Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Dev Psychopathol. 2020 Feb;32(1):219-227. doi: 10.1017/S0954579418001682.
Emotion regulation dysfunction is characteristic of psychotic disorders, but little is known about how the use of specific types of emotion regulation strategies differs across phases of psychotic illness. This information is vital for understanding factors contributing to psychosis vulnerability states and developing targeted treatments. Three studies were conducted to examine emotion regulation across phases of psychosis, which included (a) adolescent community members with psychotic-like experiences (PLEs; n = 262) and adolescents without PLEs (n = 1,226); (b) adolescents who met clinical high-risk criteria for a prodromal syndrome (n = 29) and healthy controls (n = 29); and (c) outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (SZ; n = 61) and healthy controls (n = 67). In each study, participants completed the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire and measures of psychiatric symptoms and functional outcome. The three psychosis groups did not differ from each other in reported use of suppression; however, there was evidence for a vulnerability-related, dose-dependent decrease in reappraisal. Across each sample, a lower use of reappraisal was associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Findings indicate that emotion regulation abnormalities occur across a continuum of psychosis vulnerability and represent important targets for intervention.
情绪调节功能障碍是精神病性障碍的特征,但人们对不同精神病阶段特定类型的情绪调节策略的使用方式知之甚少。了解导致精神病易感性状态的因素并开发针对性的治疗方法,这方面的信息至关重要。进行了三项研究,以检查精神病各阶段的情绪调节情况,包括:(a)有精神病样体验(PLE)的青少年社区成员(n=262)和无 PLE 的青少年(n=1,226);(b)符合前驱综合征临床高风险标准的青少年(n=29)和健康对照组(n=29);以及(c)被诊断为精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍的门诊患者(n=61)和健康对照组(n=67)。在每项研究中,参与者都完成了情绪调节问卷以及精神病症状和功能结果的测量。三个精神病组在报告的抑制使用方面彼此之间没有差异;然而,有证据表明,再评价的使用随着易感性的增加而减少。在每个样本中,再评价的使用较少与较差的临床结果相关。研究结果表明,情绪调节异常存在于精神病易感性的连续体中,是干预的重要目标。