• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

墨西哥医院实施抗菌药物管理计划后,急诊病房、非重症监护病房区域和重症监护病房的细菌耐药情况

Profile of bacterial resistance in emergency wards, non-intensive care unit areas, and intensive care units in Mexican hospitals with the antimicrobial stewardship program.

作者信息

Garza-González Elvira, Nunez-Martinez Marcela Elizabeth, Zuñiga-Mejia Porfirio, Márquez-Monzón Dolores, Morfín-Otero María Del Rayo, Rodríguez-Noriega Eduardo, Castañeda-Méndez Paulo, Ramírez-Rodríguez Jose Manuel, Juárez-Lomelí Alba Guadalupe, Quintanilla-Cazarez Luis Javier, Saldivar-Cornejo Inés, Martínez-Resendez Michel, Ugalde Carlos Vallejo, Lugo-Tavera Miriam, Aguilar Elida González, Morales-Reyes Juan José, Sánchez Itzel Guadalupe Meza, Morales Guillermo Damian Ortega, Navarro-Vargas Norberta Vianay, Vallejo Jose Luis, Peréz Bolde-Villarreal Carlos

机构信息

Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico.

Centro Médico ABC, Observatorio, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

IJID Reg. 2024 Oct 24;13:100474. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100474. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100474
PMID:39624253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11609382/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Bacterial infections are important causes of death. Some reports have shown that the COVID-19 pandemic may have had an impact on drug resistance. The objective of this work was to compare the resistance profiles between 2019 and 2020 in the emergency department, non-intensive care units (ICU), and ICU areas in Mexican hospitals.

METHODS

Databases from 15 hospitals from eight states in Mexico including susceptibility results for and collected from blood, urine, respiratory, and intra-abdominal secretions were analyzed. Different hospital areas were included: emergency department, non-ICU wards, and ICU. The databases were converted using the BacLink2 tool and analyzed using the WHONET 2022 platform. The percentage of antibiotic resistance was compared for each species and clinical specimen between years (2019 vs 2020) by a chi-square test using the criterion of <0.05 for statistical significance.

RESULTS

A statistically significant decrease in resistance to imipenem was observed for recovered from respiratory specimens in the ICU (55.6% vs 39.3%) and from urine samples from non-ICU areas (52.9% vs 37.3%). Also, an increase in resistance was detected in blood isolates from non-ICU areas for carbapenems in imipenem (23.3% vs 54.5%) and meropenem (27.4% vs 49%) and in , ertapenem (2.4% vs 10.1%), imipenem (1.9% vs 13.2%), and meropenem (1.6% vs 6.8%). Furthermore, an increase in resistance forimipenem (20.0% vs 57.5%) and meropenem (17.6% vs 48.7%) was detected in the emergency department for in respiratory isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

A decrease in carbapenem resistance for recovered from respiratory specimens in the ICU and from urine samples from non-ICU areas was detected. In contrast, an increase in carbapenem resistance was detected for in blood isolates from non-ICU areas and respiratory isolates from the emergency department. Regarding respiratory samples, a higher resistance for meropenem was detected in 2020 than in 2019 for (2.6 vs 10.6%, = 0.05). These results underline the analysis of antimicrobial resistance in different hospital wards to focus efforts on antimicrobial resistance reduction.

摘要

目的

细菌感染是重要的死亡原因。一些报告表明,新冠疫情可能对耐药性产生了影响。本研究的目的是比较2019年和2020年墨西哥医院急诊科、非重症监护病房(ICU)和ICU区域的耐药谱。

方法

分析了来自墨西哥八个州15家医院的数据库,包括从血液、尿液、呼吸道和腹腔分泌物中收集的[具体细菌名称1]和[具体细菌名称2]的药敏结果。纳入了不同的医院区域:急诊科、非ICU病房和ICU。使用BacLink2工具转换数据库,并使用WHONET 2022平台进行分析。采用卡方检验比较各年份(2019年与2020年)每种细菌和临床标本的抗生素耐药百分比,以P<0.05为统计学显著性标准。

结果

在ICU中,从呼吸道标本分离出的[具体细菌名称1]对亚胺培南的耐药性有统计学显著下降(55.6%对39.3%),在非ICU区域的尿液样本中也有下降(52.9%对37.3%)。此外,在非ICU区域的血液分离株中,[具体细菌名称1]对碳青霉烯类抗生素的耐药性增加,亚胺培南(23.3%对54.5%)和美罗培南(27.4%对49%),以及[具体细菌名称2]对厄他培南(2.4%对10.1%)、亚胺培南(1.9%对13.2%)和美罗培南(1.6%对6.8%)。此外,在急诊科的呼吸道分离株中,[具体细菌名称1]对亚胺培南(20.0%对57.5%)和美罗培南(17.6%对48.7%)的耐药性增加。

