• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在印度建立医疗保健相关血流感染监测网络:关于最佳实践、挑战与机遇的混合方法研究,2022年

Implementing a healthcare-associated bloodstream infection surveillance network in India: a mixed-methods study on the best practices, challenges and opportunities, 2022.

作者信息

Vedachalam Srividya K, Siromany Valan A, VanderEnde Daniel, Malpiedi Paul, Vasquez Amber, Dikid Tanzin, Walia Kamini, Mathur Purva

机构信息

India Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) Cell, National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC), New Delhi, India.

South Asia Field Epidemiology and Technology Network (SAFETYNET), New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Dec 2;13(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01501-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13756-024-01501-6
PMID:39623512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11610118/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare-associated bloodstream infections (BSI) threaten patient safety and are the third most common healthcare-associated infection (HAI) in low- and middle-income countries. An intensive-care-unit (ICU) based HAI surveillance network recording BSIs was started in India in 2017. We evaluated this surveillance network's ability to detect BSI to identify best practices, challenges, and opportunities in its implementation.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods descriptive study from January to May 2022 using the CDC guidelines for evaluation. We focused on hospitals reporting BSI surveillance data to the HAI network from May 2017 to December 2021, and collected data through interviews, surveys, record reviews, and site visits. We integrated quantitative and qualitative results and present mixed methods interpretation.

RESULTS

The HAI surveillance network included 39 hospitals across 22 states of India. We conducted 13 interviews, four site visits, and one focus-group discussion and collected 50 survey responses. Respondents included network coordinators, surveillance staff, data entry operators, and ICU physicians. Among surveyed staff, 83% rated the case definitions simple to use. Case definitions were correctly applied in 280/284 (98%) case reports. Among 21 site records reviewed, 24% reported using paper-based forms for laboratory reporting. Interviewees reported challenges, including funding, limited human resources, lack of digitalization, variable blood culture practices, and inconsistent information sharing.

CONCLUSION

Implementing a standardized HAI surveillance network reporting BSIs in India has been successful, and the case definitions developed were simple. Allocating personnel, digitalizing medical records, improving culturing practices, establishing feedback mechanisms, and funding commitment are crucial for its sustainability.

摘要

背景

医疗保健相关血流感染(BSI)威胁患者安全,是低收入和中等收入国家中第三常见的医疗保健相关感染(HAI)。2017年在印度启动了一个基于重症监护病房(ICU)的HAI监测网络,用于记录BSI。我们评估了该监测网络检测BSI的能力,以确定其实施过程中的最佳实践、挑战和机遇。

方法

我们于2022年1月至5月采用美国疾病控制与预防中心的评估指南进行了一项混合方法描述性研究。我们关注2017年5月至2021年12月期间向HAI网络报告BSI监测数据的医院,并通过访谈、调查、记录审查和实地考察收集数据。我们整合了定量和定性结果,并进行了混合方法解读。

结果

HAI监测网络包括印度22个邦的39家医院。我们进行了13次访谈、4次实地考察和1次焦点小组讨论,并收集了50份调查回复。受访者包括网络协调员、监测人员、数据录入操作员和ICU医生。在接受调查的工作人员中,83%认为病例定义易于使用。284份病例报告中有280份(98%)正确应用了病例定义。在审查的21份现场记录中,24%报告使用纸质表格进行实验室报告。受访者报告了一些挑战,包括资金、人力资源有限、缺乏数字化、血培养操作不一以及信息共享不一致。

