• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退变性腰椎滑脱症的减压融合与非融合。

Decompression with or without Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

机构信息

From Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Department, Haukeland University Hospital (I.M.A., E.H., F.R., K.I.), and the Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen (E.H., F.R., K.I.), Bergen, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund Hospital, Orthopedic Department, Ålesund (E.H.), the Oslo Center for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services (M.W.F.), the Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health, Division of Clinical Neuroscience (K.S.), and the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (J.I.B.), Oslo University Hospital, the Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University (K.S.), the Medical Faculty (J.I.B.), the Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (T.B.), and the Institute of Clinical Medicine (H. Banitalebi), University of Oslo, Akershus University Hospital, Orthopedic Department (O.G.), Radiology, Unilabs Radiology (K.R.H.A.), and the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (T.B.) and the Division of Orthopedic Surgery (C.H.), Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø-the Arctic University of Norway, and the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø (T.S.), the Orthopedic Department (E.F.) and the Department of Neurosurgery (C.W.), Stavanger University Hospital, and the Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger (C.W.), Stavanger, and the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog (H. Banitalebi) - all in Norway; and the Spine Surgery Team, Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, and the Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden (H. Brisby).

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 5;385(6):526-538. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100990.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2100990
PMID:34347953
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis, it is uncertain whether decompression surgery alone is noninferior to decompression with instrumented fusion.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, multicenter, noninferiority trial involving patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis that had not responded to conservative management and who had single-level spondylolisthesis of 3 mm or more. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo decompression surgery (decompression-alone group) or decompression surgery with instrumented fusion (fusion group). The primary outcome was a reduction of at least 30% in the score on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI; range, 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more impairment) during the 2 years after surgery, with a noninferiority margin of -15 percentage points. Secondary outcomes included the mean change in the ODI score as well as scores on the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire, leg and back pain, the duration of surgery and length of hospital stay, and reoperation within 2 years.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was approximately 66 years. Approximately 75% of the patients had leg pain for more than a year, and more than 80% had back pain for more than a year. The mean change from baseline to 2 years in the ODI score was -20.6 in the decompression-alone group and -21.3 in the fusion group (mean difference, 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.8 to 4.3). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, 95 of 133 patients (71.4%) in the decompression-alone group and 94 of 129 patients (72.9%) in the fusion group had a reduction of at least 30% in the ODI score (difference, -1.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -12.2 to 9.4), showing the noninferiority of decompression alone. In the per-protocol analysis, 80 of 106 patients (75.5%) and 83 of 110 patients (75.5%), respectively, had a reduction of at least 30% in the ODI score (difference, 0.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -11.4 to 11.4), showing noninferiority. The results for the secondary outcomes were generally in the same direction as those for the primary outcome. Successful fusion was achieved with certainty in 86 of 100 patients (86.0%) who had imaging available at 2 years. Reoperation was performed in 15 of 120 patients (12.5%) in the decompression-alone group and in 11 of 121 patients (9.1%) in the fusion group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial involving patients who underwent surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, most of whom had symptoms for more than a year, decompression alone was noninferior to decompression with instrumented fusion over a period of 2 years. Reoperation occurred somewhat more often in the decompression-alone group than in the fusion group. (NORDSTEN-DS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02051374.).

摘要

背景

对于患有腰椎管狭窄症和退行性腰椎滑脱的患者,单独减压是否不如减压联合器械融合术尚不确定。

方法

我们进行了一项开放标签、多中心、非劣效性试验,纳入了对保守治疗无反应且单节段滑脱程度为 3 毫米或以上的有症状腰椎狭窄症患者。患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配接受减压手术(减压组)或减压联合器械融合术(融合组)。主要结局是术后 2 年内 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI;范围为 0 到 100,分数越高表示功能障碍越严重)至少降低 30%,非劣效性边界为-15 个百分点。次要结局包括 ODI 评分的平均变化以及苏黎世间歇性跛行问卷、腿痛和腰痛、手术时间和住院时间、以及 2 年内再次手术的情况。

结果

患者的平均年龄约为 66 岁。约 75%的患者腿痛持续超过 1 年,超过 80%的患者腰痛持续超过 1 年。减压组和融合组在基线至 2 年时 ODI 评分的平均变化分别为-20.6 和-21.3(平均差值,0.7;95%置信区间 [CI],-2.8 至 4.3)。在改良意向治疗分析中,减压组 133 例患者中有 95 例(71.4%)和融合组 129 例患者中有 94 例(72.9%)ODI 评分至少降低了 30%(差值,-1.4 个百分点;95%CI,-12.2 至 9.4),表明单独减压具有非劣效性。在方案设定的分析中,减压组 106 例患者中有 80 例(75.5%)和融合组 110 例患者中有 83 例(75.5%)ODI 评分至少降低了 30%(差值,0.0 个百分点;95%CI,-11.4 至 11.4),表明具有非劣效性。次要结局的结果总体上与主要结局一致。在 2 年时可获得影像学结果的 100 例患者中,有 86 例(86.0%)确定融合成功。减压组有 15 例(12.5%)和融合组有 11 例(9.1%)患者进行了再次手术。

