Sun Jinchun, Peters Megan, Yu Li-Rong, Vijay Vikrant, Bidarimath Mallikarjun, Agrawal Mona, Flores-Torres Armando S, Green Amanda M, Burkhart Keith, Oliphant Jessica, Smallwood Heather S, Beger Richard D
Division of Systems Biology, National Center for Toxicological Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA.
Metabolomics. 2024 Dec 4;21(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11306-024-02195-y.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has widely varying clinical severity. Currently, no single marker or panel of markers is considered standard of care for prediction of COVID-19 disease progression. The goal of this study is to gain mechanistic insights at the molecular level and to discover predictive biomarkers of severity of infection and outcomes among COVID-19 patients.
This cohort study (n = 76) included participants aged 16-78 years who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and enrolled in Memphis, TN between August 2020 to July 2022. Clinical outcomes were classified as Non-severe (n = 39) or Severe (n = 37). LC/HRMS-based untargeted metabolomics/lipidomics was conducted to examine the difference in plasma metabolome and lipidome between the two groups.
Metabolomics data indicated that the kynurenine pathway was activated in Severe participants. Significant increases in short chain acylcarnitines, and short and medium chain acylcarnitines containing OH-FA chain in Severe vs. Non-severe group, which indicates that (1) the energy pathway switched to FA β-oxidation to maintain the host energy homeostasis and to provide energy for virus proliferation; (2) ROS status was aggravated in Severe vs. Non-severe group. Based on PLS-DA and correlation analysis to severity score, IL-6, and creatine, a biomarker panel containing glucose (pro-inflammation), ceramide and S1P (inflammation related), 4-hydroxybutyric acid (oxidative stress related), testosterone sulfate (immune related), and creatine (kidney function), was discovered. This novel biomarker panel plus IL-6 with an AUC of 0.945 provides a better indication of COVID-19 clinical outcomes than that of IL-6 alone or the three clinical biomarker panel (IL-6, glucose and creatine) with AUCs of 0.875 or 0.892.
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的临床严重程度差异很大。目前,没有单一标志物或标志物组合被视为预测COVID-19疾病进展的标准治疗方法。本研究的目的是在分子水平上获得机制性见解,并发现COVID-19患者感染严重程度和预后的预测生物标志物。
这项队列研究(n = 76)纳入了年龄在16至78岁之间、SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性且于2020年8月至2022年7月在田纳西州孟菲斯市登记入组的参与者。临床结局分为非重症(n = 39)或重症(n = 37)。采用基于液相色谱/高分辨质谱的非靶向代谢组学/脂质组学方法,研究两组血浆代谢组和脂质组的差异。
代谢组学数据表明,重症参与者的犬尿氨酸途径被激活。与非重症组相比,重症组中短链酰基肉碱以及含有羟基脂肪酸链的短链和中链酰基肉碱显著增加,这表明:(1)能量途径转向脂肪酸β氧化,以维持宿主能量稳态并为病毒增殖提供能量;(2)与非重症组相比,重症组的活性氧状态加剧。基于偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)以及与严重程度评分(IL-6)和肌酸的相关性分析,发现了一个生物标志物组合,其中包括葡萄糖(促炎相关)、神经酰胺和鞘氨醇-1-磷酸(炎症相关)、4-羟基丁酸(氧化应激相关)、硫酸睾酮(免疫相关)和肌酸(肾功能)。这个新的生物标志物组合加上IL-6,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.945,比单独使用IL-6或曲线下面积分别为0.875或0.892的三个临床生物标志物组合(IL-6、葡萄糖和肌酸)能更好地指示COVID-19的临床结局。