• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较血液系统恶性肿瘤患者在做出维持生命治疗决策时患者、家属、护士和医生的认知、决定因素及需求。

Comparing Perceptions, Determinants, and Needs of Patients, Family Members, Nurses, and Physicians When Making Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions for Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.

作者信息

Kim Semi, Ham Eun Hye, Kim Dong Yeon, Jang Seung Nam, Kim Min Kyeong, Choi Hyun Ah, Cho Yun A, Lee Seung A, Yun Min Jeong

机构信息

Department of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Mar 1;25(1):12-24. doi: 10.14475/jhpc.2022.25.1.12.

DOI:10.14475/jhpc.2022.25.1.12
PMID:37674893
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10180005/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This descriptive study compared the perceptions, determinants, and needs of patients, family members, nurses, and physicians regarding life-sustaining treatment decisions for patients with hematologic malignancies in the hematology-oncology department of a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea.

METHODS

In total, 147 subjects were recruited, gave written consent, and provided data by completing a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, the chi-square test, and the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Nurses (F=3.35) and physicians (F=3.57) showed significantly greater familiarity with the Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment than patients (F=2.69) and family members (F=2.59); (F=19.58, P<0.001). Many respondents, including 19 (51.4%) family members, 16 (43.2%) physicians, and 11 (29.7%) nurses, agreed that the patient's opinion had the greatest effect when making life-sustaining treatment decisions. Twelve (33.3%) patients answered that mental, physical, and financial burdens were the most important factors in life-sustaining treatment decisions, and there was a significant difference among the four groups (P<0.001). Twenty-four patients (66.7%), 27 (73.0%) family members, and 21(56.8%) nurses answered that physicians were the most appropriate people to provide information regarding life-sustaining treatment decisions. Unexpectedly, 19 (51.4%) physicians answered that hospice nurse practitioners were the most appropriate people to talk to about life-sustaining treatment (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

It is of utmost importance that the patient and physician determine when life-sustaining treatment should be withdrawn, with the patient making the ultimate decision. Doctors and nurses have the responsibility to provide detailed information. The goal of end-of-life planning is to ensure patients' dignity and respect their values.

摘要

目的

本描述性研究比较了韩国首尔一家三级医院血液肿瘤科患者、家属、护士和医生对血液系统恶性肿瘤患者维持生命治疗决策的认知、决定因素和需求。

方法

共招募了147名受试者,他们签署了书面同意书,并通过填写结构化问卷提供数据。使用方差分析、卡方检验和Fisher精确检验对数据进行分析。

结果

护士(F = 3.35)和医生(F = 3.57)对《维持生命治疗决策法》的熟悉程度明显高于患者(F = 2.69)和家属(F = 2.59);(F = 19.58,P < 0.001)。许多受访者,包括19名(51.4%)家属、16名(43.2%)医生和11名(29.7%)护士,都认为患者的意见在做出维持生命治疗决策时影响最大。12名(33.3%)患者回答说,精神、身体和经济负担是维持生命治疗决策中最重要的因素,四组之间存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。24名患者(66.7%)、27名家属(73.0%)和21名护士(56.8%)回答说,医生是提供维持生命治疗决策信息的最合适人选。出乎意料的是,19名(51.4%)医生回答说,临终关怀护士从业者是谈论维持生命治疗的最合适人选(P < 0.001)。

