Hensher Martin
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024 Nov 16;13. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8871.
This commentary addresses Ronald Labonté's recent editorial, "can a well-being economy save us?" It considers how to assess whether well-being economy policy proposals are likely to achieve real change, or simply represent performative sloganeering. It considers Labonté's discussion of the congruence between the well-being economy and widely held, cross-cultural values. Finally it explores the relationship between "well-being economics" and the key heterodox economic disciplines it has sprung from, especially ecological and feminist economics; and explores the relationship of well-being economics with degrowth and postgrowth economics as policy goals and models, rather than disciplines. Ultimately, a well-being economy can only "save us" if it is fully guided by and constrained within the same hard ecological constraints that must also guide degrowth or post-growth policy prescriptions.
这篇评论文章回应了罗纳德·拉邦特最近的社论《福利经济能拯救我们吗?》。它探讨了如何评估福利经济政策提议是有可能带来实质性变革,还是仅仅是表面的口号。它考量了拉邦特关于福利经济与广泛存在的跨文化价值观之间一致性的讨论。最后,它探究了“福利经济学”与其所衍生的关键非正统经济学科之间的关系,特别是生态经济学和女性主义经济学;并探讨了福利经济学与去增长和后增长经济学作为政策目标和模式(而非学科)之间的关系。最终,只有当福利经济完全在与去增长或后增长政策规定相同的严格生态约束下得到引导和限制时,它才有可能“拯救我们”。