Chevalley Karl, Zimmerman Jonas, Mittendorf Anton, Sennersten Filippa, Dalman Anton, Frogh Safora, Ringart Theo, Robinson Yohan, Sandström Göran
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Helicopter Emergency Medical Service, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Dec 4;32(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01299-7.
War causes severe suffering and harm to the civilian population. Knowledge about civilian injury patterns constitutes a part of the dimensioned planning and preparedness for medical care and civilian defence in times of war. This systematic review is conducted on request from The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare and includes civilian injury patterns in modern war.
The aim of the study is to describe civilian injury patterns in war 1973-2023. We have conducted a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. The protocol has been registered 2023-05-06 in PROSPERO (CRD4202321483).
The search resulted in 3455 identified articles. 1226 of those were duplicates. 2229 studies were assessed, and 1817 papers were excluded. 412 papers went through full text assessment resulting in 63 remaining papers. Injuries to the extremities constitutes 50%, followed by head injuries (26%) and injuries to the chest (18%). Notably, 23% of the wounded are children.
There is no standardized classification or method to report and describe civilian war injuries and the injury panorama. Variations in how the injuries were reported made synthesis of the results difficult. In the present survey we haven't investigated mortalities and causes of death. Reliable data from recent wars, such as the ongoing war in Ukraine and Gaza, was missing from the open literature.
The distribution of injuries seems comparable with data from World War II and the conflict in Korea. There is no standardized simple protocol to report civilian injuries in war. Ideally, a protocol should include even the severity impact of the injuries. Knowledge of civilian injury pattern and estimate of the total number of wounded is important to plan the civilian health care capabilities in war time.
战争给平民带来巨大痛苦和伤害。了解平民受伤模式是战时医疗护理和民防规模规划与准备工作的一部分。本系统评价是应瑞典国家卫生和福利委员会的要求进行的,涵盖现代战争中的平民受伤模式。
本研究旨在描述1973年至2023年战争中的平民受伤模式。我们使用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)协议进行了系统评价。该协议于2023年5月6日在国际系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号CRD4202321483)登记。
检索到3455篇已识别文章,其中1226篇为重复文章。评估了2229项研究,排除1817篇论文。412篇论文进行了全文评估,最终剩下63篇论文。四肢受伤占50%,其次是头部受伤(26%)和胸部受伤(18%)。值得注意的是,23%的伤者为儿童。
目前尚无标准化的分类或方法来报告和描述平民战争伤及其全貌。受伤情况报告方式的差异使得结果的综合分析变得困难。在本次调查中,我们未对死亡率和死亡原因进行研究。公开文献中缺少来自近期战争(如乌克兰和加沙的持续战争)的可靠数据。
受伤分布情况似乎与第二次世界大战和朝鲜冲突的数据相当。目前尚无用于报告战争中平民受伤情况的标准化简易协议。理想情况下,协议甚至应涵盖受伤的严重程度影响。了解平民受伤模式以及对受伤总人数的估计对于规划战时平民医疗保健能力至关重要。