结论

患者和医生决定何时停止维持生命治疗至关重要,最终决定权在患者手中。医生和护士有责任提供详细信息。临终规划的目标是确保患者的尊严并尊重他们的价值观。

相似文献

1
Comparing Perceptions, Determinants, and Needs of Patients, Family Members, Nurses, and Physicians When Making Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions for Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.比较血液系统恶性肿瘤患者在做出维持生命治疗决策时患者、家属、护士和医生的认知、决定因素及需求。
J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Mar 1;25(1):12-24. doi: 10.14475/jhpc.2022.25.1.12.
2
Nurse's, physician's and family member's experiences of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment process in an intensive care unit.护士、医生和家庭成员在重症监护病房中停止或撤回生命支持治疗的过程体验。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Aug;32(15-16):4827-4842. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16556. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
3
Can curative or life-sustaining treatment be withheld or withdrawn? The opinions and views of Indian palliative-care nurses and physicians.是否可以停止或撤销治愈性或维持生命的治疗?印度姑息治疗护士和医生的意见与观点。
Med Health Care Philos. 2011 Feb;14(1):5-18. doi: 10.1007/s11019-010-9273-0.
4
Discrepancies among patients, family members, and physicians in Korea in terms of values regarding the withholding of treatment from patients with terminal malignancies.韩国患者、家庭成员和医生在对晚期恶性肿瘤患者停止治疗的价值观方面存在差异。
Cancer. 2004 May 1;100(9):1961-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20184.
5
Physicians' experiences and perceptions about withholding and withdrawal life-sustaining treatment in Chiang Mai University Hospital: a cross-sectional study.泰国清迈大学医院医生对终止和撤回生命支持治疗的经验和看法:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Aug 13;23(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01511-6.
6
End-of-Life Care Practice in Dying Patients after Enforcement of Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment For Patients in Hospice and Palliative Care or at the End of Life : A Single Center Experience.《<临终关怀或生命末期患者维持生命治疗决策法>实施后临终患者的临终关怀实践:单中心经验》
Hanguk Hosupisu Wanhwa Uiryo Hakhoe Chi. 2020 Jun 1;23(2):93-102. doi: 10.14475/kjhpc.2020.23.2.93.
7
Participation and Influencing Factors in the Decision-Making of Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Focus on Deceased Patients with Hematologic Neoplasms.维持生命治疗决策中的参与情况及影响因素:以血液系统肿瘤死亡患者为重点
J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Jun 1;26(2):69-79. doi: 10.14475/jhpc.2023.26.2.69.
8
The impact of healthcare professionals' personality and religious beliefs on the decisions to forego life sustaining treatments: an observational, multicentre, cross-sectional study in Greek intensive care units.医疗保健专业人员的个性和宗教信仰对放弃维持生命治疗决策的影响:希腊重症监护病房的一项观察性、多中心横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 21;7(7):e013916. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013916.
9
Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision in Palliative Care Based on Electronic Health Records Analysis.基于电子健康记录分析的姑息治疗中的生命维持治疗决策。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jan;32(1-2):163-173. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16206. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
10
Variations in reporting of nurse involvement in end-of-life practices in intensive care units worldwide (ETHICUS-2): A prospective observational study.全球重症监护病房护士参与临终实践报告的差异(ETHICUS-2):一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Jul;155:104764. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104764. Epub 2024 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
An international study of clinical, demographic, and competence-related determinants of communication with professionals.一项关于与专业人员沟通的临床、人口统计学及能力相关决定因素的国际研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Dec 5;33(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09000-5.
2
Issues and implications of the life-sustaining treatment decision act: comparing the data from the survey and clinical data of inpatients at the end-of-life process.《维持生命治疗决策法案的问题与影响:对终末期患者调查数据与临床数据的比较》
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Aug 19;25(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01088-y.
3
Basic Human Needs in the Elderly Receiving Palliative Care: A Scoping Review.接受姑息治疗的老年人的基本人类需求:一项范围综述
J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 1;25(4):178-192. doi: 10.14475/jhpc.2022.25.4.178.

本文引用的文献

1
Life-Sustaining Treatment in End-Stage Liver Disease Patients: Patients' Decisions and Results.终末期肝病患者的生命维持治疗:患者的决策与结果
Hanguk Hosupisu Wanhwa Uiryo Hakhoe Chi. 2020 Jun 1;23(2):85-92. doi: 10.14475/kjhpc.2020.23.2.85.
2
Patient Rights at the End of Life: The Ethics of Aid-in-Dying.临终患者的权利:临终关怀伦理
Prof Case Manag. 2020 Mar/Apr;25(2):77-84. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000392.
3
End-of-life communication in Korean older adults: With focus on advance care planning and advance directives.韩国老年人的临终沟通:重点关注预先护理计划和预先指示。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 Apr;16(4):407-15. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12603. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
4
Physician-related barriers to communication and patient- and family-centred decision-making towards the end of life in intensive care: a systematic review.重症监护室临终阶段医生在沟通以及以患者和家庭为中心的决策方面存在的相关障碍:一项系统综述
Crit Care. 2014 Nov 18;18(6):604. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0604-z.
5
The role and significance of nurses in managing transitions to palliative care: a qualitative study.护士在管理向姑息治疗过渡中的作用和意义:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Sep 30;4(9):e006026. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006026.
6
The broad spectrum of unbearable suffering in end-of-life cancer studied in dutch primary care.荷兰初级保健中研究的临终癌症患者所经历的广泛的无法忍受的痛苦。
BMC Palliat Care. 2012 Aug 1;11:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-11-12.