• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

野外的社会注意力——健康样本在自然互动过程中对眼睛的注视及自闭症特征

Social attention in the wild - fixations to the eyes and autistic traits during a naturalistic interaction in a healthy sample.

作者信息

Buehler Raimund, Ansorge Ulrich, Silani Giorgia

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, 1010, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 3;14(1):30102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79210-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-79210-8
PMID:39627271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11615244/
Abstract

Attention to social stimuli is a key component of social behavior and facilitates the development of fundamental social skills. Studies investigating social attention in neurotypical or neurodiverse populations have often relied on screen-based experiments using static images or videos, which lack the sensory richness and reciprocity present in real-life social interactions. This can possibly be attributed to the challenges one encounters when creating naturalistic experiments, such as dealing with dynamically moving areas of interest (AOIs), which require either time-intensive manual coding or restraining of participants. Here, we present findings from an experimental paradigm using unrestrained mobile eye-tracking and a face detection algorithm (MTCNN) to measure fixation rates during a semi-structured, face-to-face interview. Data from N = 62 healthy adult participants was analyzed for gaze behavior and related to participants' autistic traits. We observed a significant negative correlation between fixation rates on the eye region averaged over the entire interaction and scores on the autism spectrum quotient (AQ) (r = -0.14), indicating participants with high autistic traits fixated less frequently on the eye region. We also compared different types of interview questions (open vs. closed) to explore whether the reduction in fixation rates was more pronounced for specific time intervals during the interview. Lastly, we discuss both possibilities for extensions as well as limitations of the presented paradigm that could serve as inspiration for future research.

摘要

对社会刺激的关注是社会行为的关键组成部分,并有助于基本社交技能的发展。研究神经典型或神经多样人群中的社会注意力的实验,通常依赖于使用静态图像或视频的基于屏幕的实验,而这些实验缺乏现实生活中社交互动所具有的感官丰富性和互动性。这可能归因于创建自然主义实验时遇到的挑战,例如处理动态移动的感兴趣区域(AOI),这需要耗时的手动编码或对参与者进行限制。在这里,我们展示了一项实验范式的研究结果,该范式使用无约束的移动眼动追踪和面部检测算法(MTCNN)来测量半结构化面对面访谈期间的注视率。对来自N = 62名健康成年参与者的数据进行了注视行为分析,并将其与参与者的自闭症特征相关联。我们观察到在整个互动过程中平均在眼睛区域的注视率与自闭症谱系商数(AQ)得分之间存在显著的负相关(r = -0.14),这表明自闭症特征高的参与者在眼睛区域的注视频率较低。我们还比较了不同类型的访谈问题(开放式与封闭式),以探讨在访谈的特定时间间隔内注视率的降低是否更为明显。最后,我们讨论了所提出范式的扩展可能性和局限性,这些可能为未来的研究提供灵感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d78/11615244/1c1bfeb67a8e/41598_2024_79210_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d78/11615244/126da5e9dd03/41598_2024_79210_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d78/11615244/6067c2f66134/41598_2024_79210_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d78/11615244/6eedb812125f/41598_2024_79210_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d78/11615244/1c1bfeb67a8e/41598_2024_79210_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d78/11615244/126da5e9dd03/41598_2024_79210_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d78/11615244/6067c2f66134/41598_2024_79210_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d78/11615244/6eedb812125f/41598_2024_79210_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d78/11615244/1c1bfeb67a8e/41598_2024_79210_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Social attention in the wild - fixations to the eyes and autistic traits during a naturalistic interaction in a healthy sample.野外的社会注意力——健康样本在自然互动过程中对眼睛的注视及自闭症特征
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 3;14(1):30102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79210-8.
2
Altered interactive dynamics of gaze behavior during face-to-face interaction in autistic individuals: a dual eye-tracking study.自闭症个体在面对面互动中注视行为的交互动态改变:一项双眼追踪研究。
Mol Autism. 2025 Feb 22;16(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13229-025-00645-5.
3
Study protocol for the EYEdentify project: An examination of gaze behaviour in autistic adults using a virtual reality-based paradigm.EYEdentify项目研究方案:使用基于虚拟现实的范式对自闭症成年人的注视行为进行研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 9;20(4):e0316502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316502. eCollection 2025.
4
No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm.自闭症成人在直视与回避目光上没有偏好:一个强化偏好注视范式。
Mol Autism. 2020 Nov 18;11(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00398-3.
5
Sex-specific patterns in social visual attention among individuals with autistic traits.具有自闭症特质个体的社会视觉注意力中的性别特异性模式。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06896-z.
6
A constellation of eye-tracking measures reveals social attention differences in ASD and the broad autism phenotype.一系列的眼动追踪测量结果揭示了 ASD 和广泛自闭症表型中的社会注意力差异。
Mol Autism. 2022 May 4;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13229-022-00490-w.
7
Listener- Versus Speaker-Oriented Disfluencies in Autistic Adults: Insights From Wearable Eye-Tracking and Skin Conductance Within a Live Face-to-Face Paradigm.自闭症成人的倾听者导向与说话者导向的不流畅:来自可穿戴眼动追踪和现场面对面范式内皮肤电导率的见解。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Aug 3;66(8):2562-2580. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00002. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
8
Gaze behavior when looking at paintings may predict autistic traits.观看画作时的注视行为可能预示着自闭症特征。
Psych J. 2025 Apr;14(2):267-276. doi: 10.1002/pchj.810. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
9
Social and joint attention during shared book reading in young autistic children: a potential marker for social development.社交和共同关注在自闭症儿童共享阅读中的作用:社交发展的潜在标志物。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024 Nov;65(11):1441-1452. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13993. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
10
Social and attention-to-detail subclusters of autistic traits differentially predict looking at eyes and face identity recognition ability.自闭症特征的社交和注重细节子集群对注视眼睛和面部身份识别能力的预测存在差异。
Br J Psychol. 2017 Feb;108(1):191-219. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12188. Epub 2016 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-specific patterns in social visual attention among individuals with autistic traits.具有自闭症特质个体的社会视觉注意力中的性别特异性模式。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06896-z.

