Yang Yingting, Lei Haihua, Liu Yang, Xia Bin
Third Clinical Division, Center of Stomatology & National Cal Engineering Laboratory for Digital and MaterialMinistry of Health & NMPA Key Laboratory for Denta, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology &National, Beijing, PR China.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, &National Center of Stomatology & National Cal Engineering Laboratory for Digital and MaterialMinistry of Health & NMPA Key Laboratory for Denta, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, PR China.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 3;24(1):1461. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05242-1.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Traditional restorative composites require time-consuming incremental layering techniques which poses challenges in pediatric dentistry. SonicFill bulk resin allows for thicker layers to be placed efficiently, reducing treatment time and enhancing filling quality. This prospective, parallel, randomized, controlled clinical study aimed to compare the operative time and outcomes between SonicFill bulk resin and conventional restorative composite for deep proximal restorations in primary molars.
A total of 129 primary molars in patients with proximal deep caries were randomly assigned to two groups. The experimental group (n = 66) received SonicFill bulk resin treatment, while the control group (n = 63) underwent restoration using traditional composite. The operative time was documented, and all teeth were evaluated at 6, 12, 18, and 24 -months post-treatment based on the modified criteria from the United States Public Health Service and radiographic examination score.
The operative time for SonicFill resin (137.5 ± 5.2 s) revealed a significant reduction compared to traditional composite (193.5 ± 14.4 s), (t = 29.64, P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of colour match, marginal adaptation and so on. Success rates were 95.2% for the control group and 89.4% for the experimental group (χ = 1.44, P>0.05).
The SonicFill resin technique has proven to be a viable and time-efficient option for the restoration of primary molars with deep proximal caries.
This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200055570) on the date of 13/01/2022.
背景/目的:传统的修复性复合材料需要耗时的分层技术,这给儿童牙科带来了挑战。SonicFill大容量树脂能够高效地放置更厚的层,减少治疗时间并提高填充质量。这项前瞻性、平行、随机、对照临床研究旨在比较SonicFill大容量树脂与传统修复性复合材料用于乳磨牙深邻面修复的手术时间和效果。
将129例患有邻面深龋的患者的乳磨牙随机分为两组。实验组(n = 66)接受SonicFill大容量树脂治疗,而对照组(n = 63)使用传统复合材料进行修复。记录手术时间,并根据美国公共卫生服务部的修改标准和影像学检查评分在治疗后6、12、18和24个月对所有牙齿进行评估。
SonicFill树脂的手术时间(137.5 ± 5.2秒)与传统复合材料(193.5 ± 14.4秒)相比显著缩短,(t = 29.64,P < 0.05)。两组在颜色匹配、边缘适应性等方面未观察到显著差异。对照组成功率为95.2%,实验组为89.4%(χ = 1.44,P > 0.05)。
SonicFill树脂技术已被证明是修复患有深邻面龋的乳磨牙的一种可行且省时的选择。
本研究于2022年1月13日在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2200055570)注册。