• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于改进的DRASTIC方法,利用机器学习模型提升地下水资源质量预测能力。

Enhancement of groundwater resources quality prediction by machine learning models on the basis of an improved DRASTIC method.

作者信息

Bakhtiarizadeh Ali, Najafzadeh Mohammad, Mohamadi Sedigheh

机构信息

Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Surveying Engineering, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, 76315117, Iran.

Department of Ecology, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, 76315117, Iran.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 2;14(1):29933. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78812-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-78812-6
PMID:39622912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11612303/
Abstract

Determining situation of groundwater vulnerability plays a crucial role in studying the groundwater resource management. Generally, the preparation of reliable groundwater vulnerability maps provides targeted and practical scientific measures for the protection and management of groundwater resources. In this study, in order to evaluate the groundwater vulnerability of Kerman-Baghin plain aquifer, two developed indicators including composite DRASTIC index (CD) and nitrate vulnerability index (NVI) based on DRASTIC index were considered. Soft computing methods, including Gene Expression Programming (GEP), Evolutionary Polynomial Regression (EPR), Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (MARS), and M5 Model Tree (MTM5) have been used to provide formulations for prediction of NVI. Soft computing techniques were fed nine input parameters: depth to water level, net recharge, aquifer environment, soil environment, topography, effect of unsaturated area, hydraulic conductivity, land use, and potential risk related to land use. After calculating the vulnerability by soft computing methods, the results showed that the EPR model with Correlation Coefficient (R) of 0.9999 and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) = 0.2105 has the best performance in the testing stage in comparison with MARS (R = 0.9966 and RMSE = 2.408), M5MT (R = 0.9956 and RMSE = 2.988), and GEP (R = 0.9920 and RMSE = 3.491). Although the EPR and GEP models have more complex mathematical computations than other soft computing models, the MARS and MT model that have quadratic polynomial and multivariable linear structures respectively, can be considered as the best alternative. According to the MARS model, the vulnerability of the region is divided into two categories: very low vulnerability (73.06%) and low vulnerability (26.94%). Overall, the statistical results of soft computing techniques were indicative of effective formulations for evaluating the DRASTIC index.

