taxes increases youth SLT use by 8 % (p < 0.05), suggesting substitutional effects. A 10 % increase in EC and beer taxes reduce SLT use by 0.5 % and 2.4 % (p < 0.01), respectively, suggesting complementary effects.
Raising excise taxes on SLT products can effectively curtail their usage among the youth population. Furthermore, increasing EC and beer taxes reduces youth SLT use. However, an increase in cigarette taxes leads to an unintended consequence of promoting SLT use among youth. In addition, increasing SLT taxes does not appear to significantly impact the disparities in youth SLT use by whether living in Appalachian states. Future research is needed to assess whether SLT taxes reduce disparities in use by rural/urban divisions.
在美国,青少年无烟烟草(SLT)的使用率与青少年吸烟率相当。然而,与香烟相比,它总体上研究较少,与电子烟(EC)相比,如今受到的关注也较少。
我们估计美国青少年SLT使用的自身和交叉税收弹性,并明确测试SLT使用如何因对SLT、香烟、电子烟和啤酒征税而变化。
我们对嚼烟、湿鼻烟、干鼻烟和口含烟的SLT税进行了标准化,并计算了平均SLT税。我们在州和年份固定效应框架内实施了logit回归模型。
SLT消费税提高10%,青少年SLT使用率降低4%(p<0.01)。这一结果主要由男性、白人、多个非西班牙裔种族、其他种族以及居住在非阿巴拉契亚州的个人推动。此外,香烟税提高10%,青少年SLT使用率增加8%(p<0.05),表明存在替代效应。电子烟税和啤酒税提高10%,分别使SLT使用率降低0.5%和2.4%(p<0.01),表明存在互补效应。
提高SLT产品的消费税可以有效减少其在青少年中的使用。此外,提高电子烟和啤酒税会降低青少年SLT的使用。然而,香烟税的增加会导致促进青少年使用SLT这一意外后果。此外,提高SLT税似乎不会显著影响居住在阿巴拉契亚州与否的青少年在SLT使用上的差异。未来需要进行研究,以评估SLT税是否能减少农村/城市地区在使用上的差异。