Ashraf Fanila, Anwar Kinza, Arshad Hafsah
Fanila Ashraf, MS-OMPT Railway General Hospital, Rawalpindi Islamabad, Pakistan.
Kinza Anwar, MS-OMPT Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Dec;40(11):2558-2564. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.11.9605.
To assess the efficacy of muscle energy technique (MET) in combination with conventional physical therapy compared to conventional physical therapy alone following mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients.
A randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Institute of Regenerative Medicine (IRM), Islamabad, Pakistan, for a time duration of 11 months from September 2022 to July 2023. Using non-probability purposive sampling, patients were randomly allocated to two treatment groups. Three treatment sessions per week for two weeks, lasting thirty minutes each, were administered with follow-up after one month. Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, ROM, were used to assess the Pain, functional status, and Range of motion. Within Group-Analysis was done using Friedman with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, while Mann-Whitney U-tests determined inter-group differences.
With-in Group-Analysis, showed statistically significant (p<0.05) at baseline, after one week, after two weeks, and after one month follow up in both the muscle energy technique (MET) Group-And conventional therapy group for NPRS, KNEE FLEXION ROM, and WOMAC. Between-Group-Analysis, also showed significant (p<0.05) for knee pain and WOMAC scores.
Both groups are effective for improving knee pain, and functional limitation in knee osteoarthritis patients. However, MET Group along with conventional therapy showed marked effects on improving knee pain, knee flexion ROM, and functional limitations after mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in knee osteoarthritis patients.
评估在膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者间充质干细胞移植后,肌肉能量技术(MET)联合传统物理治疗与单纯传统物理治疗相比的疗效。
于2022年9月至2023年7月在巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡再生医学研究所(IRM)进行了一项为期11个月的随机临床试验。采用非概率目的抽样法,将患者随机分为两个治疗组。每周进行三次治疗,共两周,每次持续30分钟,并在一个月后进行随访。使用数字疼痛评分量表、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数、关节活动度来评估疼痛、功能状态和活动范围。组内分析采用Friedman检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验,而Mann-Whitney U检验确定组间差异。
组内分析显示,在基线、一周后、两周后和一个月随访时,肌肉能量技术(MET)组和传统治疗组在数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)、膝关节屈曲活动度(KNEE FLEXION ROM)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)方面均具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。组间分析也显示膝关节疼痛和WOMAC评分有显著差异(p<0.05)。
两组对改善膝关节骨关节炎患者的膝关节疼痛和功能受限均有效。然而,在膝关节骨关节炎患者间充质干细胞移植后,MET组联合传统治疗在改善膝关节疼痛、膝关节屈曲活动度和功能受限方面显示出显著效果。