Jotdar Arijit, Dutta Mainak, Ghosh Bhaskar, Kundu Sohag, Mukhopadhyay Subrata
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh India.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Kalyani, West Bengal India.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Dec;23(6):1634-1645. doi: 10.1007/s12663-024-02296-0. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
Most tertiary-care teaching institutes in low and middle-income nations lack dedicated oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) units in the emergency trauma centers. Consequently, most facial fractures need to be managed in the otolaryngology and head-neck surgery (ORL-HNS) setup.
To present a study on a series of patients with facial fractures attending the emergency and outpatient departments of ORL-HNS in a tertiary-care teaching institute in India that lacked the facility of OMFS in its emergency trauma center.
For the patients included in the study, a general protocol for managing polytrauma was followed. Patients with concomitant intracavitary and long bone injuries were excluded. Those with facial fractures that essentially required OMFS expertise were referred to dedicated maxillofacial centers. The most common presentation was pain/tenderness, followed by peri-orbital ecchymosis and trismus. Orbital symptoms were associated with orbital floor and zygomatico-maxillary complex fractures. Diagnosis and surgical planning were made following high-resolution computed tomography scan. Except for nasal bones, all the fractures were managed by open reduction and fixation.
The mean age of the 26 patients included in the series was 32.88 years (range 7-55 years) with a male preponderance of 2.7:1. The fractures involved orbital floor ( = 3), frontal bone ( = 2), mandible ( = 4), zygomatico-maxillary complex ( = 14), and nasal bone ( = 3). Road traffic accidents were the commonest etiology. Management of the respective facial bone fractures was done following the standard care of surgical practice.
For their expertise in functionally and esthetically appropriate repair, a dedicated OMFS unit is desirable for managing facial fractures. The present series shares the experience of managing such fractures by the ORL-HNS team in the absence of an OMFS facility in the emergency trauma center, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in the care delivery system.
低收入和中等收入国家的大多数三级护理教学机构在急诊创伤中心缺乏专门的口腔颌面外科(OMFS)科室。因此,大多数面部骨折需要在耳鼻喉科和头颈外科(ORL-HNS)进行处理。
在印度一家三级护理教学机构中,该机构的急诊创伤中心缺乏OMFS设施,现呈现一项关于在ORL-HNS急诊和门诊就诊的一系列面部骨折患者的研究。
对于纳入研究的患者,遵循多创伤管理的一般方案。排除伴有腔内和长骨损伤的患者。那些本质上需要OMFS专业知识的面部骨折患者被转诊至专门的颌面中心。最常见的表现是疼痛/压痛,其次是眶周瘀斑和牙关紧闭。眼眶症状与眶底和颧上颌复合体骨折有关。在高分辨率计算机断层扫描后进行诊断和手术规划。除鼻骨骨折外,所有骨折均采用切开复位内固定治疗。
该系列纳入的26例患者的平均年龄为32.88岁(范围7 - 55岁),男性占比为2.7:1。骨折累及眶底(n = 3)、额骨(n = 2)、下颌骨(n = 4)、颧上颌复合体(n = 14)和鼻骨(n = 3)。道路交通事故是最常见的病因。按照外科手术的标准护理对相应的面部骨折进行处理。
鉴于其在功能和美学上进行适当修复的专业知识,处理面部骨折需要一个专门的OMFS科室。本系列分享了在急诊创伤中心缺乏OMFS设施的情况下,ORL-HNS团队处理此类骨折的经验,强调了多学科方法在护理提供系统中的重要性。