Dusin Jarrod, Peltzer Jill
Department of Evidence Based Practice, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
School of Nursing, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
J Patient Exp. 2024 Dec 4;11:23743735241302941. doi: 10.1177/23743735241302941. eCollection 2024.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the cornerstone of contemporary healthcare, promoting the integration of scientific evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values to inform clinical decision-making and enhance patient outcomes. While patient engagement is recognized as a critical component of EBP, the extent to which it is incorporated in various EBP frameworks is unclear. This study is a secondary analysis of a scoping review which evaluated EBP frameworks used in healthcare settings. In the current study, our objective was to assess the level of patient engagement within those frameworks. To achieve this, we employed a patient engagement framework which characterizes engagement as a continuum, spanning consultation to involvement to shared leadership/partnership, across 3 healthcare domains: direct care, organizational design and governance, and policymaking. Our analysis revealed a gap in integrating patient values and preferences within EBP frameworks. Only 3 of the assessed frameworks showed a high degree of engagement across all domains. Future research should focus on developing strategies for implementing and evaluating meaningful engagement in EBP.
循证实践(EBP)是当代医疗保健的基石,它促进科学证据、临床专业知识和患者价值观的整合,为临床决策提供依据并改善患者治疗效果。虽然患者参与被认为是循证实践的关键组成部分,但它在各种循证实践框架中的纳入程度尚不清楚。本研究是一项对范围综述的二次分析,该范围综述评估了医疗环境中使用的循证实践框架。在当前研究中,我们的目标是评估这些框架内患者参与的程度。为实现这一目标,我们采用了一个患者参与框架,该框架将参与描述为一个连续体,涵盖从咨询到参与再到共同领导/伙伴关系,跨越三个医疗领域:直接护理、组织设计与治理以及政策制定。我们的分析揭示了循证实践框架在整合患者价值观和偏好方面存在差距。在评估的框架中,只有3个在所有领域都表现出高度的参与度。未来的研究应侧重于制定在循证实践中实施和评估有意义参与的策略。