Wormser Gary P, Zentmaier Lois, Liveris Dionysios, Schwartz Ira, Schneider Lindsey, Aguero-Rosenfeld Maria E
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY.
Clinical Laboratories, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla NY.
Am J Med. 2025 Apr;138(4):669-672. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.11.025. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Sera from patients from a single medical institution in New York State with human granulocytic anaplasmosis established by a positive polymerase chain reaction test (PCR) for Anaplasma phagocytophilum were used to assess the performance of serologic testing. All cases were also confirmed by culture in order to eliminate any false positive PCR samples.
A nested PCR was performed targeting the heat shock operon of A. phagocytophilum. Culture was done using the HL-60 promyelocytic cell line. Serologic testing was performed to detect IgG/A/M using an indirect immunofluorescence assay that incorporated a human isolate of A. phagocytophilum as the source of the antigen.
From 1997 to 2009, 38 human granulocytic anaplasmosis patients were evaluated. On the baseline serum sample 21 (55.3%; 95% CI: 38.3%-71.4%) had a positive serologic test; 7 samples (33.1%) were positive at a titer of 80-320 and 14 samples (66.7%) at a titer of at least 640. Sixteen (94.1%) of the 17 with a negative baseline test had follow-up testing performed. All 16 tested positive on a convalescent phase serum sample obtained from 6 to 45 days later.
PCR testing is the most commonly used direct diagnostic test to diagnose human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Our findings demonstrate that only approximately 55% of the PCR and culture positive cases were also seropositive on blood samples obtained at the same time point, indicating that serologic testing performed at the time of presentation has limited sensitivity. However, all of the 16 evaluable seronegative patients developed antibodies to A. phagocytophilum during convalescence.
背景/目的:来自纽约州一家医疗机构的患者血清,这些患者经聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测嗜吞噬细胞无形体呈阳性而确诊为人类粒细胞无形体病,用这些血清来评估血清学检测的性能。所有病例也通过培养进行了确认,以消除任何PCR假阳性样本。
进行巢式PCR检测嗜吞噬细胞无形体的热休克操纵子。使用HL-60早幼粒细胞系进行培养。采用间接免疫荧光法检测IgG/A/M,该方法采用一株人类嗜吞噬细胞无形体分离株作为抗原来源。
1997年至2009年,对38例人类粒细胞无形体病患者进行了评估。在基线血清样本中,21例(55.3%;95%可信区间:38.3%-71.4%)血清学检测呈阳性;7份样本(33.1%)滴度为80-320时呈阳性,14份样本(66.7%)滴度至少为640时呈阳性。17例基线检测为阴性的患者中有16例(94.1%)进行了随访检测。所有16例在6至45天后采集的恢复期血清样本检测均呈阳性。
PCR检测是诊断人类粒细胞无形体病最常用的直接诊断方法。我们的研究结果表明,在同一时间点采集的血样中,仅约55%的PCR和培养阳性病例血清学也呈阳性,这表明就诊时进行的血清学检测敏感性有限。然而,所有16例可评估的血清学阴性患者在恢复期均产生了抗嗜吞噬细胞无形体的抗体。