Wong Eileen M, Maclean Stephanie
Departments of Family Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Can Geriatr J. 2024 Dec 1;27(4):430-437. doi: 10.5770/cgj.27.764. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Patient health is greatly impacted by increased likelihood of malnutrition if food is not consumed. Food waste also contributes to greenhouse gas emissions and may be possibly reduced by offering vegetarian food options. Therefore, a Plan-Do-Study-Act intervention of "Vegetarian Week" was conducted in an urban geriatric rehabilitation unit.
Food waste was measured using the Visual Estimation Method, and the proportion of waste before and after the intervention was compared using a two-tailed -test. Surveys assessed patients' attitudes towards vegetarian meals.
Study population was of 54 (2022) and 65 (2023) patients with the majority being male (62.5%), average age 74.5 years, average length of stay 33 days. Comparing pre- and post-intervention periods, overall food wastage increased at: breakfast (22% to 32%), lunch (22% to 32%), and dinner (20% to 25%) with values <.001. Considering lunch entrées only, wastage increased from 17% to 38%, with vegetarian entrees wasted (46%) more than non-vegetarian ones (34%). Vegetarian patients wasted (37%) as much as non-vegetarians (39%). Survey response rate pre-PDSA was 45%, with most patients (76%) reporting eating an omnivorous diet, a prior awareness of personal and planetary health benefits of vegetarian diets (59%), and previously trying vegetarian dishes (62%). Post-PDSA survey response rate was lower (22%) with 57% not willing to try vegetarian dishes again.
Through evaluation of the patient food experience with Visual Estimation Method and surveys, the very complex issue of food satisfaction was explored in older adults. Although food waste was not decreased during this "Vegetarian Week" pilot, improving patient and planetary health requires ongoing efforts.
如果食物未被食用,营养不良的可能性增加会对患者健康产生重大影响。食物浪费还会导致温室气体排放,提供素食选择可能会减少食物浪费。因此,在一个城市老年康复单元开展了一项“素食周”的计划-执行-研究-行动干预。
使用视觉估计法测量食物浪费情况,并使用双侧检验比较干预前后的浪费比例。通过调查评估患者对素食餐的态度。
研究对象包括2022年的54名患者和2023年的65名患者,大多数为男性(62.5%),平均年龄74.5岁,平均住院时间33天。比较干预前后,早餐(从22%增至32%)、午餐(从22%增至32%)和晚餐(从20%增至25%)的总体食物浪费均增加,P值<0.001。仅考虑午餐主菜,浪费率从17%增至38%,素食主菜的浪费率(46%)高于非素食主菜(34%)。素食患者的浪费率(37%)与非素食患者(39%)相当。计划-执行-研究-行动前的调查回复率为45%,大多数患者(76%)报告饮食杂食,此前了解素食对个人和地球健康的益处(59%),且此前尝试过素食菜肴(62%)。计划-执行-研究-行动后的调查回复率较低(22%),57%的患者不愿意再次尝试素食菜肴。
通过视觉估计法和调查评估患者的食物体验,探讨了老年人食物满意度这一非常复杂的问题。尽管在这次“素食周”试点期间食物浪费并未减少,但改善患者和地球健康仍需持续努力。