结论

在这项涉及退行性腰椎滑脱症手术患者的试验中,大多数患者的症状持续超过 1 年,在 2 年内,单纯减压与减压联合器械融合术的效果相当。减压组的再次手术发生率略高于融合组。(NORDSTEN-DS ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT02051374)。

相似文献

1
Decompression with or without Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.退变性腰椎滑脱症的减压融合与非融合。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 5;385(6):526-538. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100990.
2
Decompression alone or with fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Nordsten-DS): five year follow-up of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.单纯减压或减压融合治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症(Nordsten-DS):一项随机、多中心、非劣效性试验的 5 年随访。
BMJ. 2024 Aug 7;386:e079771. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-079771.
3
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.随机对照试验:融合手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1413-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513721.
4
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.后路腰椎滑脱症的椎板切除术联合融合术与单纯椎板切除术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1424-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508788.
5
The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.单纯减压与附加融合术治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症合并腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较:一项来自挪威脊柱外科登记处的实用比较非劣效性观察性研究
Eur Spine J. 2017 Feb;26(2):404-413. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4683-1. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
6
Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumental fusion the NORDSTEN degenerative spondylolisthesis trial (NORDSTEN-DS); study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.单纯减压与减压联合器械融合治疗诺德斯坦退行性腰椎滑脱症试验(NORDSTEN-DS);一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jan 5;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2384-0.
7
The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.单纯减压治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症合并腰椎管狭窄症的疗效。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Feb;26(2):414-419. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4637-7. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
8
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与单纯减压治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症的对比研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18722.
9
Comparative Effectiveness of Microdecompression Alone vs Decompression Plus Instrumented Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.单纯小切口显微减压术与减压加内固定融合术治疗腰椎退行性滑脱的比较效果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2015015. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15015.
10
Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.来自前瞻性质量结果数据库的426例1级腰椎滑脱患者单纯椎板切除术与融合术的对比研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Nov 30;30(2):234-241. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.SPINE17913. Print 2019 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Efficacy of Various Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Techniques in Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review.探索各种微创手术(MIS)技术在退行性腰椎滑脱症脊柱融合术中的疗效:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 25;17(7):e88723. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88723. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Decompression with interbody fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar diseases: A meta-analysis.椎间融合减压术与单纯减压术治疗退变性腰椎疾病的Meta分析
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 26;20(8):e0330926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330926. eCollection 2025.
3
Noninstrumented Posterolateral Lumbar Fusions Continue to Fade Relative to Instrumented Posterolateral Approaches for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Over the Past Decade.
在过去十年中,与腰椎退行性滑脱的器械辅助后外侧入路相比,非器械辅助后外侧腰椎融合术的应用持续减少。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Aug 19;9(8). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00192. eCollection 2025 Aug 1.
4
Long-term risk of adjacent segment disease and reoperation following instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: A hospital-based cohort study with up to 30 years of follow-up.腰椎后外侧融合内固定术后相邻节段疾病及再次手术的长期风险:一项随访长达30年的基于医院的队列研究。
Brain Spine. 2025 Jul 17;5:104332. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104332. eCollection 2025.
5
All Cause 5-Year Revision Rates of Patients with Surgically Treated Lumbar Stenosis with and Without Instrumented Arthrodesis.接受手术治疗的腰椎管狭窄症患者(有无器械辅助关节融合术)的全因5年翻修率。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jul 14:21925682251360656. doi: 10.1177/21925682251360656.
6
Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Stenosis.双孔道内镜减压治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症伴狭窄
Neurospine. 2025 Jun;22(2):556-565. doi: 10.14245/ns.2449354.677. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
7
Development and validation of a novel classification for characterizing degenerative spondylolisthesis of lumbar spine.一种用于表征腰椎退行性椎体滑脱的新型分类方法的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21413. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06298-x.
8
Perspectives on treatment decision-making across racial groups in adults with degenerative lumbar disease - A pilot study.成人退行性腰椎疾病不同种族群体治疗决策的观点——一项试点研究。
Interv Pain Med. 2025 Jun 3;4(2):100596. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100596. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Streamlining the Journey of Research Into Clinical Practice: Making Your Patients and Practice Flourish: When to Fuse? An Evidence Based Review of Treatment Strategies in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.简化研究成果转化为临床实践的过程:让您的患者和医疗实践蓬勃发展:何时融合?退行性腰椎滑脱症治疗策略的循证综述
Global Spine J. 2025 Jun 11:21925682251336755. doi: 10.1177/21925682251336755.
10
ROCK-dependent mechanotransduction of macroscale forces drives fibrosis in degenerative spinal disease.由ROCK介导的宏观力机械转导驱动退行性脊柱疾病中的纤维化。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1038/s41551-025-01396-7.