Suppr超能文献

犬心包约束的评估

Assessment of pericardial constraint in dogs.

作者信息

Smiseth O A, Frais M A, Kingma I, Smith E R, Tyberg J V

出版信息

Circulation. 1985 Jan;71(1):158-64. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.1.158.

Abstract

To determine the better method of measuring pericardial constraint, pericardial pressure was recorded by a liquid-filled open-ended catheter and a liquid-containing flat balloon in six open-chest anesthetized dogs. Left ventricular pressure was measured by a micromanometer-tipped catheter and left ventricular anteroposterior diameter was measured by sonomicrometry. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was raised to 20 +/- 1.7 (mean +/- SD) mm Hg by intravenous saline. Left ventricular diastolic pressure-diameter loops were constructed (1) with incremental amounts of saline (0 to 50 ml) in the resealed pericardium, (2) with several small holes in the pericardium, and (3) with the pericardium widely open. Measured pericardial pressures were compared with what was assumed to be the correct pericardial pressure, i.e., the calculated difference between left ventricular diastolic pressure (at a given left ventricular diameter) before and after opening the pericardium. Pressure recorded by the flat balloon was similar to the calculated pericardial pressure at all pericardial liquid volumes. Pressure recorded by the open-ended catheter, however, was significantly lower (p less than .05) than the calculated pressure unless there was at least 30 ml of liquid in the pericardium. After several holes had been made in the pericardium it still exerted a constraining effect, as shown by a marked rightward or downward shift of the left ventricular diastolic pressure-diameter relationships after completely opening the pericardium. After holes were made in the pericardium pressure recorded by the flat balloon was still similar to the calculated pericardial pressure. However, pressure recorded by the open-ended catheter was significantly (p less than .02) lower than the calculated pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为确定测量心包束缚的更佳方法,在6只开胸麻醉犬中,用充液开放式导管和含液扁平球囊记录心包压力。用微测压导管测量左心室压力,用超声心动图测量左心室前后径。通过静脉输注生理盐水将左心室舒张末期压力升至20±1.7(均值±标准差)mmHg。构建左心室舒张压力-直径环:(1)在重新封闭的心包内注入递增剂量的生理盐水(0至50ml);(2)在心包上开几个小孔;(3)将心包广泛打开。将测得的心包压力与假定为正确的心包压力进行比较,即打开心包前后(给定左心室直径时)左心室舒张压力的计算差值。在所有心包液体量时,扁平球囊记录的压力与计算的心包压力相似。然而,除非心包内至少有30ml液体,开放式导管记录的压力显著低于计算压力(p<0.05)。在心包上开几个小孔后,它仍发挥束缚作用,完全打开心包后左心室舒张压力-直径关系明显右移或下移即表明了这一点。在心包上开孔后,扁平球囊记录的压力仍与计算的心包压力相似。然而,开放式导管记录的压力显著低于计算压力(p<0.02)。(摘要截短至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验