摘要

确定地下水脆弱性状况在研究地下水资源管理中起着至关重要的作用。一般来说,编制可靠的地下水脆弱性图可为地下水资源的保护和管理提供有针对性且切实可行的科学措施。在本研究中,为评估克尔曼 - 巴欣平原含水层的地下水脆弱性,考虑了两个开发的指标,即基于DRASTIC指标的综合DRASTIC指数(CD)和硝酸盐脆弱性指数(NVI)。已使用包括基因表达式编程(GEP)、进化多项式回归(EPR)、多元自适应回归样条(MARS)和M5模型树(MTM5)在内的软计算方法来提供预测NVI的公式。软计算技术输入了九个参数:水位深度、净补给量、含水层环境、土壤环境、地形、非饱和区影响、水力传导率、土地利用以及与土地利用相关的潜在风险。通过软计算方法计算脆弱性后,结果表明,与MARS(R = 0.9966,均方根误差RMSE = 2.408)、M5MT(R = 0.9956,RMSE = 2.988)和GEP(R = 0.9920,RMSE = 3.491)相比,相关系数(R)为0.9999且均方根误差(RMSE)= 0.2105的EPR模型在测试阶段表现最佳。尽管EPR和GEP模型的数学计算比其他软计算模型更复杂,但分别具有二次多项式和多变量线性结构的MARS和MT模型可被视为最佳替代方案。根据MARS模型,该地区的脆弱性分为两类:极低脆弱性(73.06%)和低脆弱性(26.94%)。总体而言,软计算技术的统计结果表明其在评估DRASTIC指数方面有有效的公式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/7ff53ad3d0ce/41598_2024_78812_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/e6313ad0b0f0/41598_2024_78812_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/7312e23a490b/41598_2024_78812_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/0fbfc4b41306/41598_2024_78812_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/3c86aaf4d570/41598_2024_78812_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/93e8fdabc321/41598_2024_78812_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/b77a3bdd3e88/41598_2024_78812_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/e1245ae6efe6/41598_2024_78812_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/67f832d7564a/41598_2024_78812_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/7ff53ad3d0ce/41598_2024_78812_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/e6313ad0b0f0/41598_2024_78812_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/7312e23a490b/41598_2024_78812_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/0fbfc4b41306/41598_2024_78812_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/3c86aaf4d570/41598_2024_78812_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/93e8fdabc321/41598_2024_78812_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/b77a3bdd3e88/41598_2024_78812_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/e1245ae6efe6/41598_2024_78812_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/67f832d7564a/41598_2024_78812_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/11612303/7ff53ad3d0ce/41598_2024_78812_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhancement of groundwater resources quality prediction by machine learning models on the basis of an improved DRASTIC method.基于改进的DRASTIC方法,利用机器学习模型提升地下水资源质量预测能力。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 2;14(1):29933. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78812-6.
2
Optimization of DRASTIC method by artificial neural network, nitrate vulnerability index, and composite DRASTIC models to assess groundwater vulnerability for unconfined aquifer of Shiraz Plain, Iran.通过人工神经网络、硝酸盐脆弱性指数和综合 DRASTIC 模型优化 DRASTIC 方法,评估伊朗设拉子平原无约束含水层的地下水脆弱性。
J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2016 Aug 9;14:13. doi: 10.1186/s40201-016-0254-y. eCollection 2016.
3
Modelling hydrogeological parameters to assess groundwater pollution and vulnerability in Kashan aquifer: Novel calibration-validation of multivariate statistical methods and human health risk considerations.建立水文地质参数模型以评估卡尚含水层的地下水污染和脆弱性:多变量统计方法的新型校准-验证和人类健康风险考虑。
Environ Res. 2022 Aug;211:113028. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113028. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
ANFIS-MOA models for the assessment of groundwater contamination vulnerability in a nitrate contaminated area.基于 ANFIS-MOA 模型的硝酸盐污染区地下水脆弱性评价
J Environ Manage. 2021 May 15;286:112162. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112162. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
5
Groundwater vulnerability assessment in agricultural areas using a modified DRASTIC model.利用改进的DRASTIC模型对农业地区地下水脆弱性进行评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Jan;188(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4915-6. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
6
Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in an urban area: a comparative study based on DRASTIC, EBF, and LR models.城市地区地下水脆弱性评估:基于 DRASTIC、EBF 和 LR 模型的比较研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(48):72908-72928. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20767-0. Epub 2022 May 26.
7
Groundwater vulnerability and contamination risk mapping of semi-arid Totko river basin, India using GIS-based DRASTIC model and AHP techniques.利用 GIS 支持的 DRASTIC 模型和层次分析法技术对印度半干旱的托特科河流域的地下水脆弱性和污染风险进行制图。
Chemosphere. 2022 Nov;307(Pt 2):135831. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135831. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
8
A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan.基于地理信息系统的DRASTIC模型,用于评估日本中部岐阜县各务原高地的含水层脆弱性。
Sci Total Environ. 2005 Jun 1;345(1-3):127-40. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.11.005. Epub 2005 Jan 21.
9
Groundwater vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and Pesticide DRASTIC models in intense agriculture area of the Gangetic plains, India.利用 DRASTIC 和农药 DRASTIC 模型对印度恒河平原高强度农业区的地下水脆弱性进行评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2014 Dec;186(12):8741-63. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-4041-x. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
10
A GIS-based approach for geospatial modeling of groundwater vulnerability and pollution risk mapping in Bou-Areg and Gareb aquifers, northeastern Morocco.基于 GIS 的摩洛哥东北部布阿雷格和加拉布含水层地下水脆弱性和污染风险制图的空间建模方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(37):51612-51631. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14336-0. Epub 2021 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of machine learning models for detecting water quality anomalies in treatment plants.用于检测污水处理厂水质异常的机器学习模型的比较分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 19;15(1):30453. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15517-4.
2
Investigating factors affecting the quality of water resources by multivariate analysis and soft computing approaches.运用多元分析和软计算方法研究影响水资源质量的因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 7;15(1):28925. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13380-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing groundwater vulnerability assessment: Comparative study of three machine learning models and five classification schemes for Cuddalore district.增强地下水脆弱性评估:三种机器学习模型和五种分类方案在库达洛尔地区的比较研究。
Environ Res. 2024 Feb 1;242:117769. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117769. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
2
Decline in Iran's groundwater recharge.伊朗地下水补给量下降。
Nat Commun. 2023 Oct 21;14(1):6674. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42411-2.
3
Hotspot and accumulated hotspot analysis for assessment of groundwater quality and pollution indices using GIS in the arid region of Iran.
利用 GIS 对伊朗干旱地区地下水质量和污染指数进行热点和累积热点分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(27):69955-69976. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27177-w. Epub 2023 May 4.
4
Novel machine learning algorithms to predict the groundwater vulnerability index to nitrate pollution at two levels of modeling.用于在两个建模层面预测地下水对硝酸盐污染的脆弱性指数的新型机器学习算法。
Chemosphere. 2023 Feb;314:137671. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137671. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
5
Comparative study of machine learning models for evaluating groundwater vulnerability to nitrate contamination.机器学习模型评估地下水硝酸盐污染脆弱性的比较研究。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022 Jan 1;229:113061. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113061. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
6
A study of uncertainties in groundwater vulnerability modelling using Bayesian model averaging (BMA).基于贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)的地下水脆弱性建模不确定性研究。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 1;303:114168. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114168. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
7
Anthropogenic depletion of Iran's aquifers.人为消耗伊朗含水层。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 22;118(25). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024221118.
8
A GIS-based groundwater pollution potential using DRASTIC, modified DRASTIC, and bivariate statistical models.基于 GIS 的地下水污染潜力的 DRASTIC、修正 DRASTIC 和二元统计模型的应用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(36):50525-50541. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13706-y. Epub 2021 May 7.
9
Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using genetic algorithm and random forest methods (case study: Miandoab plain, NW of Iran).基于遗传算法和随机森林方法的地下水脆弱性评估(以伊朗西北部米安德阿布平原为例)。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(29):39598-39613. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12714-2. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
10
The prediction of aquifer groundwater level based on spatial clustering approach using machine learning.基于空间聚类方法和机器学习的含水层地下水位预测。
Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Mar 9;193(4):173. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-08961-y.