Baeta Renaud, Léauté Justine, Sansault Éric, Pincebourde Sylvain
Association Naturaliste d'Etude et de Protection des Ecosystèmes CAUDALIS, La Riche, France.
Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, UMR 7261, CNRS - Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Ecol Appl. 2025 Jan;35(1):e3057. doi: 10.1002/eap.3057. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
Agricultural areas represent one of the major ecosystems of the world. Intensification of agricultural practices produced openfields characterized by low biological diversity. Nevertheless, the distance up to which intensive agricultural fields alter surrounding natural systems is rarely quantified. We determined the spatial scale at which agricultural landscapes alter the diversity of Odonates, a key taxon in wetland ponds, and we tested to what extent citizen science data can be used reliably for this purpose. We compiled 7731 observations made in a portion of the region Centre-Val-de-Loire (France) over 10 years by naturalists on 729 water bodies to analyze the effect of agricultural landscapes (mainly wheat, rapeseed, sunflower) on the species richness of both damselflies and dragonflies in lentic systems. Sixty species were reported over the 10-year period. For dragonflies, intensive agricultural landscapes best explained their richness at the scales of 800 and 1600 m for overall and autochthonous species, respectively, when using the full dataset. The spatial scale was smaller for damselflies, at 200 m for both overall and autochthonous species. These distances were not severely impacted when constraining the data to consider several biases. Multimodel averaging showed that the proportion of intensive agriculture decreased species richness, despite the potential biases inherent to an imperfect database acquired by citizens. This imperfect citizen dataset allows to infer the lowest effect size of agriculture on species richness. Quantitatively, this effect was more important for autochthonous species. Interestingly, both relatively rare taxa and common or generalist species can be under threat in intensive agricultural landscapes, calling for more ecotoxicological studies. The influence of agricultural practices from a distance implies that conservation and management plans of wetland ponds should consider the landscape ecological characteristics and not only the pond features. Conservation efforts focusing too locally on a site may be undermined because intensive agriculture from a distance limits the potential for the site to recover highly diverse communities. These distant effects should be integrated by policy-makers when deciding which wetland pond should benefit from a conservation plan or which conservation action may be planned, implementing, for instance, buffer zones and/or ecological corridors composed of natural vegetation.
农业区域是世界主要生态系统之一。农业活动集约化产生了生物多样性低的开阔田地。然而,集约化农田对周围自然系统产生影响的距离很少被量化。我们确定了农业景观改变湿地池塘关键分类群蜻蜓目多样性的空间尺度,并测试了公民科学数据在多大程度上可可靠地用于此目的。我们汇总了10年间博物学家在法国中央-卢瓦尔河谷地区一部分区域的729个水体上所做的7731次观测,以分析农业景观(主要是小麦、油菜籽、向日葵)对静水系统中豆娘和蜻蜓物种丰富度的影响。在这10年期间共记录了60个物种。对于蜻蜓,使用完整数据集时,集约化农业景观在800米和1600米尺度上分别能最好地解释其总体物种和本地物种的丰富度。豆娘的空间尺度较小,总体物种和本地物种均为200米。在对数据进行限制以考虑多种偏差时,这些距离并未受到严重影响。多模型平均法表明,尽管公民获取的不完美数据库存在固有偏差,但集约化农业的比例降低了物种丰富度。这个不完美的公民数据集可以推断出农业对物种丰富度的最低效应大小。从数量上看,这种效应对本地物种更为重要。有趣的是,在集约化农业景观中,相对稀有的分类群以及常见或广布物种都可能受到威胁,这就需要更多的生态毒理学研究。远距离农业活动的影响意味着湿地池塘的保护和管理计划应考虑景观生态特征,而不仅仅是池塘特征。过于局部地关注某一地点的保护工作可能会受到破坏,因为远距离的集约化农业限制了该地点恢复高度多样化群落潜力。政策制定者在决定哪些湿地池塘应受益于保护计划或可能规划实施哪些保护行动时,例如设置由自然植被组成的缓冲区和/或生态走廊时,应将这些远距离影响考虑在内。