• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[麻醉监测中高频手术器械使用的风险]

[Dangers in the use of high-frequency surgical instruments in anesthesiologic monitoring].

作者信息

Rommelsheim K, Westhofen P, Stoeckel H

出版信息

Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed. 1986 Feb;21(1):20-6.

PMID:3963320
Abstract

Although the use of high-frequency units is routine in all surgical disciplines, there is still a justification for reminding users of the attendant risks. The most common injuries sustained by patients are burns caused by fault currents. Such risks increase when a combination of several electric devices is used, and in particular when the operation is performed with simultaneous anesthesiologic monitoring. All electrically conductive, direct or indirect contacts between the patient and the ground lead potential, and all connections resulting in a low resistance or a shorter distance between the active and "neutral" high-frequency electrode than the correct current pathway, may become competing "neutral" electrodes with high current densities. It is therefore imperative that all those involved should strictly observe the safety rules. The systematization of problem points is intended to introduce greater clarity into the relatively long list of admonitions, and to indicate possible organizational solutions.

摘要

尽管高频设备在所有外科领域的使用已很常规,但仍有必要提醒使用者注意相关风险。患者最常见的损伤是由故障电流导致的烧伤。当同时使用多种电气设备时,尤其是在进行手术并同步进行麻醉监测时,此类风险会增加。患者与接地导线电位之间的所有导电直接或间接接触,以及所有导致有源和“中性”高频电极之间电阻低或距离比正确电流路径短的连接,都可能成为具有高电流密度的竞争性“中性”电极。因此,所有相关人员必须严格遵守安全规则。对问题点进行系统化整理旨在使相对冗长的警示清单更加清晰,并指出可能的组织解决方案。

相似文献

1
[Dangers in the use of high-frequency surgical instruments in anesthesiologic monitoring].[麻醉监测中高频手术器械使用的风险]
Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed. 1986 Feb;21(1):20-6.
2
Burns caused by monitoring in anesthesia.麻醉监测引起的烧伤。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1978;29(3):305-11.
3
Two cases of burns caused by misuse of coagulation unit and monitoring.
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1978;29(3):313-6.
4
Monitoring instrumentation. Isolated inputs, electrosurgery filtering, burns protection: what does it mean?监测仪器。隔离输入、电外科滤波、烧伤防护:这是什么意思?
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1978;29(3):317-30.
5
A third-degree burn secondary to faulty electrocautery ground.因电灼接地故障继发的三度烧伤。
Anesth Analg. 1970 May-Jun;49(3):402-5.
6
Higher currents, greater risks: preventing patient burns at the return-electrode site during high-current electrosurgical procedures.电流越高,风险越大:在高电流电外科手术过程中防止患者返回电极部位灼伤。
Health Devices. 2005 Aug;34(8):273-9.
7
[Electrical risks and safety during the monitoring (author's transl)].监测期间的电气风险与安全(作者译)
Anesth Analg (Paris). 1979;36(9-10):375-8.
8
[Ground-isolated input circuits of the electronic diagnostic apparatus as means of increasing electric safety of the patient].[作为提高患者电气安全性手段的电子诊断设备的接地隔离输入电路]
Med Tekh. 1976 Mar-Apr(2):36-41.
9
Thermal injuries and patient monitoring during MRI studies.MRI研究期间的热损伤与患者监测。
Health Devices. 1991 Sep;20(9):362-3.
10
[Burns caused by electric surgical instruments].
Ugeskr Laeger. 1991 Mar 25;153(13):940-1.