• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者护理体验指数:腰椎手术中一种新型、可靠且实用的问卷。

Patients' experience of care index: A new, reliable, and useful questionnaire in lumbar spine surgery.

作者信息

Sayed Noor Arkan Sam, Knutsson Björn

机构信息

Clinical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, University City Rd, University City, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

Department of Diagnostics and Intervention (Orthopaedics), Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Brain Spine. 2024 Nov 17;4:104140. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.104140. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2024.104140
PMID:39634167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11616567/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient's experience of care (PEC) is crucial in enhancing and sustaining healthcare quality.

RESEARCH QUESTION

the primary aim of this study is to establish and assess a new questionnaire index designed to measure PEC following elective spinal surgery. This index serves as a tool to document, enhance, and maintain the quality of healthcare provided in this context.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The studied PEC index comprises 7 questions, each addressing different aspects of perioperative care. Our study involved 300 post-spinal surgery patients, sourced from the Swedish national register for spine surgery. Collected data included age, gender, education level, self-rated health, and primary language. The patients were contacted via telephone by trained interviewers, approximately 35 days after their surgery (with 60 patients re-interviewed after a few weeks). We employed linear regression, -test, and ANOVA models to examine the associations between the PEC index and the documented variables.

RESULTS

The PEC index demonstrated good internal consistency and reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.76, interclass correlation coefficient = 0.87). Additionally, the utility measures indicated associations between the PEC index and factors such as higher age (p = 0.014), male gender (p = 0.012), and better self-rated health (p = 0.011).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The PEC index seems to be a promising tool with a clinically useful composite questionnaire for assessing PEC in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. In clinical settings, the index can accompany other outcome scores to evaluate and compare different diagnoses and management methods.

摘要

引言

患者的就医体验对于提高和维持医疗质量至关重要。

研究问题

本研究的主要目的是建立并评估一个新的问卷指标,以测量择期脊柱手术后的患者就医体验。该指标作为一种工具,用于记录、提高和维持在此背景下提供的医疗质量。

材料与方法

所研究的患者就医体验指标由7个问题组成,每个问题涉及围手术期护理的不同方面。我们的研究纳入了300例脊柱手术后患者,数据来源于瑞典国家脊柱手术登记册。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、教育水平、自评健康状况和主要语言。在患者术后约35天,由经过培训的访员通过电话联系他们(其中60例患者在几周后再次接受访谈)。我们采用线性回归、t检验和方差分析模型来检验患者就医体验指标与记录变量之间的关联。

结果

患者就医体验指标显示出良好的内部一致性和可靠性(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.76,组内相关系数 = 0.87)。此外,效用测量表明患者就医体验指标与较高年龄(p = 0.014)、男性(p = 0.012)和较好的自评健康状况(p = 0.011)等因素之间存在关联。

讨论与结论

患者就医体验指标似乎是一个很有前景的工具,是一个具有临床实用性的综合问卷,用于评估择期脊柱手术患者的就医体验。在临床环境中,该指标可以与其他结局评分一起,用于评估和比较不同的诊断和管理方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade8/11616567/df7acf8ff684/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade8/11616567/8643e1136f25/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade8/11616567/df7acf8ff684/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade8/11616567/8643e1136f25/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ade8/11616567/df7acf8ff684/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' experience of care index: A new, reliable, and useful questionnaire in lumbar spine surgery.患者护理体验指数:腰椎手术中一种新型、可靠且实用的问卷。
Brain Spine. 2024 Nov 17;4:104140. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.104140. eCollection 2024.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
[Validation of a self-administered functional evaluation questionnaire after surgical treatment of lumbar spine stenosis].腰椎管狭窄症手术治疗后自我管理功能评估问卷的验证
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002 Oct;88(6):601-12.
4
Influence of racial disparities on patient-reported satisfaction and short- and long-term perception of health status after elective lumbar spine surgery.种族差异对患者报告的满意度以及择期腰椎手术后健康状况的短期和长期认知的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jul;29(1):40-45. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.SPINE171079. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
5
[Validation of the QFS measuring the frequency and satisfaction in social behaviours in psychiatric adult population].[用于评估成年精神病患者社交行为频率与满意度的QFS量表的验证]
Encephale. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1 Pt 1):45-59. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76136-x.
6
Artificial discs for lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease -update: an evidence-based analysis.用于腰椎和颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病的人工椎间盘——最新进展:基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(10):1-98. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
7
Patient-related Factors and Perioperative Outcomes Are Associated with Self-Reported Hospital Rating after Spine Surgery.患者相关因素和围手术期结局与脊柱手术后的自我报告医院评分相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Mar;478(3):643-652. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000892.
8
Spine patients demystified: what are the predictive factors of poor surgical outcome in patients after elective cervical and lumbar spine surgery?脊柱患者揭秘:择期颈椎和腰椎手术后患者手术结局不良的预测因素有哪些?
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1529-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.550. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
9
Which Factors Are Associated With Satisfaction With Treatment Results in Patients With Hand and Wrist Conditions? A Large Cohort Analysis.哪些因素与手部和腕部疾病患者对治疗结果的满意度相关?一项大型队列分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jul 1;480(7):1287-1301. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002107. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
10
Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index: pilot testing of consistency, reliability, and validity.腰椎僵硬残疾指数:一致性、可靠性和有效性的初步测试。
Spine J. 2013 Feb;13(2):157-61. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Reorganizing outpatient spine services increased efficiency and patient satisfaction.重组门诊脊柱服务提高了效率和患者满意度。
Brain Spine. 2025 Mar 26;5:104245. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104245. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Satisfaction With Care Is Associated With Better Outcomes in Function and Pain 1 Year After Lumbar Spine Surgery.腰椎手术后1年,患者对护理的满意度与更好的功能和疼痛结局相关。
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2022 Jan 17;9(1):7-14. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1883. eCollection 2022 Winter.
2
Waiting for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: suffering and a possibility to discover coping abilities.等待腰椎管狭窄症手术:痛苦与发现应对能力的可能性。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2021 Dec 10;14(1):30716. doi: 10.52965/001c.30716. eCollection 2022.
3
Predictors of Patient Satisfaction in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.
脊柱手术患者满意度的预测因素:系统评价。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Feb;146:e1160-e1170. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.125. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
4
Instruments for Measuring Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care: A Systematic Review.测量物理治疗护理满意度的工具:系统评价。
Phys Ther. 2020 Aug 31;100(9):1690-1700. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa111.
5
Patient-related Factors and Perioperative Outcomes Are Associated with Self-Reported Hospital Rating after Spine Surgery.患者相关因素和围手术期结局与脊柱手术后的自我报告医院评分相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Mar;478(3):643-652. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000892.
6
Patient Satisfaction in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.脊柱手术患者的满意度:文献系统综述
Asian Spine J. 2019 Dec;13(6):1047-1057. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0032. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
7
Key drivers of patient satisfaction in lumbar spine surgery.腰椎手术患者满意度的关键驱动因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jun;28(6):586-592. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.SPINE17732. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
8
Are Low Patient Satisfaction Scores Always Due to the Provider?: Determinants of Patient Satisfaction Scores During Spine Clinic Visits.患者满意度评分低是否总是由于提供者造成的?:脊柱就诊期间患者满意度评分的决定因素。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jan 1;43(1):58-64. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001453.
9
Instruments to measure patient experience of healthcare quality in hospitals: a systematic review.衡量医院医疗质量患者体验的工具:一项系统综述
Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 23;4:97. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0089-0.
10
The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.专业能力评估:发展、研究与实际影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1996 Jan;1(1):41-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00596229.