Dennis Michael L, Sitar Siara I, Modisette Kathryn C, Estrada Barbara D, Welsh Justine W
GAIN Coordinating Center, Lighthouse Institute, Chestnut Health Systems, Normal, IL (MLD, KCM, BDE); and Emory Addiction Center, Atlanta, GA (SIS, JWW).
J Addict Med. 2025;19(3):298-305. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001413. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
This article describes the development and evaluation of the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs Quick Version 4 (GAIN-Q4) for the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) 4th edition patient placement dimension ratings and level of care placement recommendations. The research questions are as follows: (1) Can the GAIN-Q4 replicate recommendations from the prior longer instrument within adolescents and adults? (2) What are the substantive differences in the results by age?
The 35- to 45-minute GAIN-Q4 was developed through modification of the GAIN-Q3 and evaluated in terms of its ability to predict ASAM dimensional ratings and level of care placement recommendations from the 60- to 120-minute GAIN-I instrument. Data were obtained from participants who are adolescents aged 12 to 17 years (n = 101,897) and adults 18 years and older (n = 204,711) interviewed between 2002 and 2018 across 530 US sites. Reliability between measures was assessed with Cohen's κ statistic within age group; substantive differences by age were evaluated with logistic regression and χ 2 .
The ability of the 35- to 45-minute GAIN-Q4 measure to predict ASAM 6 dimensional ratings from the 60- to 120-minute GAIN-I was excellent ( κ > 0.8) for 4 dimensions, good (0.6-0.79) for 1, and fair for 1 (0.4-0.59) - both for adolescents and young adults. κ for general level of care placement to ASAM levels of care was excellent for both adolescents and young adults.
The GAIN-Q4 demonstrates the ability to predict ASAM dimensional ratings and general level of care placement reliably when compared to the lengthier GAIN-I measure. These results highlight that clinicians using the GAIN-Q4 measure will be equipped to evaluate patients from a wide variety of sources with an accurate and reliable screening tool.
本文介绍了美国成瘾医学协会(ASAM)第4版患者安置维度评级和护理级别安置建议的全球个体需求快速评估第4版(GAIN-Q4)的开发与评估。研究问题如下:(1)GAIN-Q4能否在青少年和成年人中复制先前较长工具的建议?(2)按年龄划分,结果的实质性差异是什么?
通过对GAIN-Q3进行修改,开发了时长35至45分钟的GAIN-Q4,并根据其预测ASAM维度评级和护理级别安置建议的能力进行评估,这些建议来自时长60至120分钟的GAIN-I工具。数据来自2002年至2018年期间在美国530个地点接受访谈的12至17岁青少年(n = 101,897)和18岁及以上成年人(n = 204,711)。在年龄组内使用科恩κ统计量评估测量之间的可靠性;通过逻辑回归和χ2评估按年龄划分的实质性差异。
对于青少年和年轻人,时长35至45分钟的GAIN-Q4测量从时长60至120分钟的GAIN-I预测ASAM 6维度评级的能力,在4个维度上表现出色(κ> 0.8),在1个维度上表现良好(0.6 - 0.79),在1个维度上表现一般(0.4 - 0.59)。对于青少年和年轻人,GAIN-Q4总体护理级别安置与ASAM护理级别之间的κ均表现出色。
与更长的GAIN-I测量相比,GAIN-Q4证明了能够可靠地预测ASAM维度评级和总体护理级别安置。这些结果表明,使用GAIN-Q4测量的临床医生将能够使用准确可靠的筛查工具评估来自各种来源的患者。