Roseboom Eva, Smit Marcelle D, Groenveld Hessel F, Rienstra Michiel, Maass Alexander H
Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Martini Hospital, 9728 NT Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Nov 18;25(11):403. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2511403. eCollection 2024 Nov.
The selection of an appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) type and implantation strategy involves a myriad of considerations. While transvenous ICDs are standard, the rise of non-transvenous options like subcutaneous ICDs and extravascular ICDs is notable for their lower complication rates. Historical preferences for dual chamber ICDs have shifted to single-chamber ICDs. Single-coil ICDs are preferred for easier extraction, and the use of the DF-4 connector is generally recommended. Cephalic cutdown is the preferred venous access technique, while axillary vein puncture is a viable alternative. The right ventricular apex remains the preferred lead position until further evidence on conduction system pacing emerges. Left-sided, subcutaneous ICD implantation is considered reliable, contingent on specific cases. A meticulous perioperative plan, including antibiotic prophylaxis and an antithrombotic regimen, is crucial for successful implantation.
选择合适的植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)类型和植入策略涉及众多考量因素。虽然经静脉ICD是标准配置,但皮下ICD和血管外ICD等非经静脉选择的兴起因其较低的并发症发生率而值得关注。对双腔ICD的既往偏好已转向单腔ICD。单线圈ICD因易于取出而更受青睐,通常建议使用DF-4连接器。头静脉切开术是首选的静脉通路技术,而腋静脉穿刺是一种可行的替代方法。在关于传导系统起搏的进一步证据出现之前,右心室心尖仍是首选的电极位置。左侧皮下ICD植入在特定情况下被认为是可靠的。精心制定的围手术期计划,包括抗生素预防和抗血栓治疗方案,对于成功植入至关重要。