Fernández Inma, Vallina-Fernández Óscar, Alonso-Bada Sandra, Rus-Calafell Mar, Paino Mercedes
Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Oviedo, Spain.
Sierrallana Hospital, Cantabria Health Service, Torrelavega, Cantabria, Spain.
J Psychiatr Res. 2025 Jan;181:273-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.058. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
The main clinical high-risk of psychosis (CHRp) approaches are focused on core features of schizophrenia that might surface in the prodromal phases, mainly psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) (e.g., prodromal or schizotypal symptoms) or associated phenomena like basic symptoms or anomalous experiences of the self. Given that PLEs vary depending on distress levels, related common mental health problems, emotional regulation (ER) strategies and eventual clinical outcomes, exploring the heterogeneous nature of these PLEs and their psychological correlates could aid in distinguishing between subclinical and clinical psychotic experiences. The present study aims firstly to generate new evidence on the understanding of clinical relevance of PLEs and associated phenomena in a non-clinical representative sample of 1824 Spanish adolescents, according to their CHRp level (high/moderate/low). Secondly, we analyzed the possible mediating effect of three different emotional regulation strategies ((experiential avoidance (EA), cognitive reappraisal (CR) and emotional suppression (ES)) between PLEs and non-specific symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, trauma related distress and substance use. Results showed that a more frequent use of EA and ES resulted in a higher CHRp, with no differences in the use of CR. In addition, EA emerged as a significant mediating factor between CHRp and the development of emotional symptoms and substance use. Emotion regulation strategy may account for heterogeneity in PLE outcomes. The use of EA as a coping strategy for their PLEs in adolescents with CHRp may facilitate the development of common mental health problems such as anxiety, depression or cannabis use pathologies. Helping adolescents at CHRp to use non-avoidant coping strategies may be indicated if their preventive effects are demonstrated.
精神病临床高危(CHRp)研究方法主要聚焦于精神分裂症可能在前驱期出现的核心特征,主要是类精神病体验(PLEs)(如前驱症状或分裂型症状)或相关现象,如基本症状或自我异常体验。鉴于PLEs因痛苦程度、相关常见心理健康问题、情绪调节(ER)策略及最终临床结果而异,探索这些PLEs的异质性及其心理关联因素有助于区分亚临床和临床精神病体验。本研究旨在首先根据CHRp水平(高/中/低),在1824名西班牙青少年的非临床代表性样本中,就PLEs及相关现象的临床相关性理解生成新证据。其次,我们分析了三种不同情绪调节策略(经验性回避(EA)、认知重评(CR)和情绪抑制(ES))在PLEs与抑郁、焦虑、压力、创伤相关痛苦及物质使用等非特异性症状之间可能的中介作用。结果显示,更频繁使用EA和ES会导致CHRp升高,而CR的使用无差异。此外,EA成为CHRp与情绪症状及物质使用发展之间的显著中介因素。情绪调节策略可能解释了PLEs结果的异质性。对于有CHRp的青少年,将EA作为应对其PLEs的策略可能会促使焦虑、抑郁或大麻使用等常见心理健康问题的发展。如果能证明其预防效果,可能需要帮助有CHRp的青少年使用非回避性应对策略。