Suppr超能文献

食管癌挽救性手术的疗效:一项来自荷兰上消化道癌症审计的全国性队列研究。

Outcomes of Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit.

作者信息

Visser Maurits R, Voeten Daan M, Gisbertz Suzanne S, Ruurda Jelle P, van Hillegersberg Richard, van Berge Henegouwen Mark I

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;32(4):2687-2697. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16490-4. Epub 2024 Dec 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Salvage esophagectomy is more complex and associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality than standard resection. This study aimed to investigate short-term outcomes and the influence of hospital volume on these outcomes of salvage surgery for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The study enrolled all patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) between 2012 and 2022. The patients were classified as salvage or non-salvage by registering surgeons. Salvage surgery is defined in the DUCA as surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative mortality (30-day/in-hospital) and morbidity were compared between the salvage and non-salvage patients using multilevel logistic regression analyses. Hospital variation in the use of salvage esophagectomy was investigated using funnel plots. The influence of hospital volume (≤ 40 to > 40 cases) and salvage volume (< 6 to ≥ 6 cases) on outcomes for salvage patients were investigated. Using backward elimination, relevant baseline characteristics influencing salvage outcomes were identified.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2022, 7749 patients underwent esophagectomy, 251 (3%) of whom underwent salvage resection, varying from 0 to 8% between centers. Severe complications (43% vs 28%; odds ratio [OR], 1.81; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.34) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality (11% vs 3%; OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.38-5.61) were higher after salvage surgery than after non-salvage surgery. Salvage patients treated in high-volume centers had a lower risk of 30-day/in-hospital mortality than those treated in low-volume centers (9% vs 19%; OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.99), with no relation between salvage volume and outcome. Male sex, older age (> 75 years), and squamous cell carcinoma were associated with worse short-term outcomes of salvage surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage surgery is associated with worse short-term outcomes than non-salvage esophagectomy. Outcomes after salvage surgery were favorable in high-volume esophagectomy centers.

摘要

背景

挽救性食管切除术比标准切除术更复杂,术后发病率和死亡率更高。本研究旨在调查食管癌挽救性手术的短期结局以及医院手术量对这些结局的影响。

方法

该研究纳入了2012年至2022年在荷兰上消化道癌症审计(DUCA)中登记的所有接受食管癌食管切除术的患者。登记的外科医生将患者分为挽救性或非挽救性。在DUCA中,挽救性手术定义为确定性放化疗后的手术。使用多水平逻辑回归分析比较挽救性和非挽救性患者的术后死亡率(30天/住院期间)和发病率。使用漏斗图研究挽救性食管切除术使用情况的医院差异。研究医院手术量(≤40例与>40例)和挽救性手术量(<6例与≥6例)对挽救性患者结局的影响。通过向后排除法,确定影响挽救性结局的相关基线特征。

结果

2012年至2022年期间,7749例患者接受了食管切除术,其中251例(3%)接受了挽救性切除,各中心之间的比例从0%到8%不等。挽救性手术后的严重并发症(43%对28%;比值比[OR],1.81;95%置信区间[CI],1.40 - 2.34)和30天/住院期间死亡率(11%对3%;OR,3.65;95%CI,2.38 - 5.61)高于非挽救性手术后。在高手术量中心接受治疗的挽救性患者30天/住院期间死亡风险低于低手术量中心的患者(9%对19%;OR,0.42;95%CI,0.18 - 0.99),挽救性手术量与结局无关。男性、老年(>75岁)和鳞状细胞癌与挽救性手术较差的短期结局相关。

结论

与非挽救性食管切除术相比,挽救性手术的短期结局更差。在高手术量食管切除中心,挽救性手术后的结局较好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验