Jeong Yi Deun, Jo Hyesu, Cho Hanseul, Jang Wonwoo, Park Jaeyu, Lee Sooji, Lee Hayeon, Lee Kyeongmin, Oh Jiyeon, Wen Xuerong, Smith Lee, Yon Dong Keon
Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2025;186(6):579-593. doi: 10.1159/000542217. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
The safety of biologics, other than TNF-α inhibitors, during pregnancy has not been sufficiently established. To assess the risk of pregnancy-related adverse outcomes of biologics used for psoriasis, compared to TNF-α inhibitors, we utilized the WHO global pharmacovigilance database (1968-2024).
We utilized the World Health Organization's global pharmacovigilance database from 1968 to 2024. From over 140 million reports from more than 170 countries, we extracted 6,518 reports of pregnancy-related adverse outcomes associated with the biologics of interest. These biologics included TNF-α inhibitors (e.g., etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol), IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor (e.g., ustekinumab), IL-17 inhibitors (e.g., secukinumab, brodalumab, ixekizumab, bimekizumab), and IL-23 inhibitors (e.g., guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab). Each biologic was compared to TNF-α inhibitors and certolizumab pegol in two separate disproportionality analyses. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated for maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes, categorized into seven major groups. Multivariable and sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate the primary results.
The disproportionality analysis showed that, compared to TNF-α inhibitors, most biologics had a lower frequency of pregnancy-related adverse outcomes, with the exception of brodalumab. Specifically, ROR and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were as follows: ustekinumab (ROR, 0.27; 95% CI: 0.21-0.35), secukinumab (0.17; 0.13-0.22), brodalumab (0.20; 0.02-2.21), ixekizumab (0.05; 0.03-0.08), bimekizumab (0.10; 0.01-0.71), guselkumab (0.09; 0.05-0.15), tildrakizumab (0.02; 0.00-0.14), and risankizumab (0.38; 0.25-0.58). However, risankizumab was reported with a higher frequency of abortion and stillbirth (1.87; 1.32-2.63). These findings were consistent when compared to certolizumab pegol, as well as in multivariable and sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, when comparing other TNF-α inhibitors to certolizumab pegol, infliximab showed a lower frequency of pregnancy-related adverse outcomes (ROR, 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55-0.92), etanercept showed a comparable frequency (1.00; 0.77-1.31), and adalimumab showed a higher frequency (1.42; 1.11-1.81).
Biologics used for psoriasis, with the exception of brodalumab, exhibit a lower frequency of pregnancy-related adverse outcomes compared to TNF-α inhibitors and certolizumab pegol, suggesting their potential to be safe options during pregnancy. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the safety of these biologics during pregnancy, accounting for confounding factors.
除肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)抑制剂外,生物制剂在孕期的安全性尚未得到充分证实。为评估用于治疗银屑病的生物制剂与TNF-α抑制剂相比,出现与妊娠相关不良结局的风险,我们利用了世界卫生组织全球药物警戒数据库(1968 - 2024年)。
我们使用了世界卫生组织1968年至2024年的全球药物警戒数据库。从来自170多个国家的超过1.4亿份报告中,我们提取了6518份与感兴趣的生物制剂相关的妊娠相关不良结局报告。这些生物制剂包括TNF-α抑制剂(如依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗、赛妥珠单抗)、白细胞介素-12/白细胞介素-23抑制剂(如乌司奴单抗)、白细胞介素-17抑制剂(如司库奇尤单抗、布罗达单抗、依奇珠单抗、比美吉珠单抗)和白细胞介素-23抑制剂(如古塞库单抗、替拉珠单抗、瑞莎珠单抗)。在两项单独的不成比例分析中,将每种生物制剂与TNF-α抑制剂和赛妥珠单抗进行比较。计算了孕产妇、胎儿和新生儿结局的报告比值比(ROR),这些结局分为七个主要类别。进行了多变量和敏感性分析以验证主要结果。
不成比例分析表明,与TNF-α抑制剂相比,除布罗达单抗外,大多数生物制剂出现与妊娠相关不良结局的频率较低。具体而言,ROR及95%置信区间(CI)如下:乌司奴单抗(ROR,0.27;95% CI:0.21 - 0.35)、司库奇尤单抗(0.17;0.13 - 0.22)、布罗达单抗(0.20;0.02 - 2.21)、依奇珠单抗(0.05;0.03 - 0.08)、比美吉珠单抗(0.10;0.01 - 0.71)、古塞库单抗(0.09;0.05 - 0.15)、替拉珠单抗(0.02;0.00 - 0.14)和瑞莎珠单抗(0.38;0.25 - 0.58)。然而,瑞莎珠单抗报告的流产和死产频率较高(1.87;1.32 - 2.63)。与赛妥珠单抗比较时以及在多变量和敏感性分析中,这些结果是一致的。此外,将其他TNF-α抑制剂与赛妥珠单抗比较时,英夫利昔单抗出现与妊娠相关不良结局的频率较低(ROR,0.71;95% CI:0.55 - 0.92),依那西普频率相当(1.00;0.77 - 1.31),阿达木单抗频率较高(1.42;1.11 - 1.81)。
用于治疗银屑病的生物制剂,除布罗达单抗外,与TNF-α抑制剂和赛妥珠单抗相比,出现与妊娠相关不良结局的频率较低,表明它们在孕期可能是安全的选择。然而,有必要进行进一步研究以评估这些生物制剂在孕期的安全性,同时考虑混杂因素。