Suppr超能文献

在基因组选择计划中使用孟德尔抽样方差进行选择决策时的实际考量。

Practical Considerations When Using Mendelian Sampling Variances for Selection Decisions in Genomic Selection Programs.

作者信息

Niehoff Tobias A M, Ten Napel Jan, Calus Mario P L

机构信息

Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Anim Breed Genet. 2025 Jul;142(4):419-437. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12913. Epub 2024 Dec 2.

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to test the application of selection criteria that consider the genetic variances of future generations. This has not been done previously in numerically large livestock breeding programs based on estimated rather than assumed known marker effects. A generic pure-line pig breeding program was simulated in which 40 males and 400 females were selected every generation. Daily gain was used as an example trait. Three variance-considering criteria as well as different reference population sizes were compared to investigate the effect of differences in genomic prediction accuracy on selection decisions. All variance-considering criteria retained more genetic variance than if selection was based on estimated breeding values (max. 20%). This effect was more pronounced for higher prediction accuracies and criteria assessing the variance more generations ahead. After 20 generations, the criterion with the longest planning horizon combined with the largest reference population resulted in a 2% higher genetic level of boars selected to produce finisher pigs. While the advantage of accounting for future generations diminished with lower accuracy or shorter planning horizons, the variance-considering criteria never performed worse than selection based on genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) with respect to commercial genetic gain. We are reporting various accuracy metrics to help judge the effectiveness of using one of our tested criteria in real breeding programs. While we did not find large benefits for genetic gain when considering future variances in selection decisions, we also did not find negative side effects, while considerably more genetic variance was maintained. This means that using variance-considering criteria results in either equally good or better performance than truncation selection based on estimated breeding values. Our criteria can be applied to any genomic breeding program as long as phased genotypes, estimated marker effects and a genetic map are available.

摘要

这项工作的目的是测试考虑后代遗传方差的选择标准的应用。此前在基于估计而非假定已知标记效应的大规模家畜育种计划中尚未进行过此类测试。模拟了一个通用的纯系猪育种计划,每代选择40头公猪和400头母猪。以日增重作为示例性状。比较了三种考虑方差的标准以及不同的参考群体大小,以研究基因组预测准确性差异对选择决策的影响。所有考虑方差的标准保留的遗传方差均比基于估计育种值的选择(最高20%)更多。对于更高的预测准确性以及评估更后代方差的标准,这种效应更为明显。经过20代后,规划期最长且参考群体最大的标准使得用于生产育肥猪的公猪遗传水平提高了2%。虽然随着准确性降低或规划期缩短,考虑后代的优势会减弱,但就商业遗传增益而言,考虑方差的标准的表现从未比基于基因组估计育种值(GEBV)的选择更差。我们报告了各种准确性指标,以帮助判断在实际育种计划中使用我们测试的标准之一的有效性。虽然我们在选择决策中考虑未来方差时未发现对遗传增益有很大益处,但也未发现负面副作用,同时保持了更多的遗传方差。这意味着使用考虑方差的标准的表现与基于估计育种值的截断选择一样好或更好。只要有分阶段的基因型、估计的标记效应和遗传图谱,我们的标准就可以应用于任何基因组育种计划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验