Feasibility of position emission tomography derived endocardial wall strain: direct comparison with magnetic resonance using hybrid N ammonia PETMR system.

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of positron emission tomography feature tracking (PETFT) for assessing endocardial wall strain by comparing it with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived feature tracking (CMRFT).

METHODS

We enrolled 83 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease who underwent rest-pharmacologic stress N-ammonia PETMR (67 males, mean age 66 years). PETFT and CMRFT were obtained through simultaneous acquisition with electrocardiography-gated PET and cine-CMR. Global longitudinal and circumferential strain (GLS and GCS) were calculated. Correlations and Bland-Altman plots were employed to evaluate associations, bias, and 95% limit of agreement (LOA) between PETFT and CMRFT.

RESULTS

PETFT and CMRFT showed significant correlations (R = 0.57 [95% CI 0.41-0.70], R = 0.71 [95% CI 0.58-0.80], R = 0.59 [95% CI 0.43-0.71], and R = 0.69 [95% CI 0.56-0.79] for rest GLS, rest GCS, stress GLS, and stress GCS, respectively; p < 0.001 for all). Bland-Altman plot showed good agreements, while a systematic error was observed (LOA -10.2-8.8, -8.7-10.7, -10.5-8.5, and -9.4-12.0; bias -0.7, 1.0, -1.0, and 1.3; for rest GLS, rest GCS, stress GLS, and stress GCS; respectively).

CONCLUSION

PETFT has been identified as a feasible technique compared to CMRFT, highlighting its potential as a novel tool for assessing wall strain in routine clinical settings.