• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊柱外科医生在决定治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症时会考虑哪些影像学和脊柱骨盆参数?

What Radiographic and Spinopelvic Parameters do Spine Surgeons Consider in Decision-Making for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis?

作者信息

Cabrera Juan P, Virk Michael S, Cho Samuel K, Muthu Sathish, Ambrosio Luca, Yoon S Tim, Buser Zorica, Wang Jeffrey C, Diwan Ashish D, Hsieh Patrick C

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Clínico Regional de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2024 Dec 4:21925682241306105. doi: 10.1177/21925682241306105.

DOI:10.1177/21925682241306105
PMID:39630131
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11618860/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is remarkably varied due to heterogeneity of clinical-radiological presentations. This study aimed to assess which spinopelvic radiological parameters were considered for decision-making.

METHODS

Survey distributed to International AO Spine members to analyze surgeons' considerations for treatment. Data collected includes demographics, training background, years of experience, and treatment decisions based on various radiographical findings, including segmental and global spinopelvic parameters.

RESULTS

From 479 responses, the most frequently radiological parameter considered was slippage on dynamic X-rays (79.1%), followed by disc height (78.9%), global sagittal balance SVA (71.4%), and PI-LL mismatch (69.7%), while the least important was absolute spondylolisthesis on static lateral radiograph (22.8%). Fellowship-trained surgeons were likelier to use SVA (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.02-2.99, = 0.049), and disc height (2.13, 1.14-3.98, < 0.05). There was no difference between orthopedics and neurosurgery in applying SVA and PI-LL mismatch. Surgeons from Asia Pacific emphasizes segmental lordosis (2.39, 1.11-5.15, = 0.026) as from Latin America (2.55, 1.09-5.95, = 0.030) and Middle East (4.33, 1.66-11.28, = 0.003). However, surgeons from Latin America and Middle East also significant consider disc height (2.95, 1.07-8.15, = 0.037) and (3.03, 1.04-8.83, = 0.043), respectively. Additionally, the surgeons' age was associated with using angular motion on flexion-extension radiographs, and volume of treated cases yearly with consideration for disc height.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis was influenced by slippage on dynamic radiographs, disc height, global alignment, and PI-LL mismatch. Surgeons' age and Region, fellowship-trained, and volume of treated cases were significantly associated to apply these radiological parameters.

摘要

研究设计

横断面调查。

目的

由于临床-放射学表现的异质性,退行性腰椎滑脱的手术治疗差异显著。本研究旨在评估在决策时会考虑哪些脊柱骨盆放射学参数。

方法

向国际AO脊柱协会成员发放调查问卷,以分析外科医生的治疗考量因素。收集的数据包括人口统计学信息、培训背景、经验年限以及基于各种影像学检查结果(包括节段性和整体脊柱骨盆参数)做出的治疗决策。

结果

在479份回复中,最常被考虑的放射学参数是动态X线片上的滑脱(79.1%),其次是椎间盘高度(78.9%)、整体矢状面平衡SVA(71.4%)和PI-LL失配(69.7%),而最不重要的是静态侧位X线片上的绝对腰椎滑脱(22.8%)。接受过专科培训的外科医生更倾向于使用SVA(OR = 1.73,95% CI = 1.02 - 2.99,P = 0.049)和椎间盘高度(2.13,1.14 - 3.98,P < 0.05)。在应用SVA和PI-LL失配方面,骨科医生和神经外科医生之间没有差异。亚太地区的外科医生更强调节段性前凸(2.39,1.11 - 5.15,P = 0.026),拉丁美洲(2.55,1.09 - 5.95,P = 0.030)和中东地区(4.33,1.66 - 11.28,P = 0.003)的医生也是如此。然而,拉丁美洲和中东地区的外科医生也分别显著考虑椎间盘高度(2.95,1.07 - 8.15,P = 0.037)和(3.03,1.04 - 8.83,P = 0.043)。此外,外科医生的年龄与屈伸位X线片上的角运动使用情况相关,每年治疗病例数与对椎间盘高度的考虑相关。

