• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于改良巴氏指数的自我管理绩效评估工具的可靠性

Reliability of a Self-Administered Performance Evaluation Tool Based on the Modified Barthel Index.

作者信息

Watanabe Hidehiro, Oguri Yuka, Noritake Kento, Suzuki Yohei, Okamura Hidetoshi, Fujii Keisuke

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Tokai Memorial Hospital, Kasugai, JPN.

Faculty of Health Sciences, Nihon Fukushi University, Handa, JPN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Oct 29;16(10):e72665. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72665. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.72665
PMID:39618645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11604350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurately assessing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) is crucial for evaluating patient independence, yet there is a lack of standardized tools suitable for large-scale surveys, particularly those that are self-administered. We aimed to validate the reliability of the self-administered Performance Evaluation Tool based on the modified Barthel Index (PET-MBI).

METHODS

In this study, 53 patients and 18 occupational therapists were included to determine the inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities via questionnaires. The inclusion criteria for patients were being admitted to a convalescent or community care ward and being able to communicate. The inclusion criteria for professionals were being an occupational therapist in charge of the patients and having at least two years of experience.

RESULTS

The inter-rater reliability scores of PET-MBI were 80.4 ± 20.4 and 81.1 ± 19.2 points for patient and therapist ratings, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total score was 0.888. Regarding intra-rater reliability, the patients' scores were 80.4 ± 20.4 and 84.1 ± 19.8 points for the first and second assessments, respectively. The ICC for the total score was 0.927.

CONCLUSION

The self-administered PET-MBI demonstrated reliability in terms of total scores and numerous sub-items, demonstrating potential as a valuable tool for ADL assessment in large-scale surveys.

摘要

背景

准确评估日常生活活动能力(ADL)对于评估患者的独立性至关重要,但缺乏适用于大规模调查的标准化工具,尤其是那些可自行填写的工具。我们旨在验证基于改良巴氏指数(PET-MBI)的自行填写式性能评估工具的可靠性。

方法

在本研究中,纳入了53名患者和18名职业治疗师,通过问卷调查来确定评分者间信度和评分者内信度。患者的纳入标准为入住康复或社区护理病房且能够沟通。专业人员的纳入标准为负责这些患者的职业治疗师且具有至少两年工作经验。

结果

PET-MBI评分者间信度得分,患者评分和治疗师评分分别为80.4±20.4分和81.1±19.2分。总分的组内相关系数(ICC)为0.888。关于评分者内信度,患者第一次和第二次评估的得分分别为80.4±20.4分和84.1±19.8分。总分的ICC为0.927。

结论

自行填写式PET-MBI在总分和众多子项目方面都显示出可靠性,表明其有潜力成为大规模调查中ADL评估的有价值工具。

相似文献

1
Reliability of a Self-Administered Performance Evaluation Tool Based on the Modified Barthel Index.基于改良巴氏指数的自我管理绩效评估工具的可靠性
Cureus. 2024 Oct 29;16(10):e72665. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72665. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Validity and reliability of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index for stroke patients.基于改良巴氏指数的脑卒中患者绩效评估工具的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 25;17(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0409-2.
3
Validity, inter-rater reliability, and feasibility of the Chelsea Physical Assessment Tool for assessing physical function in post-acute COVID-19 patients: A cross-sectional study.《切尔西身体评估工具评估 COVID-19 后康复期患者身体功能的有效性、评分者间信度和可行性:一项横断面研究》。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(3):527-539. doi: 10.3233/BMR-220191.
4
A comparison of test-retest reliability and random measurement error of the Barthel Index and modified Barthel Index in patients with chronic stroke.慢性脑卒中患者Barthel 指数和改良 Barthel 指数重测信度和随机测量误差的比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 May;44(10):2099-2103. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1814429. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
5
Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale: Psychometric properties during medication phases in idiopathic Parkinson disease.巴塞尔指数和改良兰金量表:特发性帕金森病药物治疗阶段的心理测量特性。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Nov;63(6):500-504. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
6
Examination of reliability and validity of the Self-Assessment Burden Scale-Motor for community-dwelling older adults in Japan: a validation study.日本社区居住老年人自我评估负担量表-运动部分的信度和效度检验:一项验证研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Jul 18;12:e17730. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17730. eCollection 2024.
7
[Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].《青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)法语版的翻译与验证》
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):499-505.
8
High inter-rater reliability of Japanese bedriddenness ranks and cognitive function scores: a hospital-based prospective observational study.日本卧床等级和认知功能评分的观察者间可靠性高:一项基于医院的前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 9;21(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02108-x.
9
User testing of the psychometric properties of pictorial-based disability assessment Longshi Scale by healthcare professionals and non-professionals: a Chinese study in Shenzhen.医护人员和非专业人员对基于图像的残疾评估 Longshi 量表的心理测量特性进行用户测试:深圳的一项中文研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Sep;33(9):1479-1491. doi: 10.1177/0269215519846543. Epub 2019 May 13.
10
Evaluating inter- and intra-rater reliability in assessing upper limb compensatory movements post-stroke: creating a ground truth through video analysis?评估中风后上肢代偿运动评估中评分者间和评分者内的可靠性:通过视频分析创建一个金标准?
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Dec 20;21(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01506-7.

引用本文的文献

1
[Effect of the Otago Exercise Program on Activities of Daily Living in Older Adults With Sarcopenia].[奥塔哥运动计划对患有肌少症的老年人日常生活活动能力的影响]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Mar 20;56(2):543-548. doi: 10.12182/20250360608.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality-Related Risk Factors in Geriatric Patients with Hip Fracture.老年髋部骨折患者的死亡相关危险因素
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2023 Jun;27(2):126-133. doi: 10.4235/agmr.23.0010. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
2
Assessment tools to evaluate Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) in older adults: A systematic review.评估老年人日常生活活动(ADL)和工具性日常生活活动(IADL)的评估工具:一项系统综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Apr 13;34:33. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.33. eCollection 2020.
3
Interview Functional Independence Measure score: self-reporting as a simpler alternative to multidisciplinary functional assessment.访谈功能性独立性测量评分:自我报告作为一种比多学科功能评估更简单的替代方法。
Singapore Med J. 2019 Apr;60(4):199-201. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2018048. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
4
Associations of ADL and IADL disability with physical and mental dimensions of quality of life in people aged 75 years and older.75岁及以上老年人日常生活活动能力和工具性日常生活活动能力残疾与生活质量的身体和心理维度的关联。
PeerJ. 2018 Aug 9;6:e5425. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5425. eCollection 2018.
5
Validity and reliability of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index for stroke patients.基于改良巴氏指数的脑卒中患者绩效评估工具的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 25;17(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0409-2.
6
Assessment of the validity and internal consistency of a performance evaluation tool based on the Japanese version of the modified barthel index for elderly people living at home.基于日本版改良巴氏指数对居家老年人进行的绩效评估工具的效度和内部一致性评估。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Dec;26(12):1971-4. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1971. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
7
Activity Limitation Stages empirically derived for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental ADL in the U.S. Adult community-dwelling Medicare population.针对美国成年社区居住医疗保险人群的日常生活活动(ADL)和工具性ADL经验性得出的活动受限阶段。
PM R. 2014 Nov;6(11):976-87; quiz 987. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 2.
8
FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX.功能评估:巴氏指数
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5.
9
Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index.
Disabil Rehabil. 2000 Nov 10;22(16):702-15. doi: 10.1080/09638280050191972.
10
The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation.功能独立性测量:一种康复新工具。
Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6-18.