• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Waiting to Operate: The Risk of Salvage Esophagectomy.等待手术:挽救性食管切除术的风险。
Ann Surg. 2023 May 1;277(5):781-788. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005798. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
2
Salvage esophagectomy after failed definitive chemoradiation for esophageal adenocarcinoma.根治性放化疗失败后的食管腺癌挽救性切除术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Oct;94(4):1126-32; discussion 1132-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.106. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
3
It's not always too late: a case for minimally invasive salvage esophagectomy.并非总是为时过晚:微创挽救性食管切除术 1 例报告。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4700-4711. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07937-2. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
4
The Impact of Adjuvant Postoperative Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy on Survival After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Carcinoma.辅助术后放化疗对食管癌切除术患者生存的影响。
Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1146-1151. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001825.
5
Waiting Time from Diagnosis to Treatment has no Impact on Survival in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.食管癌患者从诊断到治疗的等待时间对生存无影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(8):2679-89. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5191-6. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
6
Prognostic Factors of Salvage Esophagectomy for Residual or Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy.根治性放化疗后残留或复发食管鳞状细胞癌挽救性食管切除术的预后因素
World J Surg. 2018 Sep;42(9):2887-2893. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4536-7.
7
Postoperative Pneumonia is Associated with Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Salvage Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.术后肺炎与食管癌根治性放化疗后挽救性食管切除术的长期肿瘤学结局相关。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Nov;22(11):1881-1889. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3857-z. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
8
Survival risk prediction model for patients with pT NM esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after R0 esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for therapeutic purposes.pT NM期食管鳞状细胞癌患者行R0食管切除术及两野淋巴结清扫术治疗后的生存风险预测模型
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 May 1;16(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01503-0.
9
Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer: Results of the MIRO Randomized Clinical Trial.杂交微创食管癌根治术治疗食管癌的 5 年生存结果:MIRO 随机临床试验结果。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Apr 1;156(4):323-332. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.7081.
10
Prognosis after neoadjuvant chemoradiation or chemotherapy for locally advanced gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma.局部晚期胃食管结合部腺癌新辅助放化疗或化疗后的预后。
Br J Surg. 2021 Nov 11;108(11):1332-1340. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab228.

引用本文的文献

1
Case report: Watch-and-wait strategy in resectable esophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy: a case series.病例报告:新辅助化疗免疫治疗后可切除食管癌的观察等待策略:病例系列
Front Immunol. 2025 Jan 6;15:1502206. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1502206. eCollection 2024.
2
Outcomes of Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit.食管癌挽救性手术的疗效:一项来自荷兰上消化道癌症审计的全国性队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;32(4):2687-2697. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16490-4. Epub 2024 Dec 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Salvage Esophagectomy Definition Influences Comparative Outcomes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancers.挽救性食管切除术的定义影响食管鳞癌的对比结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Dec;114(6):2032-2040. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.10.046. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
Updated protocol of the SANO trial: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial comparing surgery with active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer.SANO 试验更新方案:新辅助放化疗后比较手术与主动监测治疗食管癌的阶梯式楔形簇随机试验
Trials. 2021 May 17;22(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05274-w.
3
Survival After Trimodality Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma: Does Only a Complete Pathologic Response Matter?局部晚期胃食管腺癌患者接受三联疗法后的生存:是否只有完全病理缓解才有意义?
Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):1017-1022. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004638. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
4
Morbidity following salvage esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: the MD Anderson experience.挽救性食管切除术治疗鳞状细胞癌的并发症:MD 安德森的经验。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Mar 16;33(3). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz067.
5
Prognostic Factors of Salvage Esophagectomy for Residual or Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy.根治性放化疗后残留或复发食管鳞状细胞癌挽救性食管切除术的预后因素
World J Surg. 2018 Sep;42(9):2887-2893. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4536-7.
6
Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: How to Improve Outcomes?食管癌挽救性手术:如何改善预后?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 May;25(5):1277-1286. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6365-1. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
7
Radiation Pneumonitis.放射性肺炎
Clin Chest Med. 2017 Jun;38(2):201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.12.004. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
8
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for Evaluating Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.胸外科医师协会评估食管癌食管切除术的综合评分
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 May;103(5):1661-1667. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.027. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
9
High dose radiation with chemotherapy followed by salvage esophagectomy among patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.大剂量放疗联合化疗后挽救性食管切除术治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌。
Thorac Cancer. 2017 May;8(3):219-228. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12427. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
10
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial.新辅助放化疗联合手术与单纯手术治疗食管或食管胃交界癌(CROSS):一项随机对照临床试验的长期结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1090-1098. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

等待手术:挽救性食管切除术的风险。

Waiting to Operate: The Risk of Salvage Esophagectomy.