结论

退行性腰椎滑脱的治疗受动态X线片上的滑脱、椎间盘高度、整体对线情况以及PI-LL失配的影响。外科医生的年龄、地区、是否接受过专科培训以及每年治疗病例数与这些放射学参数的应用显著相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a211/12127686/f24ba42c93f0/10.1177_21925682241306105-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a211/12127686/f24ba42c93f0/10.1177_21925682241306105-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a211/12127686/f24ba42c93f0/10.1177_21925682241306105-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
What Radiographic and Spinopelvic Parameters do Spine Surgeons Consider in Decision-Making for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis?脊柱外科医生在决定治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症时会考虑哪些影像学和脊柱骨盆参数?
Global Spine J. 2024 Dec 4:21925682241306105. doi: 10.1177/21925682241306105.
2
Radiographic Restoration of Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.退行性腰椎滑脱症后路腰椎椎间融合术后矢状位脊柱骨盆对线的影像学恢复
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Mar;29(2):E87-92. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000104.
3
Comparison of Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment between Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Degenerative Spinal Stenosis.腰椎退行性椎体滑脱症与退行性腰椎管狭窄症矢状位脊柱-骨盆矢状面排列的比较。
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014 Jun;55(6):331-6. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2014.55.6.331. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
4
[Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].腰椎滑脱症腰骶融合术后相邻节段退变:一项回顾性影像学及临床分析
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Apr;77(2):124-30.
5
Influence of postoperative sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters on the outcome of patients surgically treated for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.术后矢状面平衡和脊柱骨盆参数对退行性腰椎滑脱症手术治疗患者疗效的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Apr;26(4):448-453. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE1680. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
6
Association of Sagittal Spinopelvic Realignment with Correction in Lower Lumbar Lordosis after Surgical Treatment in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis.矢状位脊柱骨盆参数矫正与退行性腰椎侧凸后路矫形术后下腰椎前凸改善的相关性。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):2034-2042. doi: 10.1111/os.13138. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
7
Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.术式是否有影响?单节段腰椎融合术中脊柱骨盆参数的比较影像学分析。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):1999-2008. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
8
Lumbar degenerative disease after oblique lateral interbody fusion: sagittal spinopelvic alignment and its impact on low back pain.腰椎退行性疾病后路斜外侧椎间融合术后:矢状位脊柱骨盆参数及其对下腰痛的影响。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 14;15(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01837-w.
9
Impact of preoperative age-adjusted sagittal imbalance on radiographic and clinical outcomes following 1-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis.术前年龄调整矢状失平衡对退行性腰椎滑脱症单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后影像学和临床结果的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Aug 2;41(4):489-497. doi: 10.3171/2024.4.SPINE23737. Print 2024 Oct 1.
10
Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: factors associated with the decision to fuse.腰椎退行性滑脱:与融合决策相关的因素。
Spine J. 2021 May;21(5):821-828. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Nov 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical effectiveness of reduction and fusion versus in situ fusion in the management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.退变性腰椎滑脱症治疗中复位融合与原位融合的临床疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2024 May;33(5):1748-1761. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08041-4. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
2
Clinical, Radiographic and Fusion Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) stand-alone and OLIF with posterior pedicle screw fixation in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.单独斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)与后路经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的临床、影像学和融合比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Oct 30;24(1):852. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06985-8.
3
Functional outcomes correlate with sagittal spinal balance in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery.
退变性腰椎滑脱症手术中矢状位脊柱平衡与功能结果相关。
Spine J. 2023 Oct;23(10):1512-1521. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
4
Current treatment and decision-making factors leading to fusion vs decompression for one-level degenerative spondylolisthesis: survey results from members of the Lumbar Spine Research Society and Society of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.一期退变性腰椎滑脱融合与减压治疗选择及决策因素:腰椎研究学会和微创脊柱外科学会成员的调查结果。
Spine J. 2022 Nov;22(11):1778-1787. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.095. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
5
Decompression alone or decompression and fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.退行性腰椎滑脱症单纯减压或减压融合术
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Jul 16;51:101559. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101559. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Is Indirect Decompression and Fusion More Effective than Direct Decompression and Fusion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Instability? A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis.对于治疗伴有不稳的退变性腰椎管狭窄症,间接减压融合术是否比直接减压融合术更有效?一项系统评价和Meta分析。
Global Spine J. 2023 Mar;13(2):499-511. doi: 10.1177/21925682221098362. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
7
Decompression with or without Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.退变性腰椎滑脱症的减压融合与非融合。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 5;385(6):526-538. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100990.
8
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy Bilateral Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for One-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.腰椎内镜下单侧椎板切开双侧减压与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症伴退行性椎体滑脱的临床疗效比较
Front Surg. 2021 Feb 26;7:596327. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.596327. eCollection 2020.
9
How do spinopelvic parameters influence patient-reported outcome measurements after lumbar decompression?脊柱骨盆参数如何影响腰椎减压术后患者报告的结局测量?
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1610-1617. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.101. Epub 2020 May 20.
10
Allogenic Stem Cells in Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review.同种异体干细胞在脊柱融合中的应用:一项系统评价。
Global Spine J. 2019 May;9(1 Suppl):22S-38S. doi: 10.1177/2192568219833336. Epub 2019 May 8.