Cai Yuanting, Xv Linbin, Zhu Zili, He Shiyi, Sun Tianyu, Cao Chao
The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Dec 3;24(1):599. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03422-x.
As bronchiectasis progresses, increasing degrees of airflow limitation can occur.
This study aimed to investigate whether concomitant airflow limitation was associated with poor prognosis in patients with bronchiectasis and to identify the characteristics of patients with airflow limitation in bronchiectasis.
A prospective longitudinal study was conducted to determine the characteristics and prognosis of bronchiectasis patients with airflow limitation.
We conducted a prospective longitudinal study. Patients who failed to complete the follow-up were withdrawn from the trial. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) was used for diagnosing bronchiectasis, whereas postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second of the predicted value (post-FEV1%) was employed for grading airflow limitation. The main variables included questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, pulmonary function tests, laboratory tests, and CT findings. The primary outcome was frequent exacerbations. Differences among the groups were evaluated via two-tailed Student's t test or ANOVA for continuous variables if the data were normally distributed. In the case of a nonnormal distribution, the Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors and calculate the odds ratio (OR) for frequent exacerbations.
A total of 189 subjects with bronchiectasis were enrolled in the study, including 97 patients with airflow limitation and 92 patients without airway obstruction. Patients with airflow limitation had greater numbers of exacerbations (1.46 ± 0.83 vs. 1.76 ± 1.10 times, P = 0.013) at 12 months after enrolment and greater numbers of hospitalizations (1.10 ± 0.30 vs. 1.36 ± 0.67 times, P = 0.0016) at 24 months after enrolment. In addition, acute exacerbations lasted longer (8.69 ± 3.78 vs. 13.11 ± 14.03 days, P = 0.0171), and the total number of hospitalizations was greater (1.34 ± 0.77 vs. 1.80 ± 1.67 times, P = 0.0421) for patients with a mean follow-up duration of 32 months (Table 3). Bronchiectasis patients with airflow limitation exhibit more severe manifestations of bronchiectasis both clinically and functionally. Furthermore, the cohort of bronchiectasis patients with airflow limitation had a significantly greater infection rate than did the BE group (P = 0.0244), with a notable disparity observed in the incidence of P. aeruginosa infection (P < 0.0001).
The results of our study suggest that patients with airflow limitation are more likely to experience acute exacerbations and hospitalizations than are those without airflow limitation. Patients with bronchiectasis concomitant with airflow limitation should be identified as early as possible, and individualized treatment methods should be formulated.
随着支气管扩张的进展,气流受限程度可能会不断加重。
本研究旨在调查支气管扩张患者合并气流受限是否与预后不良相关,并确定支气管扩张气流受限患者的特征。
进行一项前瞻性纵向研究以确定支气管扩张气流受限患者的特征和预后。
我们开展了一项前瞻性纵向研究。未完成随访的患者退出试验。高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)用于诊断支气管扩张,而支气管扩张剂后一秒用力呼气容积占预计值百分比(支气管扩张剂后FEV1%)用于评估气流受限程度。主要变量包括问卷调查、人体测量、肺功能测试、实验室检查和CT检查结果。主要结局是频繁急性加重。对于连续变量,如果数据呈正态分布,则通过双尾学生t检验或方差分析评估组间差异。在数据非正态分布的情况下,使用曼-惠特尼U检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验。分类变量使用卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验。二元逻辑回归分析用于确定因素并计算频繁急性加重的比值比(OR)。
本研究共纳入189例支气管扩张患者,其中97例存在气流受限,92例无气道阻塞。气流受限患者在入组12个月时急性加重次数更多(1.46±0.83次对1.76±1.10次,P = 0.013),在入组24个月时住院次数更多(1.10±0.30次对1.36±0.67次,P = 0.0016)。此外,平均随访32个月时,气流受限患者的急性加重持续时间更长(8.69±3.78天对13.11±14.03天,P = 0.0171),住院总次数更多(1.34±0.77次对1.80±1.67次,P = 0.0421)(表3)。气流受限的支气管扩张患者在临床和功能上均表现出更严重的支气管扩张表现。此外,气流受限的支气管扩张患者队列的感染率明显高于支气管扩张组(P = 0.0244),铜绿假单胞菌感染发生率存在显著差异(P < 0.0001)。
我们的研究结果表明,与无气流受限的患者相比,气流受限的患者更易发生急性加重和住院。应尽早识别合并气流受限的支气管扩张患者,并制定个体化治疗方案。