Rao Nandana D, Fullerton Stephanie M, Shirts Brian H, Chen Annie T, Henrikson Nora B
Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Department of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Front Health Serv. 2024 Nov 21;4:1455365. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1455365. eCollection 2024.
Implementation science frameworks with a focus on health equity have emerged to help guide the introduction of new interventions into healthcare and community settings while limiting health disparities. The purpose of this research was to explore the applicability of such frameworks to guide the equitable implementation of population genetic screening programs.
We searched PubMed and reference lists for relevant frameworks and examples of their use in health settings. We then assessed if and how selected frameworks provide guidance for different stages of population genetic screening: recruitment, sample collection, result return, follow-up care and long-term management, and cascade screening. Findings were synthesized into a list of health equity considerations specific to each stage.
We identified 5 implementation frameworks that focus on health equity. Guidance varied by framework type: determinant (explaining what affects implementation outcomes), process (translating research into practice), or evaluation (assessing implementation). Common characteristics included focusing implementation efforts on populations who have historically experienced health inequities and adapting interventions to fit local contexts. Process models also highlighted the importance of community partnerships.
Overall, frameworks offered broad recommendations applicable to population genetic screening program implementation. However, gaps still exist in guidance provided for later stages of population genetic screening. To improve the equitable implementation of genetic screening, future programs may benefit from utilizing one or more of these frameworks or by incorporating the health equity considerations and outcomes compiled in this analysis.
关注健康公平的实施科学框架已应运而生,以帮助指导将新干预措施引入医疗保健和社区环境,同时减少健康差距。本研究的目的是探讨此类框架在指导人群基因筛查项目公平实施方面的适用性。
我们在PubMed及参考文献列表中搜索相关框架及其在健康环境中的应用实例。然后,我们评估选定的框架是否以及如何为人群基因筛查的不同阶段提供指导:招募、样本采集、结果反馈、后续护理和长期管理以及级联筛查。研究结果被综合成每个阶段特定的健康公平考虑因素列表。
我们确定了5个关注健康公平的实施框架。不同框架类型的指导各不相同:决定因素框架(解释影响实施结果的因素)、过程框架(将研究转化为实践)或评估框架(评估实施情况)。共同特征包括将实施工作重点放在历史上经历过健康不公平的人群上,并使干预措施适应当地情况。过程模型还强调了社区伙伴关系的重要性。
总体而言,这些框架提供了适用于人群基因筛查项目实施的广泛建议。然而,在人群基因筛查后期阶段提供的指导仍存在差距。为了改善基因筛查的公平实施,未来的项目可能会受益于使用这些框架中的一个或多个,或纳入本分析中汇编的健康公平考虑因素和结果。