Cohen R M, Grant W, Lieberman P, Potter W, Golden E, Crawford L V, Herrod H, Yoo T J
Ann Allergy. 1986 Apr;56(4):308-12.
Twenty-four patients presenting with cough and/or nonwheezing dyspnea were evaluated with methacholine inhalation challenge (MC), distilled water inhalation challenge (DC), intracutaneous tests to varying concentrations of methacholine, total eosinophil counts (TEC), sinus and chest x-rays. We found a statistically significant difference (P less than .005) in the mean TEC in those patients with a positive MC test and those with a negative test. Hyperreactivity of the airways to methacholine in asthmatics is not found in the skin. Distilled water inhalation did not serve to substitute for MC as a test of hyperreactive airways. The TEC is an excellent screening test as a predictor of patients with cough or dyspnea who have hyperreactive airways.
对24例出现咳嗽和/或无哮鸣音性呼吸困难的患者进行了乙酰甲胆碱吸入激发试验(MC)、蒸馏水吸入激发试验(DC)、不同浓度乙酰甲胆碱皮内试验、外周血嗜酸性粒细胞总数(TEC)检测、鼻窦和胸部X线检查。我们发现,MC试验阳性患者和阴性患者的平均TEC存在统计学显著差异(P<0.005)。哮喘患者气道对乙酰甲胆碱的高反应性在皮肤试验中未发现。吸入蒸馏水不能替代MC作为气道高反应性的检测方法。TEC是预测咳嗽或呼吸困难且气道高反应性患者的优秀筛查试验。