Werbart Törnblom Annelie, Werbart Andrzej, Sorjonen Kimmo, Runeson Bo
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet (KI), Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 4;19(12):e0313673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313673. eCollection 2024.
The aim of the present study was to compare risk factors for death by suicide and sudden violent death (SVD) among young people aged 10-25 years. Two target samples, 63 consecutive cases of youth suicide and 62 cases of SVD, were compared on potential risk factors differentiating the two groups from 104 controls. Data on psychiatric diagnoses, psychosocial factors, adverse childhood experiences, stressful life events, and coping strategies were collected in psychological autopsy interviews. Distinguishing for the suicide group was lower frequency of living in a steady relationship, adult psychiatric care, depression, autism spectrum disorder, being sexually assaulted, higher frequency of recent stressful life events, and lowest levels of adaptive coping. Distinguishing for the SVD group was a predominance of males, lower elementary school results, abuse of psychoactive drugs, being investigated or sentenced for criminal acts, conduct disorder or antisocial personality disorder. Common risk factors for both kinds of premature unnatural death included lower educational level, absence of work or studies, different forms of addiction, child and adolescent psychiatric care, borderline personality disorder, adverse childhood experiences, and less adaptive coping. Accordingly, there is a common ground of vulnerabilities, early adversities, and recent strains in life for both forms of premature death, but also substantial differences between these contrasting lethal developments. Prevention of both suicide and SVD should focus on adverse childhood experiences, learning difficulties, meaningful occupation, more adaptive coping, addiction, and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Suicide prevention should comprise promotion of adaptive stress management skills, depression prevention and treatment, and paying attention to young people with autism. SVD prevention should involve early response to learning difficulties, abuse of psychoactive drugs and delinquent behavior, and treatment of conduct disorder and antisocial personality disorder.
本研究的目的是比较10至25岁年轻人自杀死亡和突然暴力死亡(SVD)的风险因素。从104名对照中选取了两个目标样本进行比较,一个样本是63例连续的青少年自杀病例,另一个样本是62例SVD病例,比较区分这两组的潜在风险因素。在心理解剖访谈中收集了有关精神疾病诊断、心理社会因素、童年不良经历、应激性生活事件和应对策略的数据。自杀组的区别特征在于处于稳定关系中的频率较低、接受成人精神科护理、患有抑郁症、自闭症谱系障碍、遭受性侵犯、近期应激性生活事件的频率较高以及适应性应对水平最低。SVD组的区别特征在于男性占主导、小学成绩较低、滥用精神活性药物、因犯罪行为接受调查或被判刑、患有品行障碍或反社会人格障碍。两种过早非自然死亡的共同风险因素包括教育水平较低、无工作或学业、不同形式的成瘾、儿童和青少年精神科护理、边缘型人格障碍、童年不良经历以及适应性较差的应对方式。因此,两种过早死亡形式在脆弱性、早期逆境和近期生活压力方面存在共同基础,但在这些截然不同的致命发展之间也存在实质性差异。预防自杀和SVD都应关注童年不良经历、学习困难、有意义的职业、更具适应性的应对方式、成瘾以及边缘型人格障碍的治疗。预防自杀应包括促进适应性压力管理技能、预防和治疗抑郁症以及关注自闭症青少年。预防SVD应包括对学习困难、滥用精神活性药物和违法行为的早期应对,以及对品行障碍和反社会人格障碍的治疗。