Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查的麻醉。关于麻醉作为结肠镜检查风险因素的探讨。

Anaesthesia for colonoscopy. An examination of the anaesthesia as an element of risk at colonoscopy.

作者信息

Kjaergård H, Nordkild P, Geerdsen J, Dyrberg V

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1986 Jan;30(1):60-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1986.tb02367.x.

Abstract

The importance of anaesthesia as an element of risk at colonoscopy has been examined retrospectively over a 10-year period from 1975 to 1984. The colonoscopic examinations were made by surgical gastroenterologists and anaesthesiologists working in cooperation. In 1242 cases the patients received diazepam/fentanyl anaesthesia during the colonoscopy (Group I) and in 126 cases they received general anaesthesia (Group II). The incidence of perforations of the large bowel in Group I was 0.8% (95% confidence limits: 0.4-1.5%) and in Group II 0.0% (95% confidence limits: 0.0-2.9%). Statistically the difference is not significant (P = 0.38). The groups were comparable with a view to the patients' age, weight, the duration of the colonoscopy and the number of times that polypectomy had been performed. All anaesthesia was administered by staff qualified by training and experience to administer anaesthesia, and did not cause any complications. However, four patients had vasovagal reflexes due to manipulation of the colonoscope. The dosing in the patients in Group I averaged: diazepam as premedication 9.2 mg, intravenous diazepam 12.4 mg, intravenous fentanyl 0.14 mg, and the duration of the colonoscopy was 36.5 min. The medication and the duration of the colonoscopy did not vary significantly in the patients with perforation of the large bowel. Our conclusion is that diazepam/fentanyl anaesthesia, administered by experienced staff, is harmless, and that general anaesthesia for colonoscopy did not involve an increased risk of perforation of the large bowel.

摘要

1975年至1984年的10年间,对麻醉作为结肠镜检查风险因素的重要性进行了回顾性研究。结肠镜检查由外科胃肠病学家和麻醉医生合作进行。1242例患者在结肠镜检查期间接受了地西泮/芬太尼麻醉(第一组),126例患者接受了全身麻醉(第二组)。第一组大肠穿孔的发生率为0.8%(95%置信区间:0.4 - 1.5%),第二组为0.0%(95%置信区间:0.0 - 2.9%)。统计学上差异不显著(P = 0.38)。两组在患者年龄、体重、结肠镜检查持续时间以及息肉切除术的次数方面具有可比性。所有麻醉均由经过培训和有经验的麻醉人员实施,且未引起任何并发症。然而,有4例患者因结肠镜操作出现了血管迷走反射。第一组患者的用药平均剂量为:术前使用地西泮9.2毫克,静脉注射地西泮12.4毫克,静脉注射芬太尼0.14毫克,结肠镜检查持续时间为36.5分钟。大肠穿孔患者的用药和结肠镜检查持续时间无显著差异。我们的结论是,由经验丰富的人员实施地西泮/芬太尼麻醉是无害的,并且结肠镜检查的全身麻醉并未增加大肠穿孔的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验