结论

在印度实施一个报告BSI的标准化HAI监测网络已取得成功,所制定的病例定义很简单。分配人员、将病历数字化、改进培养操作、建立反馈机制和资金投入对其可持续性至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0038/11610118/5ae3747716ea/13756_2024_1501_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0038/11610118/22c4eb119fbc/13756_2024_1501_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0038/11610118/5ae3747716ea/13756_2024_1501_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0038/11610118/22c4eb119fbc/13756_2024_1501_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0038/11610118/5ae3747716ea/13756_2024_1501_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementing a healthcare-associated bloodstream infection surveillance network in India: a mixed-methods study on the best practices, challenges and opportunities, 2022.在印度建立医疗保健相关血流感染监测网络:关于最佳实践、挑战与机遇的混合方法研究,2022年
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Dec 2;13(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01501-6.
2
Health-care-associated bloodstream and urinary tract infections in a network of hospitals in India: a multicentre, hospital-based, prospective surveillance study.印度联网医院的医源性血流感染和尿路感染:一项多中心、以医院为基础、前瞻性监测研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Sep;10(9):e1317-e1325. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00274-1.
3
An outbreak of bloodstream infections in a tertiary-care facility in northern India detected by a healthcare-associated infection surveillance network.印度北部一家三级医疗机构中,由医疗相关感染监测网络检测到的血流感染暴发。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;44(3):467-473. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.111. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
4
Prospective surveillance of device-associated health care-associated infection in an intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India.印度新德里一家三级医院重症监护病房医疗器械相关和卫生保健相关感染的前瞻性监测。
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Feb;46(2):202-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.08.037. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
5
International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) resources: INICC multidimensional approach and INICC surveillance online system.国际医院感染控制联盟(INICC)资源:INICC多维度方法及INICC在线监测系统
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Jun 1;44(6):e81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
6
Healthcare-Acquired Infection Surveillance in Neurosurgery Patients, Incidence and Microbiology, Five Years of Experience in Two Polish Units.神经外科患者获得性感染监测:发病率和微生物学,波兰两个单位五年经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 20;19(12):7544. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127544.
7
Evaluation of existing and desired measures to monitor, prevent and control healthcare-associated infections in Swiss hospitals.评估瑞士医院现有的和期望的用于监测、预防和控制医源性感染的措施。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 Jul 14;151:w20516. doi: 10.4414/smw.2021.20516. eCollection 2021 Jul 5.
8
Health care-associated infections studies project: An American Journal of Infection Control and National Healthcare Safety Network data quality collaboration.医疗保健相关感染研究项目:《美国感染控制杂志》与国家医疗安全网络的数据质量合作。
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Jun 1;45(6):612-614. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.01.031. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
9
Agreement between CDC/NHSN surveillance definitions and ECDC criteria in diagnosis of healthcare-associated infections in Serbian trauma patients.塞族创伤患者医源性感染的疾控中心/ NHSN 监测定义与 ECDC 标准之间的一致性。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0204893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204893. eCollection 2018.
10
Establishing a Standardized Surveillance System for Health Care-Associated Infections in Vietnam.建立越南卫生保健相关感染的标准化监测系统。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Jun 29;10(3). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00284.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to and enablers of quality improvement in primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家初级卫生保健质量改进的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan 18;4(1):e0002756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002756. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluation of the implementation of WHO infection prevention and control core components in Turkish health care facilities: results from a WHO infection prevention and control assessment framework (IPCAF)-based survey.评估土耳其医疗机构实施世界卫生组织感染预防和控制核心组成部分的情况:基于世界卫生组织感染预防和控制评估框架(IPCAF)的调查结果。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Feb 13;12(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01208-0.
3
Infection prevention and control in Indonesian hospitals: identification of strengths, gaps, and challenges.印度尼西亚医院感染预防与控制:优势、差距和挑战的识别。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Feb 3;12(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01211-5.
4
Infection prevention and control in tertiary care hospitals of Bangladesh: results from WHO infection prevention and control assessment framework (IPCAF).孟加拉国三级保健医院的感染预防和控制:世卫组织感染预防和控制评估框架(IPCAF)的结果。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Oct 6;11(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01161-4.
5
Pitfalls for blood culture diagnostic stewardship. Author's Reply.血培养诊断管理的陷阱。作者回复。
Eur J Intern Med. 2022 Nov;105:102-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
6
Health-care-associated bloodstream and urinary tract infections in a network of hospitals in India: a multicentre, hospital-based, prospective surveillance study.印度联网医院的医源性血流感染和尿路感染:一项多中心、以医院为基础、前瞻性监测研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Sep;10(9):e1317-e1325. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00274-1.
7
Do we need blood culture stewardship programs? A quality control study and survey to assess the appropriateness of blood culture collection and the knowledge and attitudes among physicians in Swiss hospitals.我们是否需要血液培养管理项目?一项质量控制研究和调查,以评估瑞士医院血液培养采集的适宜性以及医生的知识和态度。
Eur J Intern Med. 2022 Sep;103:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.04.028. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
8
An outbreak of bloodstream infections in a tertiary-care facility in northern India detected by a healthcare-associated infection surveillance network.印度北部一家三级医疗机构中,由医疗相关感染监测网络检测到的血流感染暴发。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;44(3):467-473. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.111. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
9
Cost-utility analysis of antimicrobial stewardship programme at a tertiary teaching hospital in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚一家三级教学医院抗菌药物管理项目的成本-效用分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 17;11(12):e047515. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047515.
10
Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in low- and middle-income countries: a scattered picture.中低收入国家抗菌药物耐药性监测:支离破碎的图景。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 Mar 31;10(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-00931-w.