机构信息

Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2023 May 1;277(5):781-788. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005798. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005798
PMID:36727949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10354214/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess postoperative morbidity, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with salvage esophagectomy (SE).

BACKGROUND DATA

A shift toward a "surgery as needed" approach for esophageal cancer has emerged, potentially resulting in delayed esophagectomy.

METHODS

We identified patients with clinical stage I-III esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who underwent chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy from 2001 to 2019. SE was defined as esophagectomy performed >90 days after chemoradiation ("for time") and esophagectomy performed for recurrence after curative-intent chemoradiation ("for recurrence"). The odds of postoperative serious complications were assessed by multivariable logistic regression. The relationship between SE and OS and DFS were quantified using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of 1137 patients identified, 173 (15%) underwent SE. Of those, 61 (35%) underwent SE for recurrence, and 112 (65%) underwent SE for time. The odds of experiencing any serious complication [odds ratio, 2.10 (95% CI, 1.37-3.20); P =0.001] or serious pulmonary complication [odds ratio, 2.11 (95% CI, 1.31-3.42); P =0.002] were 2-fold higher for SE patients; SE patients had a 1.5-fold higher hazard of death [hazard ratio, 1.56 (95% CI, 1.25-1.94); P <0.0001] and postoperative recurrence [hazard ratio, 1.43 (95% CI, 1.16-1.77); P =0.001]. Five-year OS for nonsalvage esophagectomy was 45% [(95% CI, 41.6%-48.6%) versus 26.5% (95% CI, 20.2%-34.8%) for SE (log-rank P <0.001)]. Five-year OS for SE for time was 27.1% [(95% CI, 19.5%-37.5%) versus 25.2% (95% CI, 15.3%-41.5%) for SE for recurrence ( P =0.611)].

CONCLUSIONS

SE is associated with a higher risk of serious postoperative complications and shorter DFS and OS.

摘要

目的

评估接受挽救性食管切除术(SE)治疗的患者的术后发病率、无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)。

背景资料

对于食管癌,一种“按需手术”的方法已经出现,这可能导致食管切除术的延迟。

方法

我们从 2001 年至 2019 年期间,确定了接受放化疗后接受食管切除术的临床 I-III 期食管腺癌或鳞状细胞癌患者。SE 定义为放化疗后>90 天进行的食管切除术(“时间”)和为根治性放化疗后复发而进行的食管切除术(“复发”)。使用多变量逻辑回归评估术后严重并发症的发生几率。使用 Cox 回归模型量化 SE 与 OS 和 DFS 的关系。

结果

在确定的 1137 名患者中,有 173 名(15%)接受了 SE。其中,61 名(35%)因复发而接受 SE,112 名(65%)因时间而接受 SE。经历任何严重并发症的几率[比值比,2.10(95%CI,1.37-3.20);P=0.001]或严重肺部并发症的几率[比值比,2.11(95%CI,1.31-3.42);P=0.002]均高出 2 倍;SE 患者的死亡风险[风险比,1.56(95%CI,1.25-1.94);P<0.0001]和术后复发[风险比,1.43(95%CI,1.16-1.77);P=0.001]的风险高出 1.5 倍。非挽救性食管切除术的 5 年 OS 为 45%[(95%CI,41.6%-48.6%)与 SE 的 26.5%(95%CI,20.2%-34.8%)(对数秩 P<0.001)]。SE 中时间的 5 年 OS 为 27.1%[(95%CI,19.5%-37.5%)与 SE 中复发的 25.2%(95%CI,15.3%-41.5%)(P=0.611)]。

结论

SE 与术后严重并发症以及较短的 DFS 和 OS 风险增加相关。