De Potter Tom J R, Buytaert Dimitri, Valeriano Chiara, Addeo Lucio, Babkin Alex, Ector Joris
Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Arrhythmia Unit, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Dec 2. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01952-2.
Clinical experience during trans-patch ventricular ablations shows difficult lesion formation when using standard RF ablation technology. The aim of this exploratory study is to test if ultralow temperature cryoblation (ULTC) technology could be suitable for trans-patch ventricular ablations.
Ex vivo ablations were performed on 16 porcine tenderloin specimens of 5 × 7 × 3 cm, eight with and eight without pericardial patch (Supple Peri-Guard Repair Patch, Baxter, USA). RF energy was applied for 1 min, with a power of 40W. ULTC was applied as a 2 × 2 min freeze. Temperature was measured using an array of thermocouples ranging between 0.5 and 13.1 mm below the tissue surface.
For RF, the maximum temperatures without and with patch respectively reached 58.9 °C and 48.5 °C. The thermocouple closest to the tissue surface displayed a 41% temperature range drop when RF energy was applied trans-patch, whereas the same thermocouple showed a 16% and 13% drop for the first and second ULTC freeze cycle when ULTC was applied trans-patch. The 45 °C isotherm depth was reduced by 55% for RF ablations, whereas the - 25 °C isotherm depth was reduced by 23% and 19% for the first and second freeze cycles, respectively.
Both energy modalities show reduced efficacy for trans-patch ablations when considering absolute temperature differences and estimated lesion depths. However, when considering relative differences, ULTC is more effective than RF for trans-patch lesions. Additionally, ULTC did not show visible damage to either the patch or the ex vivo specimen, while RF resulted in visible damage to both the tissue and patch.
经补片心室消融的临床经验表明,使用标准射频消融技术时病变形成困难。本探索性研究的目的是测试超低温冷冻消融(ULTC)技术是否适用于经补片心室消融。
对16个5×7×3 cm的猪里脊肉标本进行离体消融,其中8个有心脏补片(美国百特公司的Supple Peri-Guard修复补片),8个没有。施加射频能量1分钟,功率为40W。ULTC采用2×2分钟的冷冻。使用一系列热电偶在组织表面以下0.5至13.1 mm处测量温度。
对于射频消融,无补片和有补片时的最高温度分别达到58.9°C和48.5°C。当经补片施加射频能量时,最靠近组织表面的热电偶显示温度范围下降41%,而当经补片施加ULTC时,同一热电偶在第一次和第二次ULTC冷冻周期中分别下降16%和13%。射频消融时45°C等温线深度减少55%,而第一次和第二次冷冻周期中-25°C等温线深度分别减少23%和19%。
考虑绝对温度差异和估计的病变深度时,两种能量模式在经补片消融中的疗效均降低。然而,考虑相对差异时,ULTC在经补片病变方面比射频更有效。此外,ULTC对补片或离体标本均未显示可见损伤,而射频对组织和补片均造成了可见损伤。