Lamo Yangzin, Payal Yashwant Singh, Kumar Navin
Anaesthesiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, IND.
Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Dehradun, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Nov 4;16(11):e73012. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73012. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Background and aims Commencing early oral feeding soon after surgery is a crucial element of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). However, it is imperative to ensure safety with a natural progression to oral intake and patient satisfaction. In this prospective, randomized, outcome assessor-blind controlled study, we aim to compare the efficacy of postoperative feeding on-demand versus predetermined timing in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Materials and methods A total of 120 patients (18 to 60 years, either gender) with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, meeting inclusion criteria, and from the Department of General Surgery and Surgical Gastroenterology, were randomly allocated into two groups of 60 patients each. In the On-Demand group (Group OD), upon their request, patients received 200 ml of coconut water orally in small aliquots as per their comfort once fully awake. In the Predetermined-Time group (Group OT), patients received the same volume of coconut water at four hours post-surgery. The time of initial oral intake in Group OD, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and patient satisfaction in both groups were assessed. Results There was no difference in the incidence of PONV between Group OD (13; 21.7%) and Group OT (15; 25%) (p=0.666). The majority of patients in both groups, 39 (65%) in Group OD and 40 (68%) in Group OT requested food within the initial ≤ 2 hours. Furthermore, overall satisfaction was significantly higher in Group OD compared to Group OT (p < 0.001). Conclusions Allowing postoperative oral feeding upon patient request enhances satisfaction without compromising safety as compared to adhering to predetermined schedules.
术后尽早开始经口进食是术后加速康复(ERAS)的关键要素。然而,确保经口摄入自然过渡且患者满意的安全性至关重要。在这项前瞻性、随机、结果评估者盲法对照研究中,我们旨在比较全身麻醉下行择期胆囊切除术患者术后按需喂养与预定时间喂养的效果。
共有120例年龄在18至60岁、性别不限、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I-II级、符合纳入标准且来自普通外科和外科胃肠病科的患者,被随机分为两组,每组60例。在按需组(OD组),患者完全清醒后,根据自身需求,以小份多次的方式口服200毫升椰子水。在预定时间组(OT组),患者在术后4小时接受相同体积的椰子水。评估OD组首次经口摄入的时间、两组术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率以及患者满意度。
OD组(13例;21.7%)和OT组(15例;25%)的PONV发生率无差异(p = 0.666)。两组中的大多数患者,OD组39例(65%)和OT组40例(68%)在最初≤2小时内就要求进食。此外,OD组的总体满意度显著高于OT组(p < 0.001)。
与遵循预定时间表相比,允许患者术后按需经口进食可提高满意度且不影响安全性。