• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

六种复合炎症指标与静脉溶栓治疗脑卒中患者预后的相关性

Association of Six Complex Inflammatory Indicators with Prognosis in Patients with Intravenous Thrombolysis Stroke.

作者信息

Li Yinglei, Xi Lingyun, Sun Haichuan, Yu Feifei, Liang Qing, Qie Tao, Dai Bing

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Baoding NO.1 Central Hospital, Baoding, People's Republic of China.

Department of Laboratory and Pathology, The Hospital of 82nd Group Army PLA, Baoding, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Gen Med. 2024 Nov 26;17:5511-5521. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S489482. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S489482
PMID:39619134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11608057/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to examine the correlation between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) with the outcome following 3 months of thrombolysis in individuals diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 762 patients who received intravenous thrombolysis between January 2019 and December 2022. The values of NLR, PLR, LMR, SII, SIRI and PIV were calculated based on relevant blood indices obtained upon admission. Logistic regression analysis using R software was employed to examine the correlation between SIRI, SII, PIV, and poor prognosis following 3 months of thrombolysis, with their distribution analyzed across the study population and various outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to analyze and evaluate their predictive efficacy for adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

The unfavorable prognosis group exhibited significant differences from the favorable prognosis group in various hematological markers, including PLR, NLR, LMR, SII, SIRI, and PIV, as indicated by ROC values of 0.613 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.564-0.661), 0.707 (95% CI, 0.663-0.751), 0.614 (95% CI, 0.567-0.662), 0.715 (95% CI, 672-0.758), 0.631 (95% CI, 0.584-0.679), and 0.569 (95% CI, 0.520-0.619) respectively. (4) Conclusions: PLR, NLR, LMR, SII, SIRI, and PIV demonstrated associations with adverse outcomes at the 3-month mark in patients who underwent intravenous thrombolysis, with NLR (ROC is 0.707) and SII (ROC is 0.715) showing the most pronounced significance and PIV (ROC is 0.569) exhibiting the least significance.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)、全身免疫炎症指数(SII)、全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)和全免疫炎症值(PIV)与急性缺血性中风患者溶栓3个月后的预后之间的相关性。

方法

对2019年1月至2022年12月期间接受静脉溶栓治疗的762例患者进行回顾性分析。根据入院时获得的相关血液指标计算NLR、PLR、LMR、SII、SIRI和PIV的值。使用R软件进行逻辑回归分析,以检验SIRI、SII、PIV与溶栓3个月后不良预后之间的相关性,并分析它们在研究人群和各种结局中的分布情况。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析和评估它们对不良结局的预测效能。

