Suppr超能文献

利用人工神经网络和支持向量机对超声图像中的乳腺肿瘤进行准确分类。

Leveraging Artificial Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines for Accurate Classification of Breast Tumors in Ultrasound Images.

作者信息

Othman Abdullah Mohammed, Altun Yener, Maghded Ahmed Rizgar

机构信息

Department of Statistics, The Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, TUR.

Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, TUR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Nov 5;16(11):e73067. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73067. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Background and Aim Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women, and ultrasound imaging is crucial for early detection. However, variability in interpretation can affect diagnosis. Therefore, this study compared the performance of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machines (SVMs) in classifying breast tumors using ultrasound images. Method This comparative study was conducted from June 1, 2023, to June 1, 2024, using a convenience sampling method. Data were gathered from the Center for Breast Diseases at Nanakali Hospital in Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, and a publicly available dataset from Kaggle. ANN and SVM models were then applied to classify the tumors. Statistical analysis was performed using R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0 (Released 2021; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), with performance metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa coefficient calculated for both models. Results The ANN model achieved an accuracy of 87.78%, with a sensitivity of 86.67% and a specificity of 88.89%. The SVM model demonstrated an accuracy of 86.67%, with a higher specificity of 95.56% but a lower sensitivity of 77.78%. Both models showed substantial agreement between predicted and actual classifications, with Kappa coefficients of 75.56% for ANN and 73.33% for SVM. The mean, skewness, and area were identified as the most important variables for the ANN model, while solidity, circularity, and perimeter were the most critical features of the SVM model. Conclusions The results indicated that ANN had a marginally higher accuracy than SVM in classifying breast tumors. It is recommended to further optimize these models for clinical use, improve the integration of machine learning in medical imaging, and expand the dataset to enhance model generalizability and robustness.

摘要

背景与目的 乳腺癌是女性癌症相关死亡的主要原因,超声成像对于早期检测至关重要。然而,解读的变异性会影响诊断。因此,本研究比较了人工神经网络(ANN)和支持向量机(SVM)在使用超声图像对乳腺肿瘤进行分类方面的性能。方法 本比较研究于2023年6月1日至2024年6月1日进行,采用便利抽样方法。数据收集自伊拉克库尔德斯坦地区埃尔比勒纳纳卡利医院的乳腺疾病中心以及来自Kaggle的一个公开可用数据集。然后应用ANN和SVM模型对肿瘤进行分类。使用R(奥地利维也纳的R统计计算基金会)和IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 28.0版(2021年发布;美国纽约州阿蒙克的IBM公司)进行统计分析,为两个模型计算准确性、敏感性、特异性和kappa系数等性能指标。结果 ANN模型的准确率为87.78%,敏感性为86.67%,特异性为88.89%。SVM模型的准确率为86.67%,特异性较高,为95.56%,但敏感性较低,为77.78%。两个模型在预测分类和实际分类之间均显示出高度一致性,ANN的kappa系数为75.56%,SVM的kappa系数为73.33%。均值、偏度和面积被确定为ANN模型最重要的变量,而坚实度、圆形度和周长是SVM模型最关键的特征。结论 结果表明,在对乳腺肿瘤进行分类方面,ANN的准确率略高于SVM。建议进一步优化这些模型以供临床使用,改善机器学习在医学成像中的整合,并扩大数据集以提高模型的通用性和稳健性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验