本文引用的文献

1
A constellation of eye-tracking measures reveals social attention differences in ASD and the broad autism phenotype.一系列的眼动追踪测量结果揭示了 ASD 和广泛自闭症表型中的社会注意力差异。
Mol Autism. 2022 May 4;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13229-022-00490-w.
2
How to choose the size of facial areas of interest in interactive eye tracking.如何选择交互式眼动追踪中感兴趣的面部区域大小。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 4;17(2):e0263594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263594. eCollection 2022.
3
Eye-tracking glasses in face-to-face interactions: Manual versus automated assessment of areas-of-interest.
面对面互动中的眼动追踪眼镜:手动与自动评估兴趣区域。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):2037-2048. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01544-2. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
4
Eye tracking in human interaction: Possibilities and limitations.眼动追踪在人类交互中的应用:可能性与局限性。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1592-1608. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01517-x. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
5
Temporal Profiles of Social Attention Are Different Across Development in Autistic and Neurotypical People.自闭症谱系障碍人群和神经典型人群的社会注意力发展的时间特征不同。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021 Aug;6(8):813-824. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Computer vision in autism spectrum disorder research: a systematic review of published studies from 2009 to 2019.计算机视觉在自闭症谱系障碍研究中的应用:2009 年至 2019 年发表研究的系统综述。
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 30;10(1):333. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-01015-w.
7
Effects of being watched on eye gaze and facial displays of typical and autistic individuals during conversation.交谈过程中被注视对典型个体和自闭症个体的眼神注视及面部表情的影响。
Autism. 2021 Jan;25(1):210-226. doi: 10.1177/1362361320951691. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
8
A relationship between Autism-Spectrum Quotient and face viewing behavior in 98 participants.98 名参与者的孤独症谱系商数与面部观察行为之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0230866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230866. eCollection 2020.
9
Facetime vs. Screentime: Gaze Patterns to Live and Video Social Stimuli in Adolescents with ASD.面对面交流时间与屏幕时间:自闭症青少年的注视模式与视频社交刺激。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 2;9(1):12643. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49039-7.
10
The promise of two-person neuroscience for developmental psychiatry: using interaction-based sociometrics to identify disorders of social interaction.双人神经科学在发展精神病学中的应用前景:利用基于互动的社会计量学来识别社交互动障碍。
Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;215(5):636-638. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.73.