Yuzbasioglu Ertugrul Betul, Veli Ilknur, Ertugrul Abdullah Seckin
Department of Orthodontics, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir, Turkey.
Department of Orthodontics, Izmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir, Turkey.
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Dec 7;30:e946419. doi: 10.12659/MSM.946419.
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to identify the changes in the levels of total oxidant status (TOS) and total antioxidant status (TAS) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples of patients treated with conventional brackets (CBs) and clear aligners (CAs) over a 30-day period. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty-four patients who received non-extraction treatment with either CBs or CAs were included in the study. GCF samples were obtained at baseline (T0) and on days 7 (T1) and 30 (T2) following initial phase of treatment. Clinical periodontal parameters were used to determine periodontal conditions of patients. ELISA method was used to determine TAS and TOS levels in GCF samples. RESULTS In the group treated with CAs, TOS levels in GCF were significantly high at T1 but approached T0 after the first month (T2) of treatment. In contrast, the group treated with CBs showed significantly high TOS levels in GCF at both T1 and T2 compared with T0. No significant changes were observed in GCF TAS data at T1 and T2 in either group (CA and CB), compared with T0. When comparing TOS data between the groups at T1 and T2, the CA group had lower TOS levels than the CB group (Mann-Whitney U with Bonferroni correction). Additionally, the CA group had lower periodontal clinical indexes than did the CB group. CONCLUSIONS Oxidative tissue damage during orthodontic teeth movements may be lower with CA treatment. In cases in which higher oxidative stress is anticipated, CA treatment may be preferred over CB treatment.
背景 本研究的目的是确定在30天的时间内,接受传统托槽(CBs)和透明矫治器(CAs)治疗的患者龈沟液(GCF)样本中总氧化状态(TOS)和总抗氧化状态(TAS)水平的变化。
材料与方法 本研究纳入了34例接受CBs或CAs非拔牙治疗的患者。在基线期(T0)以及治疗初始阶段后的第7天(T1)和第30天(T2)采集GCF样本。使用临床牙周参数来确定患者的牙周状况。采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法测定GCF样本中的TAS和TOS水平。
结果 在接受CAs治疗的组中,GCF中的TOS水平在T1时显著升高,但在治疗第一个月(T2)后接近T0。相比之下,接受CBs治疗的组在T1和T2时GCF中的TOS水平与T0相比均显著升高。与T0相比,两组(CA组和CB组)在T1和T2时GCF的TAS数据均未观察到显著变化。在T1和T2时比较两组之间的TOS数据,CA组的TOS水平低于CB组(采用Bonferroni校正的曼-惠特尼U检验)。此外,CA组的牙周临床指标低于CB组。
结论 使用CA治疗时,正畸牙齿移动过程中的氧化组织损伤可能较低。在预期氧化应激较高的情况下,CA治疗可能比CB治疗更可取。