结论

在ICU中从呼吸道标本以及非ICU区域尿液样本中分离出的[具体细菌名称1]对碳青霉烯类抗生素的耐药性有所下降。相比之下,在非ICU区域的血液分离株和急诊科的呼吸道分离株中,[具体细菌名称1]对碳青霉烯类抗生素的耐药性有所增加。关于呼吸道样本,2020年[具体细菌名称2]对美罗培南的耐药性高于2019年(2.6%对10.6%,P=0.05)。这些结果强调了对不同医院病房抗菌药物耐药性进行分析,以便集中精力降低抗菌药物耐药性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfd/11609382/ba1dec5b9699/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfd/11609382/d099efbe4680/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfd/11609382/6d8ae7a25c7d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfd/11609382/ba1dec5b9699/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfd/11609382/d099efbe4680/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfd/11609382/6d8ae7a25c7d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfd/11609382/ba1dec5b9699/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Profile of bacterial resistance in emergency wards, non-intensive care unit areas, and intensive care units in Mexican hospitals with the antimicrobial stewardship program.墨西哥医院实施抗菌药物管理计划后,急诊病房、非重症监护病房区域和重症监护病房的细菌耐药情况
IJID Reg. 2024 Oct 24;13:100474. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100474. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
The ongoing antibiotic resistance and carbapenemase encoding genotypes surveillance. The first quarter report of the INVIFAR network for 2024.正在进行的抗生素耐药性和碳青霉烯酶编码基因型监测。2024年INVIFAR网络第一季度报告。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 16;20(4):e0319441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319441. eCollection 2025.
3
Carbapenem resistance among Gram-negative isolates collected from patients in ICU and non-ICU hospital wards in Hong Kong: SMART 2017-2020.香港 ICU 和非 ICU 病房住院患者分离的革兰氏阴性菌的碳青霉烯类耐药:SMART 2017-2020。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Jun;33:260-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
4
A 2-Year Single-Centre Audit on Antibiotic Resistance of , and Strains from an Intensive Care Unit and Other Wards in a General Public Hospital in Greece.希腊一家综合公立医院重症监护病房及其他病房中、和菌株抗生素耐药性的两年单中心审计
Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 May 15;8(2):62. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8020062.
5
Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Isolates from Intensive Care Units in the United States: a Potential Role for New β-Lactam Combination Agents.美国重症监护病房的耐碳青霉烯类分离株:新型β-内酰胺联合制剂的潜在作用。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jul 26;57(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00535-19. Print 2019 Aug.
6
Predicting early appropriate therapy for patients infected by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in intensive care units in Italy.预测意大利重症监护病房感染碳青霉烯类耐药革兰氏阴性病原体患者的早期适当治疗。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Aug 26;13(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01452-y.
7
Assessing the pharmacodynamic profile of intravenous antibiotics against prevalent Gram-negative organisms collected in Colombia.评估静脉用抗生素对哥伦比亚流行的革兰氏阴性菌的药效学特征。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2011 Sep-Oct;15(5):413-9. doi: 10.1016/s1413-8670(11)70221-5.
8
Carbapenem resistant in the United Arab Emirates: a retrospective analysis from 2010 to 2021.在阿拉伯联合酋长国的碳青霉烯类耐药菌:2010 年至 2021 年的回顾性分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 7;11:1244482. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1244482. eCollection 2023.
9
Evaluation of bacterial agents isolated from endotracheal aspirate cultures of Covid-19 general intensive care patients and their antibiotic resistance profiles compared to pre-pandemic conditions.评价新冠病毒普通重症监护病房患者气管内抽吸培养物中分离出的细菌,并与大流行前的情况相比,评估其抗生素耐药谱。
Microb Pathog. 2022 Mar;164:105409. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105409. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
10
Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern comparisons among intensive care unit and general ward Gram-negative isolates from the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection Program (USA).来自美罗培南年度药敏试验信息收集项目(美国)的重症监护病房和普通病房革兰氏阴性菌分离株的抗菌药敏模式比较。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Sep;56(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.12.009. Epub 2006 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Active Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance and Carbapenemase-Encoding Genes According to Sites of Care and Age Groups in Mexico: Results from the INVIFAR Network.墨西哥基于医疗机构场所和年龄组对抗菌药物耐药性及碳青霉烯酶编码基因的主动监测:来自INVIFAR网络的结果
Pathogens. 2023 Sep 7;12(9):1144. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12091144.
2
The burden of antimicrobial resistance in the Americas in 2019: a cross-country systematic analysis.2019年美洲地区抗菌药物耐药性负担:一项跨国系统分析。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Aug 8;25:100561. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100561. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Antibiotic resistance and consumption before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Valle del Cauca, Colombia.
哥伦比亚考卡山谷在新冠疫情之前及期间的抗生素耐药性与使用情况
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2023 Apr 19;47:e10. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2023.10. eCollection 2023.
4
Antibiotic resistance associated with the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与 COVID-19 大流行相关的抗生素耐药性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Mar;29(3):302-309. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.12.006. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
5
Resistance-proof antimicrobial drug discovery to combat global antimicrobial resistance threat.研发抗耐药性抗菌药物以应对全球抗菌药物耐药性威胁。
Drug Resist Updat. 2023 Jan;66:100890. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2022.100890. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
6
Antibiotic consumption in hospitals during COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study.新冠疫情期间医院抗生素使用情况:一项对比研究
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2022 Nov 29;16(11):1679-1686. doi: 10.3855/jidc.17148.
7
Antibiotic Resistance during COVID-19: A Systematic Review.新冠疫情期间的抗生素耐药性:一项系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;19(19):11931. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911931.
8
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (November 2019-June 2021).新冠病毒患者的抗菌药物耐药性:系统评价和荟萃分析(2019 年 11 月至 2021 年 6 月)。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Mar 7;11(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01085-z.
9
Increment Antimicrobial Resistance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from the Invifar Network.新冠疫情期间抗菌药物耐药性增加:来自英维法尔网络的结果
Microb Drug Resist. 2022 Mar;28(3):338-345. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2021.0231. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
10
Pre- and post-COVID-19 evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility for healthcare-associated infections in the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital.三级医院重症监护病房医源性感染抗菌药物敏感性的 COVID-19 前后评估。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2021 Jul 23;54:e00902021. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0090-2021. eCollection 2021.