结果

不良预后组与良好预后组在包括PLR、NLR、LMR、SII、SIRI和PIV在内的各种血液学指标上存在显著差异,其ROC值分别为0.613(95%置信区间(CI),0.564 - 0.661)、0.707(95%CI,0.663 - 0.751)、0.614(95%CI,0.567 - 0.662)、0.715(95%CI,672 - 0.758)、0.631(95%CI,0.584 - 0.679)和0.569(95%CI,0.520 - 0.619)。(4)结论:PLR、NLR、LMR、SII、SIRI和PIV与接受静脉溶栓治疗患者3个月时的不良结局相关,其中NLR(ROC为0.707)和SII(ROC为0.715)显示出最显著的意义,而PIV(ROC为0.569)显示出的意义最小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bde/11608057/5047bc505e3c/IJGM-17-5511-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bde/11608057/c6d7c6e8dd86/IJGM-17-5511-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bde/11608057/5f05febd4dd1/IJGM-17-5511-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bde/11608057/cd00fbd86b6d/IJGM-17-5511-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bde/11608057/b6de6a8c880f/IJGM-17-5511-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bde/11608057/5047bc505e3c/IJGM-17-5511-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bde/11608057/c6d7c6e8dd86/IJGM-17-5511-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bde/11608057/5f05febd4dd1/IJGM-17-5511-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bde/11608057/cd00fbd86b6d/IJGM-17-5511-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bde/11608057/b6de6a8c880f/IJGM-17-5511-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bde/11608057/5047bc505e3c/IJGM-17-5511-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of Six Complex Inflammatory Indicators with Prognosis in Patients with Intravenous Thrombolysis Stroke.六种复合炎症指标与静脉溶栓治疗脑卒中患者预后的相关性
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Nov 26;17:5511-5521. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S489482. eCollection 2024.
2
The Association of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Systemic Inflammation Response Index with Short-Term Functional Outcome in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值、淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值及全身炎症反应指数与短期功能预后的相关性
J Inflamm Res. 2023 Aug 23;16:3619-3630. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S418106. eCollection 2023.
3
The predictive role of composite inflammatory ratio parameters in the conscious awareness recovery after severe acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study.复合炎症比率参数在严重急性缺血性卒中后意识恢复中的预测作用:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Neurol. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-04016-0.
4
Associations of Inflammatory Markers With Neurological Dysfunction and Prognosis in Patients With Progressive Stroke.进展性卒中患者炎症标志物与神经功能障碍及预后的关系
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Feb;32(2):e70080. doi: 10.1111/ene.70080.
5
Pan-Immune-Inflammatory Value Predicts the 3 Months Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients after Intravenous Thrombolysis.全免疫炎症标志物预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓后 3 个月结局。
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2023;20(4):464-471. doi: 10.2174/0115672026276427231024045957.
6
The role of first trimester serum inflammatory indexes (NLR, PLR, MLR, SII, SIRI, and PIV) and the β-hCG to PAPP-A ratio in predicting preeclampsia.孕早期血清炎症指标(中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值、全身免疫炎症指数、系统性免疫炎症反应指数和血小板炎症值)及β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素与妊娠相关血浆蛋白A比值在预测子痫前期中的作用。
J Reprod Immunol. 2024 Mar;162:104190. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2023.104190. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
7
PAN-Immune inflammation value: a new biomarker for diagnosing appendicitis in children??全免疫炎症值:一种用于诊断儿童阑尾炎的新生物标志物??
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Mar 4;25(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05544-5.
8
Association of systemic immune biomarkers with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a cross-sectional study of NHANES 2007-2018.全身免疫生物标志物与代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病的关联:一项基于2007 - 2018年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的横断面研究
Front Nutr. 2024 Sep 4;11:1415484. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1415484. eCollection 2024.
9
The clinical value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) for predicting the occurrence and severity of pneumonia in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、全身免疫炎症指数(SII)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)预测脑出血患者肺炎发生和严重程度的临床价值。
Front Immunol. 2023 Feb 13;14:1115031. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1115031. eCollection 2023.
10
[Relationship between preoperative inflammatory indexes and prognosis of patients with rectal cancer and establishment of prognostic nomogram prediction model].[直肠癌患者术前炎症指标与预后的关系及预后列线图预测模型的建立]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022 May 23;44(5):402-409. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20200630-00612.

本文引用的文献

1
Golden Hour Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.黄金时间静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Neurol. 2024 Sep;96(3):582-590. doi: 10.1002/ana.27007. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
2
Effects of peripheral blood cells on ischemic stroke: Greater immune response or systemic inflammation?外周血细胞对缺血性脑卒中的影响:更强的免疫反应还是全身性炎症?
Heliyon. 2024 May 29;10(11):e32171. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32171. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
3
Stroke.中风。
Lancet. 2024 Jun 29;403(10446):2820-2836. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00642-1. Epub 2024 May 14.
4
Time to Treatment With Intravenous Thrombolysis Before Thrombectomy and Functional Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.静脉溶栓治疗时间与急性缺血性脑卒中取栓治疗后功能结局的关系:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2024 Mar 5;331(9):764-777. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0589.
5
Pan-Immune-Inflammatory Value Predicts the 3 Months Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients after Intravenous Thrombolysis.全免疫炎症标志物预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓后 3 个月结局。
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2023;20(4):464-471. doi: 10.2174/0115672026276427231024045957.
6
The relationship between systemic inflammation index, systemic immune-inflammatory index, and inflammatory prognostic index and 90-day outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis.全身炎症指数、全身免疫炎症指数和炎症预后指数与接受静脉溶栓治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者 90 天结局的关系。
J Neuroinflammation. 2023 Sep 30;20(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12974-023-02890-y.
7
Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence.人工智能时代的科学发现。
Nature. 2023 Aug;620(7972):47-60. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
8
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and its changes predict the 3-month outcome and mortality in acute ischemic stroke patients after intravenous thrombolysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及其变化可预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓后 3 个月的结局和死亡率。
Brain Behav. 2023 Sep;13(9):e3162. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3162. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
9
China stroke surveillance report 2021.中国卒中监测报告 2021。
Mil Med Res. 2023 Jul 19;10(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40779-023-00463-x.
10
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: current status and future perspectives.急性缺血性脑卒中的溶栓治疗:现状与未来展望。
Lancet Neurol. 2023 May;22(5):418-429. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00519-1. Epub 2023 Mar 9.