Smout Emily, Buechner Hadassah, Lynch Rosie, Dalton Louise, Rapa Elizabeth
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 11;10(20):e38908. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38908. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
Adversity during childhood is a common risk factor for poorer outcomes across physical, mental, and social health. Despite growing evidence and policy around preventing adversity and its sequalae, the incidence of adversity in childhood remains high. Child-facing practitioners (CfPs) may be well-placed to identify adversity and address its impact on children. This study investigated the understanding of adversity and current practice of CfPs working in the Education system, Healthcare and Social Care in England. An anonymous online survey was completed by 113 CfPs between April and June 2022. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Participating CfPs' reported using a range of assessment tools and direct observation, but there was a lack of consistency in the extent to which different types of adversity were explored in assessments. CfPs working in the Education system and Healthcare reported only liaising with Social Care services when a current worker was known to be involved with the family, or to make a referral. Indeed, a quarter of respondents from the Education system and Healthcare only considered early life experiences when capacity allowed. Over half of the CfPs in this survey 'did not know' or 'did not agree' that public services offer interventions to support families experiencing domestic abuse, parental mental health difficulties and addiction, or the impact of these adversities on children's wellbeing. The study highlights that CfPs could benefit from further training about the prevalence and impact of adversity to inform service delivery. A review of CfPs' routine assessments is needed to ensure that children's exposure to adversity is routinely identified; this will facilitate families to access appropriate support to mitigate the impact of such experiences.
童年时期的逆境是导致身体、心理和社会健康方面较差结果的常见风险因素。尽管围绕预防逆境及其后果的证据和政策不断增加,但童年逆境的发生率仍然很高。面向儿童的从业者(CfPs)可能处于识别逆境并应对其对儿童影响的有利位置。本研究调查了英格兰教育系统、医疗保健和社会护理领域的CfPs对逆境的理解以及当前的实践情况。2022年4月至6月期间,113名CfPs完成了一项匿名在线调查。数据采用描述性统计进行分析。参与调查的CfPs报告使用了一系列评估工具和直接观察方法,但在评估中探索不同类型逆境的程度缺乏一致性。在教育系统和医疗保健领域工作的CfPs报告称,只有在已知当前工作人员与该家庭有关联或进行转介时,才会与社会护理服务机构联系。事实上,来自教育系统和医疗保健领域的四分之一受访者仅在能力允许时才考虑早年经历。在本次调查中,超过一半的CfPs“不知道”或“不同意”公共服务提供干预措施来支持遭受家庭虐待、父母心理健康问题和成瘾问题的家庭,或这些逆境对儿童福祉的影响。该研究强调,CfPs可以从关于逆境的普遍性和影响的进一步培训中受益,以指导服务提供。需要对CfPs的常规评估进行审查,以确保常规识别儿童所面临的逆境;这将有助于家庭获得适当的支持,以减轻此类经历的影响。