Fang Yanchun, Xia Linv, Lu Haiyan, He Hailing
Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, 318050 Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Arch Esp Urol. 2024 Nov;77(9):1089-1099. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247709.152.
Transperineal (TP) biopsy is increasingly used as an alternative to standard transrectal (TR) biopsy for prostate cancer detection to reduce infection risks. However, evidence on comparative diagnostic accuracy remains inconclusive. The aim of this study was to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing prostate cancer detection rates between TP and TR ultrasound biopsies.
PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and other databases were searched for relevant studies up to December 2023. Randomised trials and observational studies comparing TP and TR biopsies were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup analyses were conducted.
Nine studies comprising four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and five observational studies were analysed, including 2763 patients (1376 TP, 1387 TR). No significant difference was found in overall cancer detection rates between TP and TR biopsies (RR = 0.9762, 95% CI = 0.8225-1.1586 for random effects model). However, subgroup analysis found that the RCTs showed no difference (RR = 0.9681, 95% CI = 0.8491-1.1038), whereas the observational studies varied (RR = 0.9416, 95% CI = 0.8073-1.0983). Significant heterogeneity was present across studies (I = 64.3%, = 0.0156). Details on the prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in the included studies were provided, and no significant differences were found between TP and TR biopsies regardless of whether a PSA threshold of >10 ng/mL or <10 ng/mL was used.
In summary, this updated meta-analysis found no significant difference between TP and TR biopsies in overall prostate cancer detection rates. The subgroup analysis highlighted that results from RCTs specifically indicated equivalence in diagnostic accuracy. TP biopsy may be considered an appropriate alternative to TR biopsy for patients requiring prostate biopsy.
经会阴(TP)活检越来越多地被用作标准经直肠(TR)活检的替代方法,用于检测前列腺癌,以降低感染风险。然而,关于比较诊断准确性的证据仍然没有定论。本研究的目的是对比较TP和TR超声活检之间前列腺癌检出率的研究进行更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
检索截至2023年12月的PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和其他数据库中的相关研究。纳入比较TP和TR活检的随机试验和观察性研究。使用随机效应模型计算合并风险比(RRs)及其95%置信区间(CIs)。评估异质性,并进行亚组分析。
分析了9项研究,包括4项随机对照试验(RCTs)和5项观察性研究,共2763例患者(1376例TP,1387例TR)。TP和TR活检的总体癌症检出率没有显著差异(随机效应模型的RR = 0.9762,95% CI = 0.8225 - 1.1586)。然而,亚组分析发现RCTs没有差异(RR = 0.9681,95% CI = 0.8491 - 1.1038),而观察性研究则有所不同(RR = 0.9416,95% CI = 0.8073 - 1.0983)。各研究之间存在显著异质性(I² = 64.3%,P = 0.0156)。提供了纳入研究中前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平的详细信息,无论使用的PSA阈值是>10 ng/mL还是<10 ng/mL,TP和TR活检之间均未发现显著差异。
总之,这项更新的荟萃分析发现TP和TR活检在总体前列腺癌检出率上没有显著差异。亚组分析强调,RCTs的结果特别表明诊断准确性相当。对于需要进行前列腺活检的患者,TP活检可被视为TR活检的合适替代方法。