Linke Lily, Clements Christopher F
School of Biological Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK.
Ecol Evol. 2024 Nov 28;14(12):e70653. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70653. eCollection 2024 Dec.
The term 'sixth mass extinction' has become synonymous with the current biodiversity crisis. However, despite a general agreement that current biodiversity declines are severe, no consensus has been reached on whether this constitutes a 'mass extinction event', and thus, whether our current situation is comparable to the catastrophic extinction events of deep time. Here, we suggest that our inability to gauge whether the current biodiversity crisis is a mass extinction event may lie less in quantifiable evidence and more in the language used to define such events. We highlight areas of linguistic contention, vagueness and epistemic dispute, and discuss the role of post hoc decision-making and language in shaping our understanding and communication of biodiversity loss. Our discussion raises larger questions about how we communicate science to the public, funders and other scientists, and how we use language to both shape awareness and leverage action.
“第六次物种大灭绝”一词已成为当前生物多样性危机的代名词。然而,尽管人们普遍认为当前生物多样性的下降十分严重,但对于这是否构成“物种大灭绝事件”,以及我们当前的情况是否可与远古时期的灾难性灭绝事件相提并论,尚未达成共识。在此,我们认为,我们无法判断当前的生物多样性危机是否为物种大灭绝事件,可能并非在于可量化的证据,而更多地在于用于定义此类事件的语言。我们强调了语言方面存在争议、模糊及认知分歧的领域,并讨论了事后决策和语言在塑造我们对生物多样性丧失的理解及交流方面所起的作用。我们的讨论引发了一些更大的问题,比如我们如何向公众、资助者及其他科学家传播科学,以及我们如何运用语言来塑造